Evaluation of Yield and Radiation Use Efficiency of Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in Relay Intercropping

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• A Koocheki
• M Nasiri mahalati
• H Zarghani
• A Norooziyan

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

10.22067/gsc.v14i4.51159

Abstract

Introduction
Intercropping plays an important role in agriculture because of beneficial interactions. Intercropping of legumes and cereals is an old practice in tropical agriculture dating back to ancient civilization. Cereals and other plant intercrops could substantially increase forage quantity and quality and decrease the requirement for protein supplements. Intercropping of cereals and other plants is important for development of sustainable food production systems. This may be due to some of the potential benefits of intercropping systems such as high productivity and profitability, improvement of soil fertility, efficient use of resources, reducing damage caused by pests, diseases and weeds and improvement of forage quality The main advantage of intercropping is more efficient utilization of the available resources and the increased productivity compared to sole crops of the mixture. Therefore, this experiment was conducted to evaluate agronomic characteristics of wheat and Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) under relay intercropping with sugar beet.

Materials and Methods
In order to evaluate radiation use efficiency (RUE), yield and dry matter accumulation in winter wheat relay intercropping and sugar beet, a field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Station of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran, during 2012 growing season, using a completely randomized block with four replications. The experimental treatments included four treatments intercropping ratios of rows: 3: 1, 3: 2, 4: 2, 6: 2 (beet and wheat) with monocropping beet and monocropping wheat (sole crops), comprised the experimental factors.

Results and Discussion
The results of this experiment showed that the effects of intercropping were significant for many study traits. Also, the results showed that during the growing season, leaf area index, radiation crossing the canopy, radiation use efficiency, the amount of dry matter production and yield per unit area were affected by intercropping. The highest yield of wheat was observed in the intercropping treatments 4: 2 (1942 g.m-2) and the highest dry matter of beet sugar was obtained in monoculture (2063 g.m-²). Highest radiation use efficiency of wheat and sugar beet) was observed in treatment 4: 2 (65.1 and 38.2), respectively.

Conclusions
In general, results showed that maize-peanut intercropping could be profitable due to use of the available resources. It can be concluded that intercropping was more efficient than sole cropping especially this is the way to make better use of resources and increase efficiency compared with sequential planting species.

Keywords

• Radiation absorb
• Radiation Use Efficiency
• Relay intercropping
• yield

20.1001.1.20081472.1395.14.4.1.4

---

References

1. Acreche, M. M., and Slafer, G. A. 2009. Grain weight, radiation interception and use efficiency as affected by sink-strength in Mediterranean wheats released from 1940 to 2005. Field Crops Research 110(2): 98-105.

2. Zhang, L., van der Werf, W., Zhang, S., Li, B., and Spiertz, J. H. J. 2007. Growth, yield and quality of wheat and cotton in relay strip intercropping systems. Field Crops Research 103(3): 178–188.

3. Ghaemi, A. 2002. Physiological and morphological indices effective in increasing the yield and quality of sugar beet. Dissertations. College of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.

4. Goudriaan, J., and Monteith, J. L., 1990. A mathematical function for crop growth based on light interception and leafarea expansion. Annals of Botany 66(6): 695–701.

5. Jaggard, K., and Clark. C. 2000. Growth of sugar beet crops in 1999. British Sugar Beet Review 68(1): 6-11.

6. Jahan, M. 2004. Ecological aspects of intercropping chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L) and marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) with manure. Master thesis of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.

7. Jahani, M., Kochaki, A., and Nasiri Mohalati, M. 2008. Evaluation of different intercropping arrangements of cumin (Cuminum cyminum) and lentils (Lens culinaris) in low-input agricultural systems. Iranian Journal of Crop Research, 6 (1): 67-78. (In Persian with English Abstract).

8. Jahansooz, M. R., Yunusa, I. A. M., Coventry, D. R., Palmer, A. R., and Eamus. D. 2007. Radiation- and water-use associated with growth and yields of wheat and chickpea in sole and mixed crops. European Journal of Agronomy 26(3): 275–282. (In Persian with English Abstract).

9. Kemanian, A. R., Stockle, C. O., and Huggins. D. R. 2004. Variability of barley radiation use efficiency. Crop Science 44: 1662-1672.

10. Kochaki, A., and Khlqany, J. 1988. Sustainable agriculture in temperate regions of Mashhad University Press, 580 p. (In Persian).

11. Kochaki, A. 1997. Sustainable Agriculture, insight or method? Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 2 (20): 72-53. (In Persian with English Abstract).

12. Kochaki, A., Gholami, A., Mahdavi Damghan, A., and Tabriz, L. 2005. Principles of organic agriculture. Press Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. 385 p. (In Persian).

13. Kochaki, A., Hosseini, M., and Hashemi, A. 1995. Sustainable Agriculture Jihad University of Mashhad, 118: 6-28.

14. Kochaki, A., Lalegani. B., and Najib Nia, S. 2009. Evaluation of intercropping beans and corn production. Iranian Journal of Crop Research 7 (2): 605- 614. (In Persian with English Abstract).

15. Lecoeur, J., and Ney. B. 2003. Change with time in potential radiation use efficiency in field pea. European Journal of Agronomy 19(1): 91-105.

16. Li, L., Sun, J., Zhang, F., Li, X., Rengel, Z., and Yang, S. 2001. Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping II. Recovery or compensation of maize and soybean after wheat harvesting. Field Crops Research 71(3): 173-181.

17. Li, L., Sun, J., Zhang, F., Li, X., Yang, S., and Rengel, Z. 2001. Wheat maize or wheat/soybean strip Intercropping I Yield advantage and interspecific interaction on nutrients, Field Crops Research 71(2): 123-137.

18. Mandel, B. K., Das, D., Saha, A., and Mohasin, M., 1996. Yield advantage of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and ckpea (Cicer arietinum) under different spatial arrangements in intercropping. Indian. Journal of Agronomy 41(1): 17-21.

19. Milford, G. F. J., Travis, K. Z., Pockock, T. O., Jaggard, K. W., and Day, W. 1988. Growth and dry matter partitioning in sugar beet. The Journal of Agricultural Science 110(2):301-308.

20. Nasiri Mohalati, M., Kochaki, A., and Jahan, M. 2011. Light absorption and use efficiency in winter wheat cropping and relay intercropping and crop research. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 8(6): 878-890. (In Persian with English Abstract).

21. O’Connell, M. G., O’Leary, G. J., Whitfield, D. M., and Connor, D. J. 2004. Interception of photosynthetically active radiation and radiation use efficiency of wheat, field pea and mustard in a semi-arid environment. Field Crops Research 85(2-3): 111–124.

22. Olesen, J. E., Berntsen, J., Hansen, E. M., Petersen, B. M., and Petersen, J. 2002. Crop nitrogen demand and canopy area expansion in winter wheat during vegetative growth. European Journal of Agronomy 16(4): 279–294.

23. Padhi, A. K., Sahoo, B. K., and Das, K. C. 1993. Production potential, economic and energetics of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)-based intercropping systems under upland, rain-fed situation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 63(3): 160-165.

24. Rajcan, I., and Swanton, C. J. 2001. Understanding maize-weed competition: resource competition, light quality and the whole plant. Field Crops Research 71(2): 139-150.

25. Rinaldi, M., and Vonella. A.V. 2006. The response of autumn and spring sown sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) toirrigation in southern Italy: water and radiation use efficiency. Field Crops Research 95(2-3): 103-114.

26. Scott, R.K., and Jaggard, K.W. 2000. Impact of weather, agronomy and breeding on yields of sugar beet grown inUK since 1970. The Journal of Agricultural Science 134(4): 341-352.

27. Sinclair, T. R., and Horie, T. 1989. Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, and crop radiation use efficiency: A Review. Crop Science 29: 90-98.

28. Tsubo, M., Walker, S., and Mukhala, E. 2001. Comparisons of radiation use efficiency of mono-/inter-cropping systems with different row orientations. Field Crops Research 71(1): 17–29.

29. Van der Meer, J. 1989. The Ecology of Intercropping. Cambridge University Press, New York, p. 237.

30. Webb, C. R., Werker, A. R., and Gilligan, C. A. 1997. Modelling the dynamical components of sugar beet crop. Annals of Botany 80(4): 427-436.

31. Werker, A. R., and Jaggard, K. W. 1998. Dependence of sugar beet yield on light interception and evapotranspiration. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 89(3-4): 229-240.

32. Zhang, L., van der Werf, W., Bastiaans, L., Zhangc, S., Li, B., and Spiertz. J. H. J. 2008. Light interception and utilization in relay intercrops of wheat and cotton. Field Crops Research 107(1): 29–42.