Effect of Cropping System Management on Yield, Yield Components and Weed Diversity in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• H. R Bahrevar
• M Jahan
• P Rezvani Moghaddam

Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

10.22067/jcesc.2021.72397.1086

Abstract

Introduction
Potato is one of the most valuable food products. Indeed, no product has the capacity to produce energy per unit area compared with it. Potato has been an important part of the diet in most countries, especially in developing countries. Conventional cropping systems emphasize short-term goals such as high profitability and yield, and their maintenance costs are maximized due to the use of external inputs such as fertilizers and chemical pesticides, so with no use of external inputs, yield is greatly reduced. On the other hand, sustainable farming systems are systems that rely on low-energy inputs and small amounts of chemicals for long-term production stability and environmental adaptation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different cropping system management on yield, yield components and weed diversity in potato cultivation.
Materials and Methods
This experiment was conducted during the two years of 2015-2016 and 2016-2017 in the farm of Ran-Firoozkooh Cooperation Ltd., located at 10 km east of city of Firoozkooh city. The experiment was conducted as split plot arrangement based on a randomized complete block design with four replications. In this research, various agricultural management assigned to the main plots and weeding and no-weeding operations were allocated to the sub plots. Cropping systems include the high input, medium input, low input and ecological. At the early June, the potato seed tubers were planted in plots of 15 × 6 m (with a distance of 70 cm between the rows, 22 cm on the rows) in all cropping systems. At the end of the growing season (Oct, 1) potato tubers were harvested. Data were analyzed using SAS 9.1 and figures were prepared using MS-EXCEL software.
Results and Discussion
Mean comparisons showed that the highest single tuber weight (87.6 g) obtained from high input system, which was 26% higher than the low input system. The results also indicated that the weight of single tuber was increased with increasing weed control, so that the highest rate of this trait was obtained from weeding treatments. In the ecological system, the yield of the tuber in the weed control treatment was significantly different than the weedy treatment. The highest amount of tuber yield was resulted in the high input system and in weeding treatment which was significantly higher than the ecological system and the weedy treatment. In the high input system, more access to nutrients (NPK) resulting in improved yield and growth component. The phosphorus used in the high input system has different roles such as cell division, fertilization and development of reproductive organs. This can improve root and tuber development and increase water absorption and nutritional elements. Another reason for the increased yield in medium and high-input cropping systems could be assigned to the reduction of weed density in these systems. Means comparison showed that the nitrogen content of tuber in the high input system was 1.34%, which was higher than the low input system by 13%. The highest level of this trait was obtained in weeding. Plants grown in the high-input system stored more of nitrogen in their tissues due to the higher input of nitrogen fertilizer. Dzida and Jarosz (2006) reported that in a greenhouse experiment, the application of nitrogen fertilizer had a positive effect on nitrogen accumulation in the shoots of savory (Satureja hortensis). On the other hand, Derakhshan et al. (2018) stated that increasing nitrogen fertilizer is not only not beneficial to the crop, but also complicates the weed problem, in which case weeds absorb nutrients faster and more than the crop. There was a negative correlation between increasing the use of inputs and Shannon-Wiener index, so that ecological system (1.32), which was without the use of inputs, had the highest rate of this index and the lowest one was observed in the high input system (0.87). The main reason for the loss of biodiversity in conventional farms compared with low and ecological systems seems to be the intensification of agricultural operations, which is associated with excessive consumption of inputs, including herbicides.
Conclusion
In general, the results of this study showed that with increasing input, yield and yield components of potatoes increased. The results also showed that the highest amount of nitrogen was observed in tubers, potato shoots and also in weed tissues in the high input system and therefore it can be suggested that more use of chemical fertilizers has resulted in more nitrogen storage in different plant tissues. On the other hand, with the decrease in the input in ecological and low-input systems, the amount of Shannon-Wiener diversity index increased so that the highest amount of this index was observed in ecological and low-input systems. Considering the reduction of environmental pollution in ecological systems, it seems that such systems are environmentally friendly and if such services can be valued, the ecological system will be more superior compared with the conventional ones.

Keywords

• Ecological
• High input
• Medium input
• Shannon-Wiener
• Weeding

20.1001.1.20081472.1401.20.2.5.6

Main Subjects

• Crop yield

---

References

1. Agbede, T. M. 2006. Effect of tillage on soil properties and yam yield on an Alfisol in southwestern Nigeria. Soil Tillage Research 86: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.01.012.
2. Agbede, T. M. 2010. Tillage and fertilizer effects on some soil properties, leaf nutrient concentrations, growth and sweet potato yield on an Alfisol in southwestern Nigeria. Soil and Tillage Research Journal 110: 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.06.003.
3. Alizadeh, M. R., and Allameh, A. 2015. Canola yield and yield components as affected by different tillage practices in paddy fields. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources 2 (3): 46-51. (in Persian with English abstract).
4. Amiri, M. B., Jahan, M., and Rezvani-Moghaddam, P. 2022. An exploratory method to determine the plant characteristics affecting the final yield of Echium amoenum & C.A. Mey. under fertilizers application and plant densities. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05724-8.
5. Anikwe, M. A. N., and Ubochi, J. N. 2007. Short-term changes in soil properties under tillage systems and their effect on sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) growth and yield in an Ultisol in southeastern Nigeria. Australian Journal of Soil Research 45 (5): 351-358. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR07035.
6. Ashraf, M., and Ali, Q. 2005. The effect of applied nitrogen on the growth and nutrient concentration of Kalonji (Nigella sativa). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45: 459-463. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA03261.
7. Aynehband, A., Shohani, M,.and Fateh, E. 2019. Evaluation of Agro-chemical characters of wheat agro ecosystem as affected double cropping systems and bio- chemical fertilizer management. Journal of Plant Production Research 26 (2): 71-84. DOI:22069/JOPP.2019.14557.2307.
8. Bera, S., Poddar, R., and Ghosh, R. K. 2015. Effect of weed management on the performance of potato and microflora population in rhizosphere. American Journal of Potato Research 42 (1): 29-35.
9. Berbeć, A., Staniak, M., Feledyn-Szewczyk, B., Kocira, A., and Stalenga, J. 2020. Organic but Also Low-Input Conventional Farming Systems Support High Biodiversity of Weed Species in Winter Cereals. Agriculture 10: 413.https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10090413.
10. Berbec, A. K. 2016. Weed diversity in spring cereals and weed seed bank in conventional and organic farms in the Province of Lublin. Ph. D. Thesis, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation State Research Institute, Puławy, Poland.
11. Bilalis, D., Efthimiadis, P., and Sidiras, N. 2001. Effect of three tillage Systems on weed flora in a 3-year rotation with four crops. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 186: 135-141. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-037X.2001.00458.x.
12. Brady, N. C. 1990. The nature and properties of soils. Cornell University and United States Agency of International Development. (USAID).
13. Coulibali, Z., Cambouris, A. N., and Parent, S. E. 2020. Cultivar-specific nutritional status of potato (Solanum tuberosum) crops. PLOS ONE 15 (3): e0230458. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230458.
14. Dawelbeit, M. I. and Babiker, E. A. 1997. Effect of tillage and method of sowing on wheat yield in irrigated Vertisols of Rahad, Sudan. Soil and Tillage Research Journal 42: 127-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(96)01088-4.
15. Delmotte, S., Tittonell, P., Mouret, J. C., Hammonda, R., and Lopez-Ridauraa, S. 2011. On farm assessment of rice yield variability and productivity gaps between organic and conventional cropping systems under Mediterranean climate. European Journal of Agronomy 35: 223-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2011.06.006.
16. Derakhshan, A., Siadat, S., and Bakhshandeh, A. 2018. Modeling the interaction of herbicide doses and nitrogen fertilizer on crop and weed biomass production in multiple weed species–wheat interference. Journal of Crop Production 11 (2): 169-184. DOI: 22069/EJCP.2018.14405.2091.
17. Deytieux, V., Munier-Jolain, N., and Caneill, J. 2016. Assessing the sustainability of cropping systems in single- and multi-site studies. A review of methods. European Journal of Agronomy 72: 107-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2015.10.005.
18. Dorado, J., and Lopez-Fando, C. 2006. The effect of tillage system and use of a paraplow on weed flora in a semiarid soil from central Spain. Weed Research 46: 424-431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2006.00532.x.
19. Dzida, K. and Jarosz, Z. 2006. Influence of nitrogen-potassium fertilization on the yield and on the nutrients content in Satureja hortensis Acta Agrophysica 7: 879-884.
20. Giuliano, S., Ryan, M. R., Véricel, G., Rametti, G., Perdrieux, F., Justes, E., and Alletto, L. 2016. Low-input cropping systems to reduce input dependency and environmental impacts in maize production: A multi-criteria assessment. European Journal of Agronomy 76: 160-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2015.12.016.
21. Haliniarz, M., Gaw, eE.da, D., Kwiatkowski, C., Frant, M., and Rozanska-Boczula, M. 2014. Weed biodiversity in field Pea under reduced tillage and different mineral fertilization conditions. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 20: 1340-1348.
22. Hassanpanah, D., and Hassanabadi. H. 2011. Evaluation of Quantitative Traits of Potato Cultivars in the Spring Cultivation and after Barley Harvest Plantings in Ardabil Region. Journal of Crop and Weed Ecophysiology 5 (1): 27-40.
23. Hildermann, I., Thommen, A., Dubois, D., Boller, T., Wiemken, A., and Mader, P. 2009. Yield and baking quality of winter wheat cultivars in different farming systems of the DOK long-term trial. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 89: 2477-2491.
24. Horwitz, W., and Latimer, G. W. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC), 18^th Maryland, USA.
25. Jahan, M., Javadi, M., Hesami, E., and Amiri, M. B. 2021. Nutritional management improved sesame performance and soil properties: a function‑based study on sesame as affected by deficit irrigation, water superabsorbent, and salicylic acid. Journal of Soil Scince and Plant Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00557-2.
26. Jalilian, J., Najafabadi, A., and Zardashti, M. R. 2017. Intercropping patterns and different farming systems affect the yield and yield components of safflower and bitter vetch. Journal of Plant Interactions 12) 1(: 92-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2017.1294712.
27. Kadiri, W. O. J., Fasina, A. S., and Babalola, T. S. 2021. Soil organic carbon concentration and stock of arable land use of two agro-ecological zones of Nigeria. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences 20 (3): 180-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2021.01.004.
28. Kapczyńska, A., and Stodolak, B. 2019. The morphological and physiological response of Lachenalia to supplemental irradiation. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology 60: 455-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-019-00142-8.
29. Khorramdel, S., Koochaki, A. R., and Nasiri, M. M. 2009. Effect of farming systems with different inputs on the variation, composition and density of weeds in corn. Agroecology 1 (2): 1-10. (in Persian with English abstract).
30. Kulak, M., Nemecek, T., Frossard, E. and Gaillard, G. 2013. How eco-efficient are low-input cropping systems in western europe, and what can be done to improve their eco-efficiency? Sustainability 5: 3722-3743. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5093722.
31. Lehoczky, E., Kismanyoky, A., and Nemeth, T. 2009. Weediness and nutrient uptake by weeds in relation to the soil tillage. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 40: 871-878. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620802694431.
32. Marschner, H. 2002. Relationships between mineral nutrition and plant diseases and pests. In: Marschner H, editor. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. New York (NY): Elsevier Science p. 436-460.
33. Mirlohi, A. F., Mohammadi, R., Razavi, S. J., Majidi, M. M., and Nourbakhsh, F. 2009. Effect of organic fertilizers and split application of nitrogen on yield and yield components of rice. Journal of Plant Production 16 (1): 29-43. (in Persian with English abstract).
34. Moeini, N., Dadashi, M. R., Dastan, S., and Faraji, A. 2020. Evaluating some qualitative and quantitative indices of local rice cultivars in paddy field planting systems in north of Iran. Journal of Plant Environmental Physiology 15 (57): 65-83.
35. Mondani, F., Golzardi, F., Ahmadvand, G., Ghorbani, R., and Moradi, R. 2011. Influence of weed competition on potato growth, production and radiation use efficiency. Notulae Scientia Biologicae 3 (3): 42-52. https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb336125.
36. Mumivand, H., Nooshkam, A., Moseni, A., and Babalar, M. 2013. Influence of Nitrogen and Calcium Carbonate Application Rates on Nitrate Accumulation and Yield of Summer Savory (Satureja hortensis). Journal of Crop Production 6 (2): 109-124.
37. Naseri rad, H., Rezvani Moghadam, P., Koochaki, A., and Jafari, A. 2019. The Effect of Farming Systems and Wheat Residues Managements on yield and yield components in Brassica Napus in Roumeshagen and chardavol locations in southwest of Iran. Applied Field Crops Research 32 (03): 89-116. DOI:22092/AJ.2019.121803.1294.
38. Rega, C., Helming, J., and Paracchini, M. L. 2019. Environmentalism and localism in agricultural and land-use policies can maintain food production while supporting biodiversity. Findings from simulations of contrasting scenarios in the EU. Land Use Policy 87: 103986. DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.05.005.
39. Rodrigues, P. M. S., Schaefer, C. E. G. R., Silva, J. D. O., Junior, W. G. F., Santos, R. M. D., and Viana Neri, A. 2016. The influence of soil on vegetation structure and plant diversity in different tropical savannic and forest habitats. Journal of Plant Ecology 11 (2): 226-236. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtw135.
40. Sans, F. X., Berner, A., Armengot, L., and Mader, P. 2011. Tillage effects on weed communities in an organic winter wheat–sunflower–spelt cropping sequence. Weed Research 51: 413-421. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2011. 00859.x.
41. Shah, F., and Wu, W. 2019. Soil and Crop Management Strategies to Ensure Higher Crop Productivity within Sustainable Environments. Sustainability 11: 1485. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051485.
42. Shannon, C.E., and Weaver, W. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois.144pp.
43. Therond, O., Duru, M., Estrade, R., and Richard, G. 2017. A new analytical framework of farming system and agriculture model diversities. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 37: 2. DOI: 10.1007/s13593-017-0429-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0429-7.
44. Trabelsi, M., Mandart, E., Le Grusse, P., and Bord, J. P. 2016. How to measure the agroecological performance of farming in order to assist with the transition process. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 23: 139-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5680-3.
45. Travlos, I. S., Cheimona, N., Roussis, I., and Bilalis, D. J. 2018. Weed-Species Abundance and Diversity Indices in Relation to Tillage Systems and Fertilization. Frontiers in Environmental Science 6: 11. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00011.
46. Trigo, A., Marta-Costa, A., and Fragoso, R. 2021. Principles of Sustainable Agriculture: Defining Standardized Reference Points. Sustainability 13: 4086. DOI:10.3390/su13084086.
47. Vakilpoor, M. H., and Babania, S. 2016. Environmental effects of chemical inputs price dumping on agricultural products. Journal of the Popularization of Science 7 (2): 75-83.