اثر تراکم کاشت بر میزان جذب و کارایی مصرف تشعشع ژنوتیپ‌های برنج (Oryza sativa L.) در شرایط کشت مستقیم

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 موسسه تحقیقات برنج کشور

2 مؤسسه تحقیقات برنج کشور

3 دانشگاه ایلام

چکیده

به‌منظور بررسی میزان جذب و کارایی مصرف نور و همچنین تعیین ضریب استهلاک نوری در سه ژنوتیپ برنج در تراکم‌های مختلف کشت مستقیم، آزمایشی به‌صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح پایه بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار و 15 تیمار در مزرعه تحقیقاتی موسسه تحقیقات برنج کشور- رشت اجرا شد. تیمارهای مورد مطالعه شامل پنج تراکم بذر (65، 80، 95، 110 و 125 کیلوگرم بذر در هکتار) و سه ژنوتیپ برنج (لاین امید بخش طاهر، رقم آنام و رقم هاشمی) بودند. نتایج نشان دادکه بیشترین عملکرد دانه در رقم طاهر (6380 کیلوگرم در هکتار) و رقم آنام (6100 کیلوگرم در هکتار) در تراکم 95 کیلوگرم بذر در هکتار به‌دست آمد ولی بیشترین عملکرد دانه در رقم هاشمی (5490 کیلوگرم در هکتار) در تراکم 110 کیلوگرم بذر در هکتار مشاهده شد. در این تحقیق، بیشترین (06/3 گرم بر مگاژول PAR) و کمترین (20/2 گرم بر مگاژول PAR) میزان کارایی مصرف نور به‌ترتیب در تراکم‌های 95 و 125 کیلوگرم لاین طاهر مشاهده شد. دو ژنوتیپ آنام و طاهر در تراکم 95 کیلوگرم در هکتار به‌ترتیب با 773 و 852 مگاژول PAR بر متر مربع و رقم هاشمی در تراکم 110 کیلوگرم در هکتار با 880 مگاژول PAR بر متر مربع، بالاترین میزان جذب تشعشع در طول فصل رشد را داشتند. افزایش تراکم تا سطح مطلوب در ارقام برنج باعث افزایش جذب و همچنین کارایی مصرف نور گردید. بین جذب و کارایی نور با عملکرد زیستی و دانه ارقام برنج همبستگی مثبتی مشاهده شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


1. Akita, K., and Tanaka, N. 1992. Effects of planting density and planting patterns of young seedlings transplanting on the growth and yield of rice plants. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 61: 80-86.
2. Akmal, M., and Janssens, M. J. J. 2004. Productivity and light use efficiency of perennial ryegrass with contrasting water and nitrogen supplies. Field Crops Research 88: 143-155.
3. Ala, A., Aghaalikhani, M., Amiri Larijani, B., and Soofizadeh, S. 2014. Radiation Use Efficiency of Rice Cultivars in Transplanting and Direct Cropping System in Interference with Weed. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science 45 (1): 147-160. (in Persian with English abstract).
4. Awal, M. A., Koshi, H., and Ikeda, T. 2006. Radiation interception and use by maize/peanut intercrop canopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 139: 74-83.
5. Ball, R. A., McNew, R., Vories, E. D., Keisling, T. C., and Purcell, L. C. 2001. Path analyses for population density effects on short-season yield. Agronomy Journal 93: 187-195.
6. Beheshti, A., Koocheki, A., and Nassiri Mahalati, M. 2002. The effect of planting pattern on light interception and radiation use efficiency in canopy of three maize cultivars. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal 18: 417-431. (in Persian with English abstract).
7. Brisson, N. C., Gary, E., Justes, R., Roche, B., Mary, D., Ripoche, D., Zimmer, J., Sierra, P., Bertuzzi, P., Burger, F., Bussiere, Y. M., Cabidoche, P., Cellier, P., Debaeke, J. P., Gaudillere, C., Henault, F., Maraux, B., Seguin, B. and Sinoquet. B. 2003. An overview of the crop model STICS. Eroupean Journal of Agronomy 18: 309-332.
8. Ceotto, E., and Castelli, F. 2002. Radiation use efficiency in flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.): Response to nitrogen supply, climatic variability and sink limitation. Field Crops Research 74: 117-130.
9. Chen, S., Yin, M., Zheng, X., Liu, Sh., Chu, G., Xu, Ch., Wang, D., and Zhang X. 2019. Effect of dense planting of hybrid rice on grain yield and solar radiation use in southeastern china. Agronomy Journal 111: 1-10.
10. Gallagher, J. L., and Biscoe, P. V. 1978. Radiation absorption, growth and yield of cereals. Journal of Agricultural Science 91: 47-60.
11. Holshouser, D. L., and Wittaker, J. P. 2002. Plant population and row spacing effects on early soybean productions systems in the mid-Atlantic USA. Agronomy journal 94: 603-611.
12. Huang, M., Tang, Q. Y., Ao, H. J., and Zhou, Y. B. 2017. Yield potential and stability in super hybrid rice and its production strategies. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 16: 1009-1017.
13. Huang, M., Chen, J., Cao, F., Jiang, L., Zou, Y., and Deng, G. 2016. Improving physiological N-use efficiency by increasing harvest index in rice: a case in super-hybrid cultivar Guiliangyou 2. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 62: 725-743.
14. Katsura, K., Maeda, S., Lubis, I., Horie, T., Cao, W., and Shiraiwa, T. 2008. The high yield of irrigated rice in Yunnan China: a cross-location analysis. Field Crops Research 101: 1-11.
15. Katsura, K., Okami, M., Mizonuma, H., and Kato, Y. 2010. Radiation use efficiency, N accumulation and biomass production of high-yielding rice in aerobic culture. Field Crops Research 117: 81-89.
16. Kemanian, A. R., Stockle, C. O., and Huggins, D. R. 2004. Variability of barley radiation use efficiency. Crop Science 44: 1662-1672.
17. Kiniry, J. R., Tischler, C. R., and van Esbroeck, G. A. 1999. Radiation use efficiency and leaf CO2 exchange for divers C4 grasses. Biomass and Bioenergy 17: 95-112.
18. Lancashire, P. D., Bleiholder, H., Langeluddecke, P., Stauss, R., van den Boom, T., Weber, E., and Witzen-Berger, A. 1991. A uniform decimal code for growth stages of crops and weeds. Annals of Applied Biology 119: 561-601.
19. Lindqueist, J. L., Timothy, J. A., Daniel, T. W., Kenneth, G. C., and Achim, D. 2005. Maize radiation use efficiency under optimal growth conditions. Agronomy Journal 97: 72-78.
20. Lin, X.-Q., Zhu, D. F., Chen, H. Z., and Zhang. Y. P. 2009. Effects of plant density and nitrogen application rate on grain yield and nitrogen uptake of super hybrid rice. Rice Science 16: 138-142.
21. Liu,K., Yang, R., Lu, J., Wang, X., Lu, B., Tian, X., and Zhang Y. 2019. Radiation use efficiency and source-sink changes of super hybrid rice under shade stress during grain-filling stage. Agronomy Journal 111: 1788-1798.
22. Marcelis, L. F., Heuvelink, M., E., and Goudriaan, J. 1998. Modeling biomass production and yield of horticultural crops: A review. Scientia Horticulture 74: 83-111.
23. Monteith, J. L. 1977. Solar radiation and productivity in tropical ecosystems. Journal of Applied Ecology 9: 747-766.
24. Mosavi, H., Alami, S., Fathi, Gh., Siahpoosh, A., and Gharineh, M. 2012. Effect of planting density and herbicide on control of barley in direct rice cultivation in Ahwaz. Applied Field Crop Research 90: 83-92. (in Persian with English abstract).
25. Peng, S., Khush, G. S., Virk, P., Tang, Q., and Zou, Y. 2009. Progress in ideotype breeding to increase rice yield potential. Field Crops Research 108: 32-38.
26. Peng, S. 2000. Single-leaf and canopy photosynthesis of rice. Studies Plant Science 7: 213-228.
27. Normile, D. 2008. Reinventing rice to feed the world. Science 321: 330-333.
28. Purcell, L. C., Rosalind A., Ball, J. D., Reaper, I., and Vories E. D. 2002. Radiation use efficiency and biomass production in soybean at different plant population densities. Crop science 42: 172-177.
29. Rosati, A., Metcalf, S. G., and Lampinen, B. D. 2004. A simple method to estimate photosynthetic radiation use efficiency of canopies. Annals of Botany 93: 567-574.
30. Saitoh, K., Shimoda, H., and Ishihara, K. 1990. Characteristics of dry matter production process in high yielding rice varieties. I. Canopy structure and light intercepting characteristics. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 51: 130-139.
31. San-oh, Y., Tomizawa, Y., Mano, Y., Ookawa, T., and Hirasawa, T. 2002. Characteristics of dry matter production in rice plants, cultivar Takanari, sown directly in submerged paddy field compared with conventionally transplanted plants. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 71: 317-327.
32. San-oh, Y., Oclarit, P., Ookawa, T., Motobayashi, T., and Hirasawa, T. 2006. Effects of planting pattern on the interception of solar radiation by the canopy and the light extinction coefficient of the canopy in rice plants direct-sown in a submerged paddy field. plant production science 9 (3): 334-342.
33. Sinclair, T. R. 2006. A reminder of the limitations of using Beer, s Law to estimate daily radiation interception by vegetation. Crop Science 46: 2343-2347.
34. Sinclair, T. R., and T. Horie. 1989. Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, and crop radiation use efficiency: a review. Crop Science 29: 90-98.
35. Sinclair, T. R., and Muchow, C. 1999. Radiation use efficiency. Advances in Agronomy 35: 215-265.
36. Stewart, D. W., Costa, C., Dwyer, L. M., Smith, D. L., Hamilton, R. I., and Ma, B. L. 2003. Canopy structure, light interception, and photosynthesis in maize. Agronomy Journal 95: 1465-1474.
37. Tsubo, M., Walker, S., and Mukhala, E. 2001. Comparisons of radiation use efficiency of mono-/inter-cropping systems with different row orientations. Field Crops Research 71: 17-29.
38. Vargas, L. A., Andersen, M. N., Jensen, C. R., and Orgenses, V. J. 2002. Estimation of leaf area index, light interception and biomass accumulation of Miscanthus sinensis ‘Goliath’ from radiation measurements. Biomass and Bioenergy 22: 1-14.
39. Wang, Q., Zhang, Q., Fan, D., and Lu, C. 2006. Photosynthetic light and CO2 utilization and C4 traits of two novel super-rice hybrids. Journal of Plant Physiology 163: 529-537.
40. Wang, D., M. R. Laza, K. G. Cassman, J. L. Huang, L. X., and Nie, X. X. 2016. Temperature explains the yield difference of double-season rice between tropical and subtropical environments. Field Crops Research 198: 303-311.
41. Wu, X. 2009. Prospects of developing hybrid rice with super high yield. Agronomy Journal 101: 688-695.
42. Xu, Y. F., Ookawa, T., and Ishihara, K. 1997. Analysis of the dry matter production process and yield formation of the highyielding rice cultivar Takanari, from 1991 to 1994. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 66: 42-50.
43. Zhang, L., Vanderwerf, W., Bastiaans, L., Zhang, S., and Spiertz, J. H. 2008. Light interception and utilization in relay intercrops of wheat and cotton. Field Crops Research 107: 29-42.
44. Zhang, Y., Tang, Q., Zou, Y., Li, D., Qin, J., Yang, Sh., Chen, L., Xia, B. and Peng, P. 2009. Yield potential and radiation use efficiency of ‘‘super’’ hybrid rice grown under subtropical conditions. Field Crops Research 114: 91-98.
45. Zeng, L., and Shanon, M. 2000. Effects of salinity on grain yield and yield components of rice at different seeding densities. Agronomy Journal 92: 418-423.
CAPTCHA Image