Effect of Tillage Systems and Residue Management on Soil Water Conservation, Yield and Yield Components of Wheat

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

Introduction
Soil is one of the most important components of production, food security, self-sufficiency and national economy. Soil of semi-arid regions, which most of Iran's agricultural lands are located in these areas, are poor in terms of organic matter. The soil tillage operations are carried out by means of moldboard plow and removal of plant residue in most of the agricultural systems. This operation, called conventional tillage, requires not only high energy but also damages to soil physical properties and erosion in the long-term. Conventional tillage does not provide good environmental conditions to maintain moisture in the soil due to the impossibility of managing plant residue in the soil surface. In addition this tillage increases the evaporation and losses of soil water content and reduces the soil organic carbon as a result conventional tillage reduces the physical, chemical and biological characteristics of the soil. The objective of this study was investigation of effect of conventional and reduced tillage systems and management of tomato residue on soil water content, yield and yield components of wheat.
Materials and Methods
The experiment was conducted as split plot based on randomized complete block design with three replications at the Agricultural Research Station, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, during growth season 2017-18. Tillage system (in two levels i.e. conventional and minimum tillage) and tomato residue retention (0, 30 and 60%) were in main plots and sub plots, respectively. The sowing date was 11th November in 2017.Sampling was done at harvest time and included plant height, spike number.m-2, spike length, grain number per spike, 1000 grain weight, grain yield, biological yield and harvest index. During the growing season, soil water content in 0-20 and 20-40 cm depth was measured by the soil moisture meter (PMS-714 model) two days after irrigation. Data were analyzed with R software; obtained averages compared with Duncan’s multiple range test at the 5% probability level.
Results and Discussion
The results showed that the effect of tillage system was significant on soil water content in 0-20 cm depth two days after forth irrigation, soil water content in 20-40 cm two days after fifth, sixth and seventh irrigation, spike number.m-2, grain number per spike, grain and biological yield. Maximum of this traits were obtained in reduced tillage due to increased soil nutrition, improved physical condition of the soil and soil water status. However, the effect of management of tomato residue on any of the studied traits was not significant. This could be due to reducing microbial activity, in complete decomposition of plant residues and reducing available nitrogen.
The interaction effect between tillage system and tomato residue was significant on soil water content in 0-20 and 20-40 cm depth two days after forth and third irrigation, respectively, grain number per spike, 1000 grain weight and grain yield. Reduced tillage and 60% of tomato residue showed that maximum of soil water content and 1000 grain weight (38.4 g).Maximum of grain number per spike (61.9) and grain yield (7120. 7 kg.ha-1) were obtained in treatment of reduced tillage and 30% of tomato residue.
Conclusions  
The results of this study indicate that in order to achieve maximum grain yield and less damage to the physical and chemical properties of soil, the implementation of reduced tillage and maintenance of 30% of tomato residue is recommended in the studied area. In general, due to climate change and water resource constraints in the country, conservation tillage and residue management practices are a good way to maintain resources and sustainability.
                     

Keywords


1. Amini, A., Rajaie, M., and Farsinezhad, K. 2014. Effects of different plant residue under different tillage practices on yield and yield components of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Plant Ecophysiology 16: 27-37. (in Persian with English abstract).
2. Bohrani, M. J. 1996. Management of plant residue in irrigated cropping systems. Proceedings of 5th Conference of Agriculture and Plant Breeding, Karaj, Iran. (in Persian).
3. Emam, Y. 2003. Cereal Crops. Shiraz University, Iran. (in Persian).
4. Eskandari, I. 2004. Effects of different tillage and planting methods on soil moisture and seed yield of chickpea in dryland conditions. Seed and Plant 19 (4): 497-511. (in Persian with English abstract).
5. Eskandari, I., and Feiziasl, V. 2017. Influence of conservation tillage on some soil physical properties and crop yield in vetch-wheat rotation in dryland cold region. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 7 (2): 451-467. (in Persian with English abstract).
6. Friedrich, T., Kassam, A. H., and Shaxson, F. 2009. Conservation Agriculture. In: Agriculture for Developing Countries. Science and Technology Options Assessment (STOA) project. European Technology Assessment Group, Karlsruhe, Germany.
7. Frye, W. W., Blevins, R. L., and Smith, M. A. 2003. Cover crops in conservation tillage: benefits and liabilities. Agronomy Journal 22: 145-171.
8. Govaerts, B., Sayre, K. D., Goudeseune, B., De Corte, P., Lichter, K., Dendooven, L., and Deckers, J. 2009. Conservation agriculture as a sustainable option for the central Mexican highlands. Soil and Tillage Research 103: 222-230.
9. Helm V, 2005. Conservation tillage: corn, grain sorghum, and wheat in Dallas County, Texas. Soil and Tillage Research 23 (5): 356-366.
10. Hemmat, A. and Eskandari, I. 2006. Dryland winter wheat response to conservation tillage in a continuous cropping system in northwestern Iran. Soil and Tillage Research 86: 99-109.
11. Hobbs, P. R., Sayre, K., and Gupta, R. 2008. The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363: 543-555.
12. Jat, R. A., Wani, S. P., and Sahrawat, K. L. 2012. Conservation agriculture in the semi-arid tropics: prospects and problems. Advances in Agronomy 117: 191-237.
13. Kamkar, B., and Mahdavi Damghani, A., 2009. Principles of sustainable agriculture. Ferdowsi University Publication, Iran. (in Persian).
14. Karlen, D. L., Cambardella, C. A., Kovar, J. L., and Colvin, T. S. 2013. Soil quality response to long-term tillage and crop rotation practices. Soil and Tillage Research 133: 54-64.
15. Kaschuk, G., Alberton, O., and Hungria, M. 2010. Three decades of soil microbial biomass studies in Brazilian ecosystems: lessons learned about soil quality and indications for improving sustainability. Soil Biology and Biochemistry Journal 42: 1-13.
16. Kirigwi, F. M., Ginkel Van, M., Trethowan, R., Sears, R. G., Rajaram, S., and Aulsen, G. M. 2004. Evaluation of selection strategies for wheat adaptation across water regimes. Euphytica 135: 361-371.
17. Malhi, S. S., Lemke, R. L., Wang, Z., Farrell, R., and Chhabra, B. S. 2006. Tillage, nitrogen and crop residue effects on crop yield and nutrient uptake, soil quality and greenhouse gas emissions. Soil and Tillage Research 90: 171-183.
18. Moeini Rad, A., Yeganehpoor, F., and Pirdashti, H. 2015. Effects of different tillage methods on yield and yield components of N-80-9 wheat cultivar. Agroecology Journal 10 (4): 57-66. (in Persian with English abstract).
19. Rieger, S., Richner, W., Streit, B., Frossard, E., and Liedgens, M. 2008. Growth, yield and yield components of winter wheat and the effects of tillage intensity, preceding crops, and N fertilization. European Journal of Agronomy 28: 405-411.
20. Royo, C., Miloudi, M. M., Di Fonze, N., Arraus, J. L., Pfeiffer, W. H., and Slafer, G. A. 2005. Durum Wheat Breeding Current Approaches and Future Strategies. Food Product Press. New York, pp. 379-396.
21. Salami, M. R., Rezvani Moghaddam, P., Sharifi, H. R., Ghaemi, A. R., and Nassiri Mahallati, M. 2017. Different types of soil tillage and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) residue management on yield and yield components of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 15 (3): 663-675. (in Persian with English abstract).
22. Schillinger, W. F. 2005. Tillage method and sowing rate relations for dryland spring wheat, barley, and oat. Crop Science 45: 2636-2643.
23. Sharifi, H., Gazanchian, G. A., and Anahid, S. 2018. Effects of planting date and seed priming on partitioning coefficients, grain yield and yield components of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).‏ Iranian Journal of Seed Science and Technology 7 (1): 257-280. (in Persian with English abstract).
24. Singh, Y., Ladha, J. K., Khind, C. S., and Bueno, C. S. 2004. Effects of residue decomposition on productivity and soil fertility in rice- wheat rotation. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68: 854-864.
25. Singh, B. R., and Haile, M. 2007. Impact of tillage and nitrogen fertilization on yield, nitrogen use efficiency of tef (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter) and soil properties. Soil and Tillage Research 94: 55-63.
26. Tripathi, R. P., Sharma, P., and Singh, S. 2007. Influence of tillage and crop residue on soil physical properties and yields of rice and wheat under shallow water table conditions. Soil and Tillage Research 92: 221-227.
27. Zabolestani, A., Sedge, A. R., and Zamani, A. S. 2008. Effect of different tillage methods on grain yield and components of water wheat. Journal of new Agricultural Sciences 12: 39-48. (in Persian with English abstract).
28. Zarea, M. J. 2010. Conservation tillage and sustainable agriculture in semi-arid dryland farming. PP 195-238 in E. Lichtfouse ed. Biodiversity, Biofuels, Agroforestry and Conservation Agriculture. Springer Press.
29. Zarea Feizabadi, A., and Nourihosseini, M. 2013. Study on the variations of organic carbon and some nutrients in soil. Iranian Journal of Soil Research 27 (4): 629-643. (in Persian with English abstract).
30. Zarei, M., Kazemeini, S. A., and Bahrani, M. J. 2015. Effect of tillage systems and water stress on growth and yield of wheat. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 12 (4): 793-804.‏ (in Persian with English abstract).
CAPTCHA Image
  • Receive Date: 10 January 2019
  • Revise Date: 10 July 2019
  • Accept Date: 29 September 2019
  • First Publish Date: 20 March 2020