تأثیر مدت زمان تنش غرقاب در مراحل مختلف رشد بر برخی ویژگی‌های فتوسنتزی، فعالیت آنتی‌اکسیدانی و عملکرد گلرنگ زراعی (Carthamus tinctorius L.)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه مهندسی تولید و ژنتیک گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

چکیده

تنش غرقاب، یک تنش محیطی پیچیده و از عوامل اصلی محدود­کننده بهره‌­وری و پایداری محصول است. به‌منظور بررسی تأثیر مدت زمان تنش غرقاب در مرحله رشد رویشی و زایشی روی برخی از ویژگی­‌های فتوسنتزی و فعالیت آنزیم‌­های آنتی­‌اکسیدان گلرنگ زراعی (Carthamus tinctorius L.)، پژوهشی مزرعه‌­ای به‌صورت کرت‌های خردشده در قالب طرح پایه بلوک­‌های کامل تصادفی در سه تکرار در سال زراعی 1400-1399 در دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز اجرا شد. سه سطح تنش غرقاب شامل: شاهد، تنش غرقاب ملایم (24 ساعت) و شدید (48 ساعت) در کرت‌های اصلی و تنش در مرحله رویشی و زایشی در کرت‌های فرعی قرار داده شدند. نتایج نشان داد که تیمارهای تنش غرقاب باعث کاهش معنی­‌دار هدایت روزنه‌­ای، سرعت فتوسنتز، شاخص کلروفیل و عملکرد دانه و روغن شد، ولی فعالیت آنزیم کاتالاز، پراکسیداز و سوپر اکسید دیسموتاز افزایش یافت. در شرایط تنش غرقاب شدید، فعالیت آنزیم­‌های آنتی‌اکسیدان در مرحله زایشی بیشتر از مرحله رویشی آن (به‌ترتیب 26، 17 و 9 درصد بیشتر) بود. بیشترین عملکرد دانه و روغن (به‌ترتیب 2056 و 469 کیلوگرم در هکتار) در شرایط آبیاری مطلوب و کمترین آن در تنش غرقاب شدید (به‌ترتیب 1256 و 317 کیلوگرم در هکتار) حاصل شد. تنش غرقاب ملایم و شدید منجر به کاهش معنی‌دار عملکرد دانه به‌ترتیب به‌میزان 34 و 39 درصد و عملکرد روغن به‌میزان 16 و 32 درصد در مقایسه با آبیاری مطلوب شد. منطبق با نتایج فعالیت آنزیم‌­های آنتی‌اکسیدان، بیشترین تأثیر تنش بر عملکرد دانه مربوط به تنش شدید در مرحله زایشی بود، به‌گونه‌­ای که سبب بیش­ترین مقدار کاهش به‌میزان 43 درصد در مقایسه با آبیاری مطلوب شد. به‌طور کلی، تنش غرقاب در مرحله زایشی گلرنگ نسبت به مرحله رویشی منجر به کاهش بیشتر عملکرد شد و این یافته‌­ها بر اهمیت تنش غرقاب بر دانه‌­های روغنی و زهکشی مزارع خوزستان در فصل زمستان جهت حذف آب اضافی پس از وقوع سیل و بارندگی­‌های سنگین تأکید دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

©2025 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

مراجع

  1. Annual 2022. Annual harvested area, production, and yield in 2021-2022. Ministry of Agriculture Jihad. Iran.
  2. Arbona, V., Hossain, Z., López-Climent, M. F., Pérez-Clemente, R. M., & Gómez-Cadenas A. (2008). Antioxidant enzymatic activity is linked to waterlogging stress tolerance in citrus. Physiology Plantarum, 132, 452-466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.01029.x
  3. Asada, K. (2006). Production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in chloroplasts and their functions. Plant Physiology, 141(2), 391-6. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.082040  
  4. Ashraf, M. A. (2012). Waterlogging stress in plants: A review. African Journal of Agricultural Research,7, 1976-1981.
  5. Bailey-Serres, J., Lee, S. C., & Brinton, E. (2012). Waterproofing crops: Effective flooding survival strategies. Plant Physiology, 160(4), 1698-709. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.208173.
  6. Bansal,, & Srivastava, J. P. (2012). Antioxidative defense system in pigeonpea roots under waterlogging stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum,34, 515-522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-011-0848-z
  7. Beers, R. F., & Sizer, I. W. (1952). A spectrophotometric method for measuring the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide by catalase. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 195(1), 133-40.
  8. Blokhina, O. B., Fagerstedt, K. V., & Chirkova, T. V. (1999). Relationships between lipid peroxidation and anoxia tolerance in a range of species during post-anoxic reaeration. Physiologia Plantarum, 105, 625-632. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.1999.105405.x
  9. Brennan, R. F., Mason, M. G., & Walton, G. H. (2000). Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on the concentrations of oil and protein in canola (Brassica napus) seed. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 23(3), 339-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160009382020
  10. De San Celedonio, R. P., Abeledo, L. G., Brihet, J. M., & Miralles, D. J. (2014). Waterlogging affects leaf and tillering dynamics in wheat and barley. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 202(5), 409-420. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12151
  11. Ding, J., Liang, P., Wu, P., Zhu, M., Li, C., Zhu, X., Gao, D., Chen, Y., & Guo, W. (2020). Effects of waterlogging on grain yield and associated traits of historic wheat cultivars in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze river, China. Field Crops Research, 264, 107695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107695
  12. Fazeli, S. B., Rahnama, A., & Hassibi, P. (2022). Effect of waterlogging stress on yield and yield components and photosynthetic characteristics of two Mung bean cultivars in Ahvaz conditions. Plant Productions, 45(1), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.22055/ppd.2020.30538.1805
  13. Fazeli, S. B., Meskarbashee, M. & Rahnama, A. (2023a). Effect of waterlogging stress at the three-leaf stage on the growth and some physiological characteristics of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum). Plant Productions, 46(2), 279-292. https://doi.org/10.22055/ppd.2023.42792.2072   
  14. Fazeli, S. B., Meskarbashee, M. & Rahnama, A. (2023b). Evaluation of waterlogging tolerance in twenty-one cultivars and genotypes of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) and its effect on some physiological characteristics of shoot and root system at the three-leaf stage. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 21(3), 303-318. https://doi.org/10.22067/jcesc.2023.80038.1209 
  15. Gill, S. S., & Tuteja, N. (2010). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology Biochemistry, 48(12), 909-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016
  16. Grassini, P., Indaco, G. V., Pereira, M. L., Hall, A. J., & Trápani, N. (2007). Responses to short-term waterlogging during grain filling in sunflower. Field Crops Research, 101, 352-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.12.009
  17. Gutierrez Boem, F. H., Lavado, R. S., & Porcelli, C. A. (1996). Note on the effects of winter and spring waterlogging on growth, chemical composition and yield of rape seed. Fied Crops Research, 47, 175-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(96)00025-1
  18. Hasanuzzaman,, Bhuyan, M., Zulfiqar, F., Raza, A., Mohsin, S. M., Mahmud, J. A., Fujita, M., & Fotopoulos, V. (2020). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under abiotic stress: Revisiting the crucial role of a universal defense regulator. Antioxidants,9, 681. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9080681
  19. Hasanuzzaman, M., Hossain, M. A., Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Fujita, M. (2012). Plant responses and tolerance to abiotic oxidative stress: Antioxidant defense is a key factor. In Crop Stress and its Management: Perspectives and Strategies. In: V. A. Bandi, K. Shanker, C. Shanker, M. Mandapaka (Eds.); Springer: Berlin, Germany. 261–316.
  20. Huang, B., & Johnson, J. W. (1995). Root respiration and carbohydrate status of two wheat genotypes in response to hypoxia. Annals of Botany, 75, 423-427. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1995.1041
  21. Hussain, M. I., Lyra, D. A., Farooq, M., Nikoloudakis, N., & Khalid, N. (2016). Salt and drought stresses in safflower: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 36, 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0344-8
  22. Khan, S., Anwar, S., Kuai, J., Noman, A., Shahid, M., Din, M., Ali, A., & Zhou, G. (2018). Alteration in yield and oil quality traits of winter rapeseed by lodging at different planting density and nitrogen rates. Scientific Reports, 8, 634. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18734-8
  23. Koutroubas, S. D., Papakosta, D. K., & Doitsinis, A. (2008). Nitrogen utilization efficiency of safflower hybrids and open-pollinated varieties under Mediterranean conditions. Field Crops Research, 107(1), 56-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2007.12.009
  24. Lee, Y. H., Kim, K. S., Jang, Y. S., Hwang, J. H., Lee, D. H., & Choi, I. H. (2014). Global gene expression responses to waterlogging in leaves of rape seedlings. Plant Cell Reports,33, 289-299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-013-1529-8
  25. Loreti, E., Van Veen, H., & Perata, P. (2016) Plant responses to flooding stress. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 33, 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2016.06.005
  26. Malik, A. L., Colmer, D. T., Lambers, H., Setter, T. L., & Schortemeyer, M. (2002). Short-term waterlogging has long-term effects on the growth and physiology of wheat. New Phytolog, 153, 225-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0028-646X.2001.00318.x
  27. Manvelian, J., Weisany, W., Tahir, N. A. R., Jabbari, H., & Diyanat, M. (2021). Physiological and biochemical response of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) cultivarsto zinc application under droughtstress. Industrial Crops and Products, 172, 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114069
  28. Mittler, R., Vanderauwera. S., Gollery, M., & Van Breusegem, F (2004). Reactive oxygen gene network of plants. Trends in Plant Science, 9(10), 490-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2004.08.009
  29. Nakano, Y., & Asada, K. (1981). Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant and Cell Physiology, 22(5), 867–880. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076232
  30. Parent, C., Capelli, N., Berger, A., Crèvecoeur, M., & Dat, J. F. (2008). An overview of plant responses to soil waterlogging. Plant Stress, 2, 20-27.
  31. Plaut, Z., Mayoral, M. L., & Reinhold, L. (1987). Effect of altered sink: Source ratio on photosynthetic metabolism in source leaves. Plant Physiology, 85, 786-791. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.85.3.786
  32. Qi, X. H., Xu, X. W., Lin, X. J., Zhang, W. J., & Chen, X. H. (2012). Identification of differentially expressed genes in cucumber (Cucumis sativus) root under waterlogging stress by digital gene expression profile. Genomics, 99, 160-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2011.12.008
  33. Rahnama,, Poustini, K., Munns, R., & James, R. A. (2010). Stomatal conductance as a screen for osmotic stress tolerance in durum wheat growing in saline soil. Functional Plant Biology, 37, 255-263. doi: http://doi.org/10.1071/fp09148.
  34. Shahrokhnia, M. H., & Sepaskhah, A. R. (2017). Physiologic and agronomic traits in safflower under various irrigation strategies, planting methods and nitrogen fertilization. Industrial Crops and Products, 95, 126-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.10.021
  35. Sheikh Mamo, B., Rahnama, A., & Hassibi, P. (2023). The influence of terminal heat stress on physiological and yield characteristics of promising sunflower cultivars in Ahvaz climate condition. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 16(3), 835-851. https://doi.org/10.22077/escs.2023.4928.2107
  36. Smith, I. K., Vierheller, T. L., & Thorne, C. A. (1988). Assay of glutathione reductase in crude tissue homogenates using 5,5'-dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic acid). Analytical Biochemistry, 175(2), 408-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(88)90564-7.
  37. Soengas, P., Rodríguez, V. M., Velasco, P., & Cartea, M. E. (2018). Effect of temperature stress on antioxidant defenses in Brassica oleracea. ACS Omega, 3(5), 5237-5243. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b00242  
  38. Striker, G. G. (2012). Time is on our side: The importance of considering a recovery period when assessing flooding tolerance in plants. Ecological Research, 27, 983-987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-012-0978-9
  39. Tian, L., Zhang, Y., Chen, P., Zhang, F., Li, J., Yan, F., Dong, Y., & Feng, B. (2021). How does the waterlogging regime affect crop yield? A global meta-analysis. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 634898. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.634898
  40. Wang, C., Hai, J., Yang, J., Tian, J., Chen, W., Chen, T., & Wang, H. (2016). Influence of leaf and silique photosynthesis on seeds yield and seeds oil quality of oilseed rape (Brassica napus). European Journal of Agronomy, 74, 112-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2015.12.008
  41. Wollmer, A. C., Pitann, B., & Muehling, K. H. (2018). Waterlogging events during stem elongation or flowering affect yield of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) but not seed quality. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 204, 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12244
  42. Wu, X., Tang, Y., Li, C., Wu, C., & Huang, G. (2015). Chlorophyll fluorescence and yield responses of winter wheat to waterlogging at different growth stages. Plant Production Science,18, 284-294. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.18.284
  43. Yan, K., Zhao, S., Cui, M., Han, G., & Wen. P. (2018). Vulnerability of photosynthesis and photosystem I in Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) exposed to waterlogging. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 125, 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.02.017
  44. Yin, D., Sun, D., Han, Z., Ni, D., Norris, A., & Jiang, C. Z. (2019). PhERF2, an ethylene-responsive element binding factor, plays an essential role in waterlogging tolerance of Petunia. Horticulture Research, 6, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-019-0165-z
  45. Zandi, R., Rahnama, A., & Meskarbashi, M. (2023). Effect of deficit irrigation regimes on photosynthetic, morpho-physiological and yield traits of safflower (Carthamus tinctorious) in Ahvaz climate condition. Crop Physiology Journal, 15(59), 19-40. http://cpj.ahvaz.iau.ir/article-1-1614-en.html
  46. Zhang, G., Tanakamaru, K., Abe, J., & Morita, S. (2007). Influence of waterlogging on some anti-oxidative enzymatic activities of two barley genotypes differing in anoxia tolerance. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum,29, 171-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-006-0022-1
  47. Zhang, P., Lyu, D., Jia, L., He, J., & Qin, S. (2017). Physiological and de novo transcriptome analysis of the fermentation mechanism of Cerasus sachalinensis roots in response to short-term waterlogging. BMC Genomics, 18, 649. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4055-1
  48. Zhang, R., Zhou, Y., Yue, Z., Chen, X., Cao, X., Xu, X. X., Xing, Y. F., Jiang, B., Al, X. Y., & Huang, R. D. (2019). Changes in photosynthesis, chloroplast ultrastructure, and antioxidant metabolism in leaves of sorghum under waterlogging stress. Photosynthetica,57, 1076–1083. https://doi.org/10.32615/ps.2019.124
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 07 تیر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 24 مرداد 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 10 شهریور 1403
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 21 اسفند 1403

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار