Evaluation of Radiation use Efficiency of Maize (Zea mays L.) and Styrian Oil Pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo var. styriaca) under Different Intercropping Ratios

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

Introduction: Mixed cropping is one of the oldest and most commonly used agricultural activities in low-yield systems in many parts of the world. One of the factors contributing to the superiority of the mixed cropping to sole cropping is the correct selection of its components. When plants with a distinct root system and different canopy structures are placed next to each other, they occupy different ecological niches and have different spatial and temporal uses of environmental resources in a more efficient way than a combination of resources. Light is one of the main components of growth and production of dry matter of plants. In non-stressed conditions, dry matter production is a function of the time and amount of photosynthesis active radiation received, the fraction of radiation absorbed by the plant, and the efficiency of absorbed radiation converted to dry matter. Among these components, it is possible to improve the absorbance of photosynthetic active radiation by increasing leaf area index and canopy leaf arrangement. Due to the fact that maize leaves are placed in a more vertical arrangement, while absorbing better light, allows the light to penetrate into the lower canopy portions. On the other hand, Cucurbitaceae family plants because of the rapid covering of the surface of the land through crawling growth and the ability to grow in the shade, are most of the plants that are cultivated mixed with maize. Styrian oil Pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) is an annual herbaceous plant which, due to its numerous medicinal properties, is one of the most important medicinal plants in the Cucurbitaceae family. Therefore, in maize and Styrian oil pumpkin mix cropping, most of the light is absorbed by the maize canopy surface due to its higher height and a different morphological structure, than the Styrian oil pumpkin and the rest of the light that passes through the upper layers is absorbed by the Styrian oil pumpkin canopy and hence, the efficiency of light consumption will be maximized. The aim of this study was to investigate the radiation use efficiency as an important aspect in crop growth and yield improvement.
Materials and Methods: In order to evaluate radiation use efficiency of maize and Styrian oil Pumpkin under different intercropping ratios, an experiment was conducted in a randomized completely block design with three replications in a field located in 10 km west of Shirvan, Iran in 2015. The experimental treatments were included intercropping replacement ratio of 75% maize: 25% Styrian oil Pumpkin, 50% maize: 50% Styrian oil Pumpkin, 25% maize: 75% Styrian oil Pumpkin and pure culture of both plants. A linear PAR Ceptometer (Sun Scan) was used to measure the radiation at top and under the canopy to calculate the amount of absorbed radiation by the canopy.
Results and Discussion: The results showed that there was a linear relationship between dry matter accumulation of both plants with cumulative photosynthetically active radiation. The correlation coefficient between them was greater than 0.9 in different intercropping treatments. Radiation use efficiency of maize was varied from 4.35 g MJ-1 in monoculture (the maximum amount) to 0.92 g MJ-1 (the minimum amount) in 25% maize: 75% Styrian oil Pumpkin treatment. The maximum and minimum amount of radiation use efficiency of Styrian oil Pumpkin (3.7 and 0.87 g MJ-1) were observed in monoculture and 75% maize: 25% Styrian oil Pumpkin treatments. The highest amount of total absorbed radiation among different intercropping ratios, was obtained in 50% maize: 50% Styrian oil Pumpkin and 25% maize: 75% Styrian oil Pumpkin. The maximum amount of total radiation absorbed by the canopy obtained70-110 days after sowing date. The results showed that canopy in mixed cropping treatment absorbed all received radiation in 70-110 days after sowing date. The maximum harvest index of maize (59.5) and Styrian oil pumpkin (24.1) was obtained from 25% maize: 75% Styrian oil pumpkin and 50% maize: 50% Styrian oil pumpkin, respectively.
Conclusions: The results indicated that there was a linear relationship between accumulation of dry matter of both plants and cumulative active photosynthesis radiation in different cropping treatments with correlation coefficient greater than 0.9. The slope of this line, which shows the efficiency of light consumption, varied from 4.35 g MJ-1 to pure maize, up to 0.92 g MJ-1 in the 25% maize ratio, and the highest and lowest amount of light consumption efficiency of Styrian oil pumpkin (3.7 and 0.87 g MJ-1) were observed in pure crop and 25% ratio of Styrian oil pumpkin, respectively.

Keywords

References

1. Alizadeh, Y., Koocheki, A., and Nassiri Mahallati, M. 2010. Evaluation of radiation use efficiency of intercropping of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and herb sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Agroecology 2 (1): 94-104. (in Persian).
2. Andrade, F. H., Uhart, S. A., and Cirilo, A. 1993. Temperature affects radiation use efficiency in maize. Field Crops Research 32 (1-2): 17-25.
3. Anil, L., Park, J., Phipps, R. H., and Miller, F. A. 1998. Temperate intercropping of cereals for forage: a review of the potential for growth and utilization with particular reference to the UK. Grass Forage Science 53: 301-317.
4. Azizi, G., Koocheki, A., Rezvani Moghaddam, P., and Nassiri Mahallati, M. 2015. Interaction of nutrient resource and crop diversity on resource use efficiency in different cropping systems. Agroecology 7 (1): 1-19. (in Persian).
5. Bakr, E. M. 2005. A new software for measuring leaf area, and area damaged by Tetranychus uritcae Koch. Journal of Applied Entomology (3): 173‐175.
6. Connolly, J., Goma, H. C., and Rahim, K. 2001. The information content of indicators in intercropping research. Agriculture. Ecosystems and Environment 87: 191-207.
7. Dehghani Tafti, A., Allah Dadi, A., Najafi, F., and Kianmehr, M. 2016. Evaluation of different levels of pelleted manure and urea and micro elements on growth and physiological indices of medicinal pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo var styriaca). Plant Production Research 22 (4): 49-65. (in Persian).
8. Fandika, I. R., Kemp, P. D., Millner, J. P., and Horne, D. J. 2011. Yield and water use efficiency in buttercup squash (Cucurbita maxima Duchesne) and heritage pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo Linn). Australian Journal of Crop Science 5 (6): 742-747.
9. Hamzei, J., Babaei, M., and Khorramdel, S. 2015. Effects of different irrigation regimes on fruit production, oil quality, water use efficiency and agronomic nitrogen use efficiency of pumpkin. Agroecology 7 (1): 99-108. (in Persian).
10. Hosseinpanahi, F., Koocheki, A., Nassiri, M., and Ghorbani, R. 2009. Evaluation of yield and yield component in potato/corn intercropping. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 7 (1): 23-30. (in Persian).
11. Hosseinpanahi, F., Koocheki, A., Nassiri Mahallati, M., and Ghorbani, R. 2010. Evaluation of radiation absorption and use efficiency in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) /corn (Zea mays L.) intercropping. Agroecology 2 (1): 45-54. (in Persian).
12. Hosseinpanahi, F., Pouramir, F., Koocheki, A., Nassiri Mahallati, M., and Ghorbani, R. 2011. Evaluation of radiation absorption and use efficiency in replacement series intercropping of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Agroecology 3 (1): 106-120. (in Persian).
13. Karimi, M., Esfahani, M., Bigluei, M. H., Rabiee, B., and Kafi Ghasemi, A. 2009. Effect of deficit irrigation treatments on morphological traits and growth indices of corn forage in the Rasht Climate. Electronical Journal of Crop Production 2 (2): 91-110. (in Persian).
14. Khoramivafa, M., Zehtab Salmasi, S., Dabbagh Mohammadi Nassab, A., Javanshir, A., and Mohammadi Shuti, A. 2006. Evaluation of competition in corn (Zea mays L.) and pumpkinseed (Cucurbita pepo var. styriaca) intercropping by reciprocal yield model and some competitive indices. Journal of Agronomy 5 (3): 456-460.
15. Khorramivafa, M., Dabagh Mohammadi Nasab, A., Zahtab Salmasi, S., Javanshir, A., and Mohammadi, A. 2008. Evaluation of some crop characteristics of corn (Zea mays L.) in intercropping with pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo var styruaca). Agricultural Science 17 (4): 75-85. (in Persian).
16. Khorramivafa, M., Eftekharinasab, N., Nemati, A., Sayadian, K., and Najafi, A. 2011. Economic evaluation of medicinal pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L. var. Striac)/ chickpea-lentil intercropping system associated with several nitrogen levels. Agronomical science 4 (5): 53-62. (in Persian).
17. Koocheki, A., Nassiri Mahallati, M., Mondani, F., Feizi, H., and Amirmoradi, S. 2009. Evaluation of radiation interception and use by maize and bean intercropping canopy. Agroecology 1 (1): 13-23. (in Persian).
18. Lindquist, J. L., Arkebauer, T. J., Walters, D. T., Cassman, K. G., and Dobermann, A. 2005. Maize radiation use efficiency under optimal growth conditions. Agronomy and Horticulture- Faculty publications, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Paper 92. Available at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub/92.
19. Liu, X., Rahman, T., Song, C., Yang, F., Su, B., Cui, L., Bu, W., and Yang, W. 2018. Relationships among light distribution, radiation use efficiency and land equivalent ratio in maize-soybean strip intercropping. Field Crops Research 224: 91-101.
20. Mansoori, H., Mansoori, L., Jamshidi, K., Rastgoo, M., and Moradi, R. 2013. Radiation absorption and use efficiency in additive intercropping of maize and bean in Zanjan Region. Crop Production and Processing 3 (9): 15-27. (in Persian).
21. Mohammadi, G., Safari-poor, M., Ghobadi, M., and Najaphy, A. 2015. The effect of green manure and nitrogen fertilizer on corn yield and growth indices. Sustainable Agriculture and Production Science 25 (2): 105-124. (in Persian).
22. Momirovic, N., Oljaca, S., Dolijanovic, Z., Simic, M., Oljacam M., and Janosevic, B. 2015. Productivity of intercropping maize (Zea mays L.) and pumpkins (Cucurbita maxima Duch.) under conventional vs. conservation farming system. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 20 (1): 92-98.
23. Moradi, P., Asghari, J., Mohsen Abadi, G., and Samiezadeh, H. 2015. Role of triple intercropping system in weeds control and naked-pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) yield. Sustainable Agriculture and Production Science 24 (4): 17-31. (in Persian).
24. Moradi Marjaneh, A., Banayan Aval, M., Rezvani Moghaddam, P., and Shabahang, J. 2013. Effects of different amount of nitrogen fertilizer and density on yield and light use efficiency of pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.). In First National Conference on Medicinal Plants and Sustainable Agriculture, October 10, Hamedan, Iran, Available at: http://www.civilica.com/Paper-MPSA01-MPSA01_155.html. (in Persian).
25. Moradi, P., Asghari, J., Mohsen Abadi, G. and Samizadeh, H. 2015. Role of triple intercropping system in weeds control and naked-pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) yield. Sustainable Agriculture and Production Science 24 (4): 17-31. (in Persian).
26. Moradi, P., Asghari, J., Mohsen Abadi, Gh. and Samiezadeh, H. 2016. Evaluation of the beneficial effects of triple intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.), pinto been (Phasaelous vulgaris L.) and pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.). Journal of Crop Production and Processing 6 (19): 177-189. (in Persian).
27. Nassiri Mahallati, M. 2000. Modelling potential of crop growth processes (translation). Mashhad Jihad daneshgahi, Mashhad, Iran. (Pp. 280). (in Persian).
28. Nassiri Mahallati, M., Koocheki, A., and Jahan, M. 2011. Light absorption and use efficiency in relay intercropping and fallow culture of winter wheat and corn. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 8 (6): 878-890. (in Persian).
29. Ng’etich, O. K., Nivokuri, A. N., Rono, J. J., Fashaho, A., and Ogweno, J. O. 2013. Effect of different rates of nitrogen fertilizer on the growth and yield of zucchini (Cucurbita pepo cv. Diamant L.) Hybrid F1 in Rwandan high altitude zone. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences 5 (1): 54-62.
30. North Khorasan meteorological administration. 2017. Climate data for Shirvan area. Retrieved 2017, Available at: http://www.nkhmet.ir/
31. O’Neal, M. E., Landis, D. A. and Isaacs, R. 2002. An inexpensive, accurate method for measuring leaf area and defoliation through digital image analysis. Journal of Economic Entomology 95 (6): 1190‐1194.
32. Otegui, M. E., Nicolini, M. G., Ruiz, R. A., and Dodds, P. A. 1995. Sowing date effects on grain yield components for different maize genotypes. Agronomy 87: 29-33.
33. Tsubo, M., and Walker, S. 2002. A model of radiation interception and use be maize/bean intercrop canopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 110: 203-215.
34. Tsubo, M., Walker, S., and Mukhala, E. 2001. Comparisons of radiation use efficiency of mono-/inter-cropping systems with different row orientations. Field Crops Research 71: 17-29.
35. Tsubo, M., Walker, S., and Ogindo, H. O. 2005. A simulation model of cereal-legume intercropping systems for semi-arid regions I. Model development. Field Crops Research 93: 10-22.
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 01 June 2018
  • Revise Date: 16 November 2019
  • Accept Date: 02 December 2019
  • First Publish Date: 21 June 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics