Investigation of Validity and Possibility of using AgMERRA Networked Dataset in North Khorasan Province

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 PhD student, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran

2 Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Investigating the effect of climate change on agricultural production in spatio-temporal dimension, development and use of crop management decision-support tools, supporting and target agronomic research and policy require a series of accurate and standard meteorological data. The weather station databases are often regional in coverage, and it can have extensive gaps in station coverage over time. It may also contain errors in climate records, station coordinates or elevation. While historical observational data are incomplete or not available in many areas; therefore, gridded weather data are used as an alternative in these areas. An issue is the agreement of gridded with measured weather data and the degree to which this agreement may influence the utility of gridded for agricultural research.  In this study, the possibility of using AgMERRA data series to fill the gap of incomplete and missing historical data in seven synoptic meteorological stations in North Khorasan province in the period (1980-2010) was investigated.
Materials and Methods
Historical daily measured weather data (maximum and minimum air temperature, sunshine hours, relative humidity, and precipitation) for the 1980 to 2010 period, were obtained from the 7 synoptic weather stations (Bojnord, Shirvan, Farooj, Esfarayen, Mane-Semelghan, Raz-Jargalan, Jajarm) across Northern Khorasan.  The robustness of AgMERRA dataset was investigated through statistical validation indices including RMSE (Root Mean Square Error), R2 (Coefficient of Determination), d (d Index of Agreement), NRMSE (Normalized Root Mean Square Error) and MBE (Mean Bias Error). 
Result and Discussion
Strong positive correlations were observed between simulated values ​​of maximum and minimum temperature with observational values (0.81 ≤ r ≤ 0.96). The NRMSE was excellent and good for all stations (7.76 ≤ NRMSE ≤ 15.81). Overall, the high agreement index (d ≥ 0.92), as well as the small values ​​of the MBE, indicated good agreement between the observed and predicted data for the maximum and minimum temperature variable. The solar radiation simulations correlated well with the observed values (0.86 ≤  r ≤ 0.93). The high values for agreement index were obtained in four stations (0.96 ≤ d ≤ 0.98). But the NRMSE for Bojnourd, Esfarayen, and Jajarm stations was ranked in moderate class (20 < NRMSE < 30), and weak class for Mane Semelghan station (NRMSE = 32.31). Other stations (Shirvan, Farooj, and Raz-Jargalan) did not have station observation values for the radiation variable. AgMERRA had a relatively high ability to simulate the relative humidity variable at maximum temperature for Shirvan, Farooj, Esfarayen, and Jajarm stations. The agreement index for these stations was between 0.92 and 0.94, also those NRMSE was ranked in the good class. The coefficient of correlation (r) between the predicted values with the observational data of the relative humidity at maximum temperature )Rhstmax(  ranged from 0.40 to 0.70. The low r value can be related to the topographic conditions and low vegetation of these areas. AgMERRA daily precipitation data had excellent NRMSE. Due to the weak correlation between the predicted daily precipitation data and the observational data, the total monthly precipitation of each station was examined, which showed better correlation and NRMSE than of the daily precipitation. Considering the monthly time scale compared to the daily, NRMSE reduced from a high class to a good class, also a strong correlation was obtained especially for Raz- Jarglan (0.88), Esfarayen (0.84), and Mane Semolghan (0.80) stations.
Conclusions
 AgMERRA gridded dataset for maximum and minimum temperature, solar radiation excluding daily precipitation and relative humidity at maximum temperature showed high accordance (d> 0.92 and NRMSE <30%) and strong correlation (0.81 ≤ r ≤ 0.96) with station data in arid, semiarid, temperate, cold and mountainous areas of North Khorasan province.  However, a more strong correlation was obtained when daily precipitation data were aggregated into monthly data. In general, the validation results of the AgMERRA simulated values with 7 synoptic stations indicated its robustness and power to produce meteorological data series. So AgMERRA data series can be used for climate studies, analysis, planning and decision making in agriculture section in North Khorasan province.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Amatya, D. M., Muwamba, A., Panda, S., Callahan, T., Harder, S., and Pellett, C. A. 2018. Assessment of Spatial and Temporal Variation of Potential Evapotranspiration Estimated by Four Methods for South Carolina. The Journal of South Carolina Water Resources 5 (5): 3-24. Available from https://doi.org/10.34068/jscwr.05.01
  2. Angstrom, A. 1924. Solar and terrestrial radiation. Report to the international commission for solar research on actinometric investigations of solar and atmospheric radiation. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 50 (210): 121-126. Available from https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49705021008
  3. Bannayan, M., Sanjani, S., and Alizadeh, A. 2010. Association between climate indices , aridity index , and rainfed crop yield in northeast of Iran. 118: 105-114. Available from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.04.011
  4. Battisti, R., Bender, F. D., and Sentelhas, P. C. 2019. Assessment of different gridded weather data for soybean yield simulations in Brazil. January. Available from https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2383-y
  5. Bender, F. D., and Sentelhas, P. C. 2018. Solar Radiation Models and Gridded Databases to Fill Gaps in Weather Series and to Project Climate Change in Brazil Solar Radiation Models and Gridded Databases to Fill Gaps in Weather Series and to Project Climate Change in Brazil. Advances in Meteorology, July, 15. Available from https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6204382
  6. Bosilovich, M. G., Akella, S., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Gelaro, R., Kovach, R., Liu, Q., Molod, A., Norris, P., Wargan, K., Chao, W., Reichle, R., Takacs, L., Vikhliaev, Y., Bloom, S., Collow, A., Firth, S., Labow, G., …and Koster, R. D. 2015. Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation, Volume 43 MERRA-2: Initial Evaluation of the Climate. Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation, 43 (November).
  7. Bristow, K. L., and Campbell, G. S. 1984. On the relationship between incoming solar radiation and daily maximum and minimum temperature. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 31 (2): 159-166.
  8. Burroughs, W. 2003. Climate into the 21st Century. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Castellanos-acuna, D., and Hamann, A. 2020. A cross-checked global monthly weather station database for precipitation covering the period 1901-2010. March 2019, 1-11. Available from https://doi.org/10.1002/gdj3.88
  10. Geng, S., Vries, F. W. T. P. de, and Supit, I. 1986. “A simple method for generating daily rainfall data.” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 36 (4): 363-376.
  11. Ghazanfari Moghadam, M. S., Alizadeh, M., Mousavi, M., Farid Hoseini, A., and Bannayan, M. 2011. Comparison the PERSIANN Model with the Interpolation Method to Estimate Daily Precipitation. Journal of Water and Soil 25 (1): 207-215. Available from https://doi.org/10.22067/ifstrj.v1395i0.51210
  12. Joyce, R. J., Janowiak, J. E., Arkin, P. A., and Xie, P. 2004. CMORPH: A method that produces global precipitation estimates from passive microwave and infrared data at high spatial and temporal resolution. Journal of Hydrometeorology 5 (3): 487–503. Available from https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2004)0052.0.CO;2
  13. Júnior, R. S. N., Fraisse, C., Cerbaro, V. A., Karrei, M. A. Z., and Guindin-garcia, N. 2019. Evaluation of the Hargreaves-Samani Method for Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration with Ground and Gridded Weather Data Sources. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 35 (5): 823-835. Available from https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.13363
  14. Koocheki, A., Nassiri-mahallati, M., and Jafari, L. 2016. Evaluation of Climate Change Effect on Agricultural Production of Iran I . Predicting the Future Agroclimatic Conditions. May 2020.
  15. Lashkari, A., Bannayan, M., and Koochaki, A. and et al. 2016. Applicability of AgMERRA forcing dataset forgap-filling of in-situ meteorological observation, Case Study: Mashhad Plain. Journal of Water and Soil 29 (6): 1749-1758.
  16. Lopes, V. L. 1996. On the effect of uncertainty in spatial distribution of rainfall on catchment modelling. Catena, 28 (1-2): 107-119. Available from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(96)00030-6
  17. Mahmood, R., Foster, S. A., and Logan, D. 2006. The GeoProfile metadata, exposure of instruments, and measurement bias in climatic record revisited. International Journal of Climatology 26 (8): 1091-1124. Available from https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1298
  18. Mourtzinis, S., Edreira, J. I. R., Conley, S. P., and Grassini, P. 2016. From grid to field: Assessing quality of gridded weather data for agricultural applications. European Journal of Agronomy. Available from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.10.013
  19. Prescott, J. 1940. Evaporation from a water surface in relation to solar radiation. Trans and Proc Roy Soc South Australia, 64 (1): 114-118.
  20. Razavi, A. R., Nasiri Mahallati, M., Koochaki, A., and Beheshti, A. 2018. Applicability of AgMERRA for Gap-Filling of Afghanistan in-situ Temperature and Precipitation Data A. Journal of Water and Soil 32 (3): 601-616. Available from https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v32i3.68501
  21. Richardson, C. W., and Wright, D. A. 1984. WGEN: A Model for- Generating Daily Weather Variables. , Vol. ARS-8, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC, USA.
  22. Rienecker, M. M., Suarez, M. J., and Gelaro, R. 2011. MERRA: NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications. Journal of Climate 24 (14): 3624-3648.
  23. Ruane, A. C., Goldberg, R., and Chryssanthacopoulos, J. 2015. Climate forcing datasets for agricultural modeling: merged products for gap-filling and historical climate series estimation. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 200: 233-248.
  24. van Wart, J., Grassini, P., and Cassman, K. G. 2013. Impact of derived global weather data on simulated crop yields. Global Change Biology 19 (12): 3822-3834.
  25. Van Wart, J., Grassini, P., Yang, H., Claessens, L., Jarvis, A., and Cassman, K. G. 2015. Creating long-term weather data from thin air for crop simulation modeling. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 209-210, 49-58. Available from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.02.020
  26. Wallach D., Makowski D., and J. J. W. 2006. Working with dynamic crop models.1st Edidion (D. W. D. M. J. Jones (ed.)).
  27. White, J. W., Hoogenboom, G., Stackhouse, P. W., and Hoell, J. M. 2008. Evaluation of NASA satellite- and assimilation model-derived long-term daily temperature data over the continental US. 148: 1574-1584. Available from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.05.017
  28. Willmott, C. J., Ackleson, S. G., Davis, R. E., Feddema, J. J., Klink, K. M., Legates, D. R., O’Donnell, J., and Rowe, C. M. 1985. Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models. Journal of Geophysical Research 90 (C5): 8995. Available from https://doi.org/10.1029/jc090ic05p08995
  29. Xavier, A. C., King, C. W., and Scanlon, B. R. 2015. Daily gridded meteorological variables in Brazil (1980-2013). International Journal of Climatology 36 (6): 2644-2659.
  30. Yaghoobi, F., Bannayan, M., and Asadi, G. 2018. Evaluation of Grided AgMERRA Weather Data for Simulation of Water Requirement and Yield of Rainfed Wheat in Khorasan Razavi Province F. 32 (2): 415-431. Available from https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v32i2.68948
  31. Yaghoubi, F., Bannayan, M., and Asadi, G. A. 2020. Performance of predicted evapotranspiration and yield of rainfed wheat in the northeast Iran using gridded AgMERRA weather data. International Journal of Biometeorology. Available from https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-020-01931-y
CAPTCHA Image