Improving Yield, Yield Components and the Absorption of Nutrients of Wheat by Growth Stimulants under Normal Irrigation and Drought Stress

Document Type : Research Article

Author

• M Rajaie

Soil and Water Research Department, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Shiraz, Iran

10.22067/jcesc.2022.72226.1083

Abstract

Introduction
Drought stress is one of the most important factors in reducing crop production in many arid and semi-arid regions of the world. In recent years, the use of growth stimulants to prevent the excessive use of chemical fertilizers and induce tolerance to environmental stresses has increased in order to achieve the goals of sustainable agriculture. Unlike chemical fertilizers, these compounds with the least adverse environmental effects are involved in increasing crop yields and conserving natural resources. The use of growth stimulants is one of the promising ways to overcome drought stress. Based on reports expressing the positive effects of growth stimulants drought tolerance, the present study was designed to investigate the moderating effect of growth stimulants at different irrigation intervals on improving yield, yield components and nutrient concentration in wheat.
Materials and Methods
The experiment was performed as a split plot based on randomized complete block design with three replications. This research was conducted during the growing seasons of 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 in Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center (Darab Agricultural Research station). The main factor includes different irrigation intervals at two levels (irrigation after 70 and 140 mm of cumulative evaporation from Class A evaporation pan) and the secondary factor includes the use of growth stimulants at seven levels (control, soil application of humic acid, foliar spray of amino acids, fulvic acids and seaweed extract, seed inoculation of Azotobacter and the combination of growth stimulants). The amount of irrigation water required in irrigation treatments was determined based on soil moisture supply at the depth of root development to reach the field capacity. Soil moisture was measured by weight method and through soil sampling in the middle of each plot to determine the evacuated moisture after reaching the desired cumulative evaporation. Foliar application of amino acids, fulvic acids and seaweed extract was performed at the concentration of 5 kg m^-3of water in two stages of tillering and complete emergence of spike. Humic acid fertilizer at a rate of 5 kg.ha^-1 was applied in the early stages of growth with the second irrigation. Seed Azotobacter inoculum was used at a rate of 1.5%. Finally, the concentration of nutrients in straw and grain, straw and grain dry weight, biological yield, harvest index and yield components were measured. Analysis of data variances was performed using SAS software version 9.1. Bartlett test was performed on all studied traits.
Results and Discussion
The results showed that the highest concentration of macro and micro nutrients in grain and straw were obtained in the combined treatment of growth stimulants. After this treatment, a significant increase in the concentration of nutrients was observed in the individual consumption of growth stimulants. Combination treatment of growth stimulants increased wheat biological yield by 18% compared to the control. Also, at a lower level, individual application of growth stimulants improved the biological yield compared to the control. The combination of growth stimulants and subsequently the individual application of these compounds improved the yield components of wheat. In the first and second year, irrigation after 140 mm of cumulative evaporation reduced the biological yield by 14 and 25% compared to 70 mm of cumulative evaporation, respectively. Also, irrigation after 140 mm of cumulative evaporation reduced the dry weight of straw, grain yield and harvest index compared to 70 mm of cumulative evaporation. In general, the results showed that the uptake of some nutrients was affected by the 140 mm cumulative evaporation treatment from the evaporation pan. However, in the second year of planting, due to the presence of frequent rains before flowering, the treatment of 140 mm of cumulative evaporation from the evaporation pan had less effect on nutrient uptake.
Conclusion
Overall, the use of a combination of growth stimulants was effective in increasing grain yield, biological yield and yield components of wheat. The results of this study showed that the growth stimulants to some extent caused drought tolerance by improving nutrients uptake. Therefore, the combination of growth stimulants in both normal irrigation and drought stress conditions can be used to improve nutrient uptake and wheat grain yield.

Keywords

• Azotobacter
• Grain yield
• Humic acid
• Seaweed extract

20.1001.1.20081472.1401.20.2.3.4

Main Subjects

• Environmental stresses

---

References

1. Aamir, M., Rai, K. K., Zehra, A., Dubey, M. K., Kumar, S., Shukla, V., and Upadhyay, R. S. 2020. Microbial bioformulation-based plant biostimulants: a plausible approach toward next generation of sustainable agriculture. Microbial Endophytes. pp. 195-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819654-0.00008-9.
2. Anjum, N. A., Gill, S. S., and Gill, R. 2014. Plant adaptation to environmental change: significance of amino acids and their derivatives (CABI).
3. Arif, M., Ilyas, M., Riaz, M., Ali, K., Shah, K., Haq, I. U., and Fahad, S. 2017. Biochar improves phosphorus use efficiency of organic-inorganic fertilizers, maize-wheat productivity and soil quality in a low fertility alkaline soil. Field Crops Research 214: 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.08.018.
4. Attarzadeh, M., Balouchi, H., Rajaie, M., Dehnavi, M. M., and Salehi, A. 2020. Improving growth and phenolic compounds of Echinacea purpurea root by integrating biological and chemical resources of phosphorus under water deficit stress. Industrial Crops and Products 154: 112763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112763.
5. Attarzadeh, M., Balouchi, H., Rajaie, M., Dehnavi, M. M., and Salehi, A. 2019. Improvement of Echinacea purpurea performance by integration of phosphorus with soil microorganisms under different irrigation regimes. Agricultural Water Management 221: 238-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.04.022.
6. Battacharyya, D., Babgohari, M. Z., Rathor, P., and Prithiviraj, B. 2015. Seaweed extracts as biostimulants in horticulture. Scientia Horticulturae 196: 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.012.
7. Bellaloui, N., Ebelhar, M. W., Gillen, A. M., Fisher, D. K., Abbas, H. K., Mengistu, A., Reddy, K. N., and Paris, R. L. 2011. Soybean seed protein, and fatty acids are altered by S and S+N fertilizers under irrigated and nonirrigated environments. Agricultural Sciences 2 (4): 465-476. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/as.2011.24060.
8. Bulgari, R., Franzoni, G., and Ferrante, A. 2019. Biostimulants application in horticultural crops under abiotic stress conditions. Agronomy 9 (6): 1-30. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9060306.
9. Canellas, L. P., Olivares, F. L., Aguiar, N. O., Jones, D. L., Nebbioso, A., Mazzei, P., and Piccolo, A. 2015. Humic and fulvic acids as biostimulants in horticulture. Scientia Horticulturae 196: 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.013.
10. Dehkhoda, A., Naderidarbaghshahi, N., Rezaei, A., and Majdnasiri, B. 2013. Effect of water efficiency stress on yield and yield component of sunflower cultivars in Isfahan. International Journal of Farming and Allied Sciences 2 (2): 1319-1324.
11. Dotaniya, M. L., and Meena, V. D. 2015. Rhizosphere effect on nutrient availability in soil and its uptake by plants: a review. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences 85: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-013-0297-0.
12. Du Jardin, P. 2015. Plant biostimulants: definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Scientia Horticulturae 196: 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.021.
13. Farooq, M., Wahid, A., Kobayashi, N., Fujita, D., and Basra, S. M. A. 2009. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 29: 185-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_12.
14. Flakelar, C. L., Luckett, D. J., Howitt, J. A., Dorana, , and Prenzler, P. D. 2015. Canola (Brassica napus) oil from Australian cultivars shows promising levels of tocopherols and carotenoids, along with good oxidative stability. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 42: 179-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2015.03.010.
15. Garcia-Mina, J., Antolin, M., and Sanchez-Diaz, M. 2004. Metal-humic complexes and plant micronutrient uptake: A study based on different plant species cultivated in diverse soil types. Plant and Soil 258: 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000016509.56780.40.
16. Halpern, M., Bar-Tal, A., Ofek, M., Minz, D., Muller, T., and Yermiyahu, U. 2015. The use of biostimulants for enhancing nutrient uptake. In: Sparks, D.L. (Ed.), Advances in Agronomy 129: 141-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2014.10.001.
17. Hopkins, B., and Ellsworth, J. 2003. Phosphorus nutrition in potato production. Idaho Potato Conference, Idaho University.
18. Khan, A., Guramni, A. R., Khan, M. Z., Hussain, F., Akhtar, M. E., and Khan. S. 2012. Effect of humic acid on growth, yield, nutrient composition, photosynthetic pigment and total sugar contents of peas (Pisum sativum). Journal of Chemical Society of Pakistan 6: 56-63.
19. Khatiwada, A., Neupane, I., Sharma, B., Bhetwal, N., and Pandey, B. 2020. Effects of drought stress on yield and yield attributing characters of wheat: A Review. Agriways 8 (2): 115-121.
20. Klokic, I., Koleska, I., Hasanagic, D., Murtic, S., Bosancic, B., and Todorovic, V. 2020. Biostimulants’ influence on tomato fruit characteristics at conventional and low-input NPK regime. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Soil and Plant Science 70: 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2019.1711156.
21. Kumar, R., Trivedi, K., Anand, K. V., and Ghosh, A. 2020. Science behind biostimulant action of seaweed extract on growth and crop yield: insights into transcriptional changes in roots of maize treated with Kappaphycus alvarezii seaweed extract under soil moisture stressed conditions. Journal of Applied Phycology 32: 599-613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-019-01938-y.
22. Lang, C. A. 1958. Simple microdetermination of Kjeldahl nitrogen in biological materials. Analytical Chemistr. 30: 1692-1694. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60142a038.
23. Layek, J., Das, A., Idapuganti, R. G., Sarkar, D., Ghosh, A., Zodape, S. T., Lal, R., Yadav, G. S., Panwar, A. S., and Ngachan, S. 2018. Seaweed extract as organic bio-stimulant improves productivity and quality of rice in eastern Himalayas. Journal of Applied Phycology 30: 547-558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-017-1225-0.
24. Liu, D. Y., Zhang, W., Pang, L. L., Zhang, Y. Q., Wang, X. Z., Liu, Y. M., Chen, X. P., Zhang, F. S., and Zou, C. Q. 2017. Effects of zinc application rate and zinc distribution relative to root distribution on grain yield and grain Zn concentration in wheat. Plant and Soil 411 (1-2): 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2953-7.
25. Madison, W. 1971. Instrumental method for analysis of soil and plant tissue. Soil Science Society USA, pp. 182-247.
26. Mishra, L. K., and Abidi, A. B. 2010. Phosphorous-Zinc interaction: effect on yield components and biochemical composition and bread making qualities of wheat. World Applied Sciences Journal 10 (5): 568-573.
27. Moshiri, F., Tehrani, M. M., Shahabi, A. A., Keshavarz, P., khoogar, Z., Faizi Asl, W., Asadi Rahmani, H., Samavat, S., Sadri, M. H., Rashidi, N., and Khademi, Z. 2016. A manual for intrgrated management of soil fertility and weath nutrition. Soil and Water Research Institute, Tehran, Iran.
28. Ova, E. A., Kutman, U. B., Ozturk, L., and Cakmak, I. 2015. High phosphorus supply reduced zinc concentration of wheat in native soil but not in autoclaved soil or nutrient solution. Plant and Soil 393: 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2483-8.
29. Pylak, M., Oszust, K., and Frąc, M. 2019. Review report on the role of bioproducts, biopreparations, biostimulants and microbial inoculants in organic production of fruit. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-019-09500-5.
30. Raimondo, M., Nazzaro, C., Marotta, G., and Caracciolo, F. 2021. Land degradation and climate change: Global impact on wheat yields. Land Degradation and Development 32: 387-398. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3699.
31. Rajaie, M., and Charkhandeh M. 2019. Improvement of the yield and grain protein in barley (Hordeum valgare) by iron, manganese and zinc foliar spray. 16 (1): 1-14.
32. Razi, K., and Muneer, S. 2021. Drought stress-induced physiological mechanisms, signaling pathways and molecular response of chloroplasts in common vegetable crops. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 41 (5): 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2021.1874280.
33. Romero-Munar, A., Del-Saz, N. F., Ribas-Carbó, M., Flexas, J., Baraza, E., Florez-Sarasa, I., Fernie, A. R., and Gulías, J. 2017. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis with arundo donax decreases root respiration and increases both photosynthesis and plant biomass accumulation. Plant, Cell Environment 40: 1115-1126. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12902.
34. Rose, M. T., Patti, A. F., Little, K. R., Brown, A. L., Jackson, W. R., and Cavagnaro, T. R. 2014. A meta-analysis and review of plant-growth response to humic substances: practical implications for agriculture. In: Sparks, D.S. (Ed.), Advances in Agronomy 124: 37-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800138-7.00002-4.
35. Rouphael, Y., and Colla, G. 2020. Biostimulants in agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00040.
36. Sabagh, A. E., Hossain, A., Barutçular, C., Islam, M. S., Ratnasekera, D., Kumar, N., Meena, R. S., Gharib, H. S., Saneoka, H., and da Silva, J. A. T. 2019. Drought and salinity stress management for higher and sustainable canola (Brassica napus) production: A critical review. Australian Journal of Crop Science 13: 88.
37. Saeidi, M., Moradi, F., and Abdoli, M. 2017. Impact of drought stress on yield, photosynthesis rate, and sugar alcohols contents in wheat after anthesis in semiarid region of Iran. Arid Land Research and Management 31: 204-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/15324982.2016.1260073.
38. Shaikh, S., and M. Saraf. 2017. Biofortification of Triticum aestivum through the inoculation of zinc solubilizing plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in field experiment. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 9: 120-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2016.12.008.
39. Supraja, K., Behera, B., and Balasubramanian, P. 2020. Efficacy of microalgal extracts as biostimulants through seed treatment and foliar spray for tomato cultivation. Industrial Crops and Products 151: 112453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112453.
40. Tejada, M., Rodríguez-Morgado, B., Paneque, P., and Parrado, J. 2018. Effects of foliar fertilization of a biostimulant obtained from chicken feathers on maize yield. European Journal of Agronomy 96: 54-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2018.03.003.
41. Trethowan, R. M., and Mujeeb-Kazi, A. 2008. Novel germplasm resources for improving environmental stress tolerance of hexaploid wheat. Crop Science 48: 1255-1265. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.08.0477.