The Study of Nitrogen Efficiency Indices of Canola (Brassica napus L.) under Different Green Manure Crops and Nitrogen Sources

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Kh Dabighi
• E Fateh
• A Aynehband

Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz

10.22067/gsc.v15i2.51733

Abstract

Introduction Green manure is a crop used primarily as a soil amendment and a nutrient source for future crops. Leguminous green manure may add N to crop systems through biological fixation, and the slow release of N from decomposing green manure residues may be well timed with plant uptake. Leguminous and non-leguminous plants are used as green manures. Leguminous plants can form symbiotic associations with Rhizobium bacteria in order to atmospheric N fixation. This fact causes that the green manures, which their principal component are leguminous plant residue, added more nitrogen to the soil compared to non-legume. Muurinen et al. (2007) reported that strong N translocation from vegetative parts of the main shoot in wheat, which exhibited higher competition for N between vegetative and reproductive organs. Therefore, improved understanding of plant N requirements and dynamics, particularly biomass production efficiency (BPE) from vegetative parts among species and cultivars, is needed to determine better nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). So that the objective of this study was to determine the effects of legume and non-legume green manure crops in combination with different N fertilizer rates on nitrogen efficiency indices of canola.
Materials and Methods In order to study the effect of different green manure and nitrogen sources on nitrogen efficiency indices of canola, a field experiment was conducted in the experimental farm of Agricultural Faculty of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz during 2013-2014 growing season. The experimental was carried out as split plot based on randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The main plot was different green manure including millet, barley, mungbean, intercropping of millet and mungbean, and fallow (without green manure application). The subplot treatments were different nitrogen sources at three levels including no nitrogen fertilizer (Control), 50 % chemical nitrogen + biological nitrogen (Nitroxin) and 100 % chemical nitrogen. Nitrogen fertilizer was applied 200 kg per hectare in the form of urea. The plots of green manure were established on 6 Sep. 2010 and incorporated to the soil on 17 Oct. 2013. Then canola (cv. Hyola401) was planted on 10 Nov. 2013 and was harvested on 21 Apr. 2014. Each plot size was 6 m2 (2 m × 3 m) that consisted of 6 rows of canola plants. Grain yield was determined by harvesting from a 2 m2 area in each plot. All dry vegetative samples and also grains were first ground and then plant N concentration was determined by standard macro-Kjeldahl procedure. N content was calculated by multiplying the N concentration by dry weight. Analysis of variance was used to test the significance of data and means were compared with LSD test.
Results and Discussions The results showed that the increasing nitrogen application had negative effect on efficiency indices except of nitrogen reliance index (NRI). The highest nitrogen reliance index (NRI) (0.46 kg per kg plant) was obtained at control (without green manure and 100% chemical nitrogen) and the lowest (0.16 kg per kg plant) was revealed at mungbean intercropping with integrated nitrogen application. The highest nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) (21.4 kg per kg), and nitrogen uptake efficiency (NUE) (1.04 kg per kg) were obtained at mungbean green manure and no nitrogen fertilizer, respectively. The highest nitrogen agronomic efficiency (NAE) (24.98 kg per kg) was revealed at millet-mungbean intercropping and nitrogen integrated management. Totally the results indicated the positive effects of biological and chemical combined fertilizer and green manure plants on yield increment and efficiency indices, and decreasing of dependency on chemical inputs that it is in the way and the goal of sustainable agriculture.

Keywords

• Biological nitrogen fertilizer
• Green manure
• Nitrogen efficiency index
• Nitroxin
• Seed yield

20.1001.1.20081472.1396.15.2.15.1

---

References

1. Ahmad, G., Jan, A., Arif, M., Jan, M. T., and Khattak, R. A. 2007. Influence of nitrogen and sulfur fertilization on quality of canola (Brassica napus L.) under rainfed conditions. Journal of Zhejiang University 8(10): 731-737.

2. Ali ehyaei, M., and Behbahanizade, A. A. 1993. Methods of soil analysis. Technical publication. Soil and Water Research Institute. Tehran. Iran. 1(893): 76PP. (in Persian).

3. Alyari, H., and Sekari, F. 2000. Oil seed crops agronomy and physiology.. Amidi Tabriz Press. 182 P.

4. Aminpanah, H. 2013. Effect of nitrogen rate on seed yield, protein and oil content of two canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica 101(2): 183-190.

5. Aynehband, A., Asadi, S., and Rahnama, A. 2014. Nitrogen use efficiency assessment under intra-and inter-specific competitions stress. Journal of Plant Physiology and Breeding 4(2): 9-21.

6. Aynehband, A. 2007. Ecology of agricultural systems. Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz Press. 374 P.

7. Baligar, V.C., and Bennett, O.L., 1986. Outlook on fertilizer use efficiency in the tropics. Fertilizer Research 10: 83-96.

8. Dawson, J. C., Huggins, D. R., and Jones, S. S. 2008. Characterizing nitrogen use efficiency in natural and agricultural ecosystems to improve the performance of cereal crops in low-input and organic agriculture systems. Field Crops Research 107: 89-101.

9. Desta, Y., Habtegebrial, K., and Weldu, Y. 2015. Inoculation, phosphorous and zinc fertilization effects on nodulation, yield and nutrient uptake of Faba bean (Vicia faba L.) grown on calcaric cambisol of semiarid Ethiopia. Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management 6(1): 9-15.

10. Dobermann, A., Witt, C., Abdulrachman, S., Gines, H.C., Nagarajan, R., Son, T.T., Tan, P.C., Wong, G.H., Chien, N.V., Thoma, V.T.K., Phung, C.V., Stalin, P., Muthukrishnan, P., Ravi, V., Babu, M., Simbahan, G.C., and dviento, M.A.A., 2003a .Soil fertility and indigenous nutrient supply in irrigated rice domains of Asia. Agronomy Journal 95: 913-922.

11. Erisman, J. W. 2004. The Nanjing declaration on management of reactive nitrogen. Bioscience 54: 4286-4287.

12. Fageria, N. K. 2009. The use of nutrients in crop plant. CRC Press, New York, 430 P.

13. Gan, Y., Malhi, S. S., Brandt, S., Katepa-Mupondwa, F., and Stevenson, C. 2008. Nitrogen use efficiency and n uptake of juncea canola under diverse environments. Agronomy Journal 100: 285-295.

14. Gerami, F., Aynehband, A., and Fateh, E. 2014. Comparing the effect of different green manure crops and nitrogen rates on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by nitrogen efficiency indices. The Plant Production 36 (4): 135-148. (in Persian with English abstract).

15. Ghavampoor, M., Moosavi, S. G. H., and Seghatoleslami, M. J. 2015. Yield, morphological traits and nitrogen use efficiency of Eruca sativa as affected by irrigation, plant density and nitrogen fertilization. Biological Forum- An International Journal 7(1): 316-325.

16. Haile, D., Nigussie, D., and Ayana, A. 2012. Nitrogen use efficiency of bread wheat: Effects of nitrogen rate and time of application. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 12 (3): 389-409.

17. Halvorson, A. D., Wienhold, B. J., and Black, A. L. 2001. Tillage and nitrogen fertilization influence grain and soil nitrogen in an annual cropping system. Agronomy Journal 93: 836-841.

18. Hamzei, J. 2012. Seed N concentration, nitrogen use efficiency and growth of barley under combinations of bio and chemical N fertilizer application. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences 3 (1): 70-76.

19. Hocking, P. J., Randall, P. J., and DeMarco, D. 1997. The response of dryland canola to nitrogen fertilizer: partitioning and mobilization of dry matter and nitrogen, and nitrogen effects on yield components. Field Crops Research 54: 201-220.

20. Hosseini, R. S., Gashi, S., Soltani, A., Calateh, M., and Zahed, M. 2013. The effect of nitrogen fertilizer on wheat nitrogen use efficiency measures. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 11(2): 300-306. (in Persian).

21. Huggins, D. R., and Pan, W. L. 1993. Nitrogen efficiency component analysis: an evaluation of cropping system differences in productivity. Journal of Agronomy 85: 898-905.

22. Jackson, G. D. 2000. Effect of nitrogen and sulfur on canola yield and nutrient uptake. Agronomy 92: 644-649.

23. Jafari, N., Esfahani, M., Falah, A. R., Mohsen Abadi, G. R., and Kafi Ghasemi, A. 2012. Effects of urea, zinc sulphate fertilizers and Azotobacter and Azospirillum inoculant application on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science 43 (4): 551-560. (in Persian).

24. Jalali, A. H., and Bahrani, M. J. 2014. Effect of crop residue and nitrogen fertilizer on nitrogen use efficiency in corn (Zea mays L.) production. Agronomy Journal 102: 197-204.

25. Joudi, F., Tobeh, A., Ebadi, A., Mostafaee, H., and Jamaati-e-Somarin, S. H. 2011. Nitrogen effects on yield, yield components, agronomical and recovery nitrogen use efficiency in lentil genotypes. Electeronic Journal of Crop Prouduction 4 (4): 39-50.

26. Keivanrad, S., and Zandi, P. 2014. Effect of nitrogen levels on growth, yield and oil quality of Indian mustard grown under different plant densities. Agronomical and Qualitative Features of Indian Mustard 1(157): 81-95.

27. Ladha, J.K., Pathak, H., Krupnik, T.J., Six, J., and Kessel, C. 2005. Efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen in cereal production: retrospects and prospects. Advances in Agronomy 87: 85-156.

28. Majdi Nasab, H., Siadat, S. A., Naderi, A., Lak, S., and Modhej, A. 2015. Effect of drought stress and nitrogen levels on yield, yield components and harvest index of canola genotypes under Shoushtar environmental conditions. Journal of Renewable Natural Resources Bhutan 3 (5): 129-139.

29. Mirzaei, A., Vazan, S., and Naseri, R. 2010. Response of yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) to seed inoculation with Azotobacter and Azospirillum and different nitrogen levels under dry land condition. World Applied Sciences Journal 11 (10): 1287-1291.

30. Mirzashahi, K., and Hossainpour, M. 2014. The effect of nitrogen fertilization management on grain yield and nitrogen efficiency indices in corn. Agronomy Journal 102: 31-40.

31. Mohammadi, G.H., Safari Poor, M., Ghobadi, M. E., and Najaphy, A. 2015. Corn yield and quality and weed growth under different nitrogen levels by application of legume and non-legume green manures. Sciences Agricultural and Sustainable Production 25(1): 45- 64. (in Persian with English abstract).

32. Muurinen, S., Kleemola, J., and Peltonen-Sainio, P. 2007. Accumulation and translocation of nitrogen in spring cereal cultivars differing in nitrogen use efficiency. Agronomy Journal 99: 441-449.

33. Naing, A., Banterng, P., Polthanee, A., and Trelo-Ges, V. 2010. The effect of different fertilizers management strategies on growth and yield of upland black glutinous rice and soil property. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 9 (7): 414-422.

34. Norton, R., Walker, C., and Farlow, C. 2015. Nitrogen removal and use on a long-term fertilizer experiment. Australia. Web site www.agronomy2015.com.au.

35. Pankhurst, C. E., Stirling, G. R., Magarey, R.C., Blair, B.C., Holt, J.A., Bell, M.J. and Garside, A.L. 2005 Quantification of the effects of rotation breaks on soil biological properties and their impact on yield decline in sugarcane. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 37: 1121-1130.

36. Powers, L. E., and Mcsorley, R. 2000. Ecological principles of agriculture. Thomson Learning Publishing. New York.

37. Premi, O. P., Kandpal, B. K., Rathore Shekhawat, S. S., and Chauhan, J. S. 2013. Green manuring, mustard residue recycling and fertilizer application affects productivity and sustainability of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) in Indian semi-arid tropics. Industrial Crops and Products 41: 423-429.

38. Rahimizadeh, M., Kashani, A., Zare-Feizabadi, A., Koocheki, A. R., and Nassiri-Mahallati, M. 2010. Nitrogen use efficiency of wheat as affected by preceding crop, application rate of nitrogen and crop residues. Australian Journal of Crop Science 4(5): 363-368.

39. Rathke, G. W., Behrens, T., and Diepenbrock, W. 2006. Integrated nitrogen management strategies to improve seed yield, oil content and nitrogen efficiency of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.): A review. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 117: 90-108.

40. Ryan, J., Pala, M., Masri, S., Singh, M., and Harris, H. 2008. Rain fed wheat-based rotations under Mediterranean conditions: Crop sequences, nitrogen fertilization, and stubble grazing in relation to grain and straw quality. European Agronomy Journal 28:112-118.

41. Seyed Sharifi, R. 2007. Industrial Plants. Mohaghegh Ardabili Press. 432 pp.

42. Seyed Sharifi, R., Seyedi, M. N., and Zaefizadeh, M. 2011. Influence of various levels of nitrogen fertilizer on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency in canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Journal of Crops Improvement 13(2): 51-60.

43. Shehu, H. E. 2014. Uptake and agronomic efficiencies of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). American Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilization Technology 4(2): 41-56.

44. Silespour, M., Jafari, P., and Mollahosein, H. 2009. Effect of drought stress on corn. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2(2): 32-39.

45. Yasari, E., and Patwardhan, M. 2007. Effects of Azotobacter and Azospirillum inoculants and chemical fertilizers on growth and productivity of canola (Brassica napus L.). Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 6(1): 77-82.

46. Zhao, R. F., Chen, X. P., Zhang, F. S., Zhang, H., Schroder, J., and Romheld, V. 2006. Fertilization and nitrogen balance in a wheat-maize rotation system in North China. Agronomy Journal 98: 935-945.