Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research

Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research

Effect of Medaxtop on Grain Yield, Seed Quality and Physiological Characteristics of Two Open-pollinated Forage Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) Cultivars

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
H Alishahi 1
M AghaAlikhani 1
F Golzardi 2
F Moradi 3
1 Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
3 Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
10.22067/jcesc.2025.94419.1415
Abstract
Introduction
Forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench), a drought-tolerant C4 crop, is increasingly vital for sustainable livestock feed production in arid and semi-arid regions like Iran, where climate change and water scarcity threaten agricultural productivity. Despite its resilience, the limited availability of high-quality seeds hampers its widespread adoption. Plant growth regulators (PGRs), such as Medax Top (containing mepiquat chloride and prohexadione calcium), offer a promising approach to enhance grain yield and seed quality by modulating plant growth and assimilate allocation. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of Medax Top foliar application on grain yield, seed quality, and physiological traits of two open-pollinated forage sorghum cultivars under water-limited conditions, providing insights into optimizing seed production for sustainable agriculture.
Materials and Methods
A two-year field experiment (2023-2024) was conducted at the Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Karaj, Iran, using a factorial split-plot of treatment arrangement in complete randomized block design with three replications. Main plots comprised factorial combination of Medax Top doses (0, 0.5, 1, and 2 L ha-1) and application timings (3-4 and 6-8 leaf stages), while subplots included two sorghum cultivars (Mansour and Behesht). The trial was established in a semi-arid climate (265 mm annual rainfall, 14°C mean temperature) with drip irrigation. Measured traits included leaf SPAD-value, leaf area index (LAI), grain yield, seed germination percentage, grain starch, total carbohydrates, soluble sugars, and forage yield. Data were analyzed using SAS 9.1, with means compared via LSD’s test (P ≤ 0.05) after confirming variance homogeneity across years. 
Results and Discussion
Medax Top application significantly influenced physiological and agronomic traits. As the application rate of Medax Top increased, leaf SPAD -value, grain yield, grain starch content, carbohydrates, soluble sugars and seed germination percentage significantly increased. However, these positive changes were accompanied by a reduction in LAI and forage yield. Foliar application at the 3-4 leaf stage, compared to the 6-8 leaf stage, significantly increased starch content and grain yield while decreasing forage yield. Application at the 3-4 leaf stage yielded higher grain production (2976 kg ha-1) than the 6-8 leaf stage (2723 kg ha-1), likely due to reduced competition between vegetative and reproductive sinks in early development duration. The 2 L ha-1 of Medax Top maximized grain yield and germination percentage, alongside enhancing SPAD-value and carbohydrate content, reflecting improved photosynthetic efficiency and assimilate storage. However, forage yield decreased by 34% at this dose, indicating a shift in resource allocation from vegetative to reproductive growth. The Mansour cultivar demonstrated significant superiority over the Behesht in terms of starch content, carbohydrates, soluble sugars, and forage yield, showcasing superior genetic potential. The maximum grain soluble sugar content (6.88%) was observed in the Mansour cultivar with a ModaxTop application rate of 2 L ha-1 in the first year, while the highest grain yield (4542 kg ha-1) was achieved in the same cultivar with a dose of 1 L ha-1 in the second year. Lower doses (0.5-1 L ha-1) better supported forage production, balancing vegetative biomass retention.
Conclusion
This study demonstrated that foliar application of Medax Top effectively improved grain yield and seed quality in open-pollinated forage sorghum cultivars. A rate of 2 L ha⁻¹ applied at the 3–4 leaf stage was identified as the optimum treatment for seed production, particularly in the 'Mansour' cultivar. In forage production systems, however, lower application rates are recommended to minimize reductions in biomass. Overall, a foliar application of Medax Top at 2 L ha⁻¹ is recommended to maximize seed yield and quality, whereas an application rate of 1 L ha⁻¹ is more suitable for combined seed and forage production. These findings highlight the potential of plant growth regulators to optimize sorghum production according to specific production objectives, seed, forage, or both, in water-limited environments, thereby enhancing agricultural resilience and food security.
Acknowledgement
The authors express gratitude to the Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, the Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization (AREEO) for providing laboratory facilities and technical support in this research [Project number 03-03-0305-024-010312]. Also, thanks to the support of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Technology of Tarbiat Modares University.
Keywords
Germination percentage
Leaf area index
Plant growth regulator
Soluble sugar
Starch
Subjects

Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

  1. Baghdadi, A., Golzardi, F., & Hashemi, M. (2023). The use of alternative irrigation and cropping systems in forage production may alleviate the water scarcity in semi‐arid regions. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 103(10), 5050-5060. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.12574
  2. Bozek, K. S., Winnicki, T., & Zuk-Golaszewska, K. (2019). The effects of seeding rate, mineral fertilization and a growth regulator on the economic and energy efficiency of durum wheat production. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Agricultura, 18(3), 133-144.
  3. Constantinescu, E., Niţu, R., & Muscalu, A. (2021). Study regarding the behavior of some varieties of wheat, in ecopedological conditions, from the south-west area of Dolj county. Annals of the University of Craiova - Agriculture, Montanology, Cadastre Series, 51(1), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.52846/AAMC.2021.01.11
  4. DuBois, M., Gilles, K. A., Hamilton, J. K., Rebers, P. A., & Smith, F. (1956). Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry, 28(3), 350-356. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017
  5. Duong, M. V., Chung, J. W., Ha, V. G., Moon, H., Yu, J. K., & So, Y. S. (2024). Prohexadione-calcium mitigates the overgrowth of corn seedlings. Agronomy, 14(2), 371. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14020371
  6. Gao, H., Ma, H., Khan, A., Xia, J., Hao, X., Wang, F., & Luo, H. (2019). Moderate drip irrigation level with low mepiquat chloride application increases cotton lint yield by improving leaf photosynthetic rate and reproductive organ biomass accumulation in arid region. Agronomy, 9(12), 834. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9120834
  7. Ghalkhani, A., Golzardi, F., Khazaei, A., Mahrokh, A., Illés, Á., Bojtor, C., Mousavi, S. M. N., & Széles, A. (2023). Irrigation management strategies to enhance forage yield, feed value, and water-use efficiency of sorghum cultivars. Plants, 12(11), 2154. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12112154
  8. Golada, S. L., Sharma, G. L., & Jain, H. K. (2013). Performance of baby corn (Zea mays) as influenced by spacing, nitrogen fertilization and plant growth regulators under sub humid condition in Rajasthan, India. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(12), 1100-1107. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR12.1920
  9. Han, L. P., Guo, X., Yu, Y., Duan, L., Rao, M. S., & Xie, G. H. (2011). Effect of prohexadione-calcium, maleic hydrazide and glyphosine on lodging rate and sugar content of sweet sorghum. Research on Crops, 12(1), 230-238.
  10. Hedge, J. E., & Hofreiter, B. T. (1962). Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry. R. L. Whistler & J. N. BeMiller (Eds.). New York: Academic Press, 17, 420.
  11. Junior, J. F., Souza, C. A., Pinheiro, M. G., Silva, E. R., & da Silva, A. L. P. (2021). Morpho-physiological responses of maize hybrids as a function prohexadione calcium doses applied in the vegetative phase. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 27(1), 167-178.
  12. Kamran, M., Ahmad, I., Wang, H., Wu, X., Xu, J., Liu, T., Ding, R., & Han, Q. (2018). Mepiquat chloride application increases lodging resistance of maize by enhancing stem physical strength and lignin biosynthesis. Field Crops Research, 224, 148-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.05.011
  13. Kolev, T., & Todorov, Z. (2023). Testing of retardants on durum wheat. Scientific Papers, Series A, Agronomy, 66(1), 378-383.
  14. Liu, M., Feng, N., Zheng, D., & Meng, F. (2025). Comparative study of the mechanisms underlying the effects of prohexadione-calcium and gibberellin on the morphogenesis and carbon metabolism of rice seedlings under NaCl stress. Plants, 14(8), 1240. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14081240
  15. Luo, H., Zhang, Z., Wu, J., Wu, Z., Wen, T., & Tang, F. (2023). Effects of mepiquat chloride and plant population density on leaf photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism in upland cotton. Journal of Cotton Research, 6(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42397-023-00157-8
  16. Miller, G. L. (1959). Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry, 31(3), 426-428. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60147a030
  17. Mirahki, I., Ardakani, M. R., Golzardi, F., Paknejad, F., Mahrokh, A., & Faraji, S. (2023). Yield, water use efficiency and silage feeding value of sorghum cultivars as affected by planting date and planting method. Gesunde Pflanzen, 75(5), 1963-1973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00822-z
  18. Murtza, K., Ishfaq, M., Akbar, N., Hussain, S., Anjum, S. A., Bukhari, N. A., AlGarawi, A. M., & Hatamleh, A. A. (2022). Effect of mepiquat chloride on phenology, yield and quality of cotton as a function of application time using different sowing techniques. Agronomy, 12(5), 1200. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12051200
  19. Mykhalska, L. M., Makoveychuk, T. I., & Schwartau, V. V. (2019). Application of fertilizer megafol and retardants of acylcyclohexadione class on winter wheat crops. Plant Physiology and Genetics, 51(6), 541-548. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2019.06.541
  20. Nikolov, P., & Delchev, G. (2021). Photosynthetic activity and productivity of durum wheat (Triticum durum) affected by certain preparations and various terms of sowing. Agricultural Science and Technology, 13(3), 250-254. https://doi.org/10.15547/ast.2021.03.039
  21. Ozbay, N., & Metin, R. (2020). Effects of prohexadione-calcium application on vegetative and generative growth of pepper plants. p. 573-585. In: A. K. Tiwari (Eds). Advances in Seed Production and Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4198-8_28
  22. Pourali, S., Aghayari, F., Ardakani, M. R., Paknejad, F., & Golzardi, F. (2023). Benefits from intercropped forage sorghum-red clover under drought stress conditions. Gesunde Pflanzen, 75(5), 1769-1780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-023-00833-4
  23. Priyadarshini, M., Santhosh Kumar, G., Nagabhushanam, U., & Pavan Chandra Reddy, K. (2023). Effect of different doses and scheduling time of plant growth regulators and defoliants on growth and yield of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) under high density planting system. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 13(10), 2252-2260. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i102888
  24. Rademacher, W. (2015). Plant growth regulators: Backgrounds and uses in plant production. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 34, 845-872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-015-9541-6
  25. Shallal, I. M., Aboud, N. M., & Hamdan, M. I. (2020). Sorghum genotypic responses to some growth retardants. International Journal of Agricultural & Statistical Sciences, 16, 1311-1315. https://connectjournals.com/03899.2020.16.1311
  26. Storozhyk, L., Humentyk, M., Sviridov, A., & Svyrydova, L. (2022). Optimal time of plant growth regulator application to Sorghum canopy according to BBCH and Kuperman crop growth scales. Plant and Soil Science, 13(4), 45. https://doi.org/10.31548/agr.13(4).2022.46-56
  27. Studstill, S. P., Monfort, W. S., Tubbs, R. S., Jordan, D. L., Hare, A. T., Anco, D. J., Sarver, J. M., Ferguson, J. C., Faske, T. R., Creswell, B. L., & Tyson, W. G. (2020). Influence of prohexadione calcium rate on growth and yield of peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Science, 47(3), 163-172. https://doi.org/10.3146/PS20-11.1
  28. Tavazoh, M., Habibi, D., Golzardi, F., Ilkaee, M. N., & Paknejad, F. (2024). Effect of drought stress on morpho-physiological characteristics, nutritive value, and water-use efficiency of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] varieties under various irrigation systems. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 84, e286121. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.286121
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.

  • Receive Date 14 July 2025
  • Revise Date 15 September 2025
  • Accept Date 27 September 2025
  • First Publish Date 30 September 2025