Simulating the Effects of Climate Change on Phenology and Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.) and Possible Adaptation Strategies under the Climatic Conditions of Kermanshah

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• F Mondani ¹
• P Karami ²
• R Ghobadi ³

¹ Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

² MSc Student in Agroecology, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

³ PhD Graduate in Crop Physiology, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

10.22067/jcesc.2023.81417.1232

Abstract

Introduction
Global warming directly affects agricultural production and food security (Ainsworth & Ort, 2010). Temperature controls the rate of plant metabolic processes that ultimately affect biomass production and grain yield (Hay & Walker, 1981). Although farmers are not able to control the climatic conditions, management and changes in factors such as irrigation, soil, crop varieties, activities, and technologies used in the cultivation of crops can reduce the harmful effects of climate change (Moradi et al., 2014). One of the reliable approaches to studying the effects of climate change on agricultural production is using crop growth models. The present study was conducted to simulate the effects of climate change on phonological stages and yield of maize and to investigate the possibility of mitigating the negative effects of climate change on maize by changing the sowing date and selecting suitable cultivars as management strategies for adaptation to climate change in Kermanshah region.
Materials and Methods 
The study was conducted in Kermanshah region conditions. The evaluated traits included days from the sowing date to anthesis, days from the sowing date to physiological maturity, total dry weight, and grain yield. In general, the results of the evaluations showed that the CERES-Maize model can accurately predict the growth and yield of maize cultivars (SC704, Simon, BC678) in different soil moisture conditions. After ensuring acceptable agreement between simulated values with observed values, the evaluated model was used to study the effects of climate change on maize production in the near future (2021-2050) and the far future (2051-2080) climate change according to RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios and comparing them with baseline conditions (1981–2010). The average of 17 general circulation models was used to simulate meteorological parameters under climate change conditions. The common sowing date for maize in the Kermanshah region is May 5. In this study sowing dates of May 5 and April 26 as early sowing dates, April 15 as the common sowing dates, and May 25 and June 4 as the late sowing dates, and maize cultivars SC704, BC678, and Simon were considered as adaptation strategies to climate change.
Results and Discussion
The results of simulation showed that regardless of cultivar and sowing date, traits of days from sowing date to anthesis, days from sowing date to physiological maturity, total dry weight and grain yield in the near future climate change in the scenario RCP4.5 varied as -2, -1.5, 2.7, and 3.3% and in the RCP8.5 scenario varied as, -2.9, -2.8, -0.66, and -3.6% compared to baseline conditions, respectively. These values for the RCP4.5 scenario in the far future climate change condition were -5.2, -5.4, -7.1, and -16.2 and for the RCP8.5 scenario were -8.8, -9.8, -23.1, and -45.83%, respectively. In both near and far future climate changes and under both scenarios, by sowing the studied cultivars at late dates (May 15 and May 25) compared to the early dates (April 15 and April 25) and common date (May 5), the length of the developmental period was shorter but other traits such as total dry weight and grain yield were higher. Among the studied cultivars, in both future climate changes and scenarios, the Simon cultivar had the highest grain yield. The highest duration of developmental stages and total dry weight belonged to SC704.
Conclusion
In general, if any of the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios occur in the near and far future climate change periods, the sowing of the Simon cultivar should be in late dates on May 25 and will have the highest grain yield. Therefore, it can suggest as a suitable strategy to reduce the negative effects of climate change on maize production in the Kermanshah region.

Keywords

• Adaptation strategy
• CERES-Maize model
• Cultivar
• Sowing date

20.1001.1.20081472.1402.21.4.1.3

Main Subjects

• Crop yield

---

©2024 The author(s). This article is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

References

Ainsworth, E. A., & Ort, D. R. (2010). How do we improve crop production in a warming world? Plant Physiology, 154(2), 526-530. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.161349

Alexandrov, V. A., & Hoogenboom, G. (2000). The impact of climate variability and change crop yield in Bulgaria. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 104(4), 315-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1923(00)00166-0

Amouzou, K. A., Lamers, J. P., Naab, J. B., Borgemeister, C., Vlek, P., & Land Becker, M. (2019). Climate change impact on water-and nitrogen-use efficiencies and yields of maize and sorghum in the northern Benin dry savanna, West Africa. Field Crops Research, 235, 104-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.02.021

Araya, A., Kisekka, I., Lin, X., Prasad, P. V., Gowda, P. H., Rice, C., & Andales, A. (2017). Evaluating the impact of future climate change on irrigated maize production in Kansas. Climate Risk Management, 17, 139-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2017.08.001

Bowling, L. C. M., Widhalm, M., Cherkauer, K. A., Beckerman, J., Brouder, S., Buzan, J., Doering, O., Dukes, J., Ebner, P., & Frankenburger, J. (2018). Indiana’s Agriculture in a Changing Climate: A Report from the Indiana Climate Change Impacts Assessment. Agriculture Reports. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284316778

Cairns, J. E., Crossa, J., Zaidi, P. H., Grudloyma, P., Sanchez, C., Araus, J. L., Thaitad, S., Makumbi, D., Magorokosho, C., Bänziger, M., & Menkir, A. (2013). Identification of drought, heat, and combined drought and heat tolerant donors in maize. Crop Science, 53(4), 1335-1346. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2012.09.0545

Crafts-Brander, S. J., & Salvucci, M. E. (2002). Sensitivity of photosynthesis in a C₄ plant, maize to heat stress. Plant Physiology, 129(4), 1773-1780. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.002170

Deryng, D., Elliott, J., Folberth, C., Müller, C., Pugh, T. A. M., & Boote, K. J. (2016). Regional disparities in the beneficial effects of rising CO₂ concentrations on crop water productivity. Nature Climate Change, 6(8), 786-790. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2995

Dias, M. P. N. M., Navaratne, C. M., Weerasinghe, K. D. N., & Hettiarachchi, R. H. A. N. (2016). Application of DSSAT crop simulation model to identify the changes of rice growth and yield in Nilwala river basin for mid-centuries under changing climatic conditions. Procedia food science, 6, 159-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2016.02.039

Doorenbos, J., & Kassam, A. H. (1979). Yield Response to Water. FAO. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 33. FAO, Rome, Italy.

Hatfield, J. L., & Prueger, J. H. (2015). Temperature extremes: effect on plant growth and development. Weather and Climate Extremes, 10, 4-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2015.08.001

Hay, R. K. M., & Walker, A. J. (1989). An Introduction to the Physiology of Crop Yield. Longman Scientific and Technical Press Inc., New York.

Hoogenboom, G., Jones, J. W., Wilkens, P. W., Porter, C. H., Boote, K. J., Hunt, L. A., Singh, U., Lizaso, J. L., White, J. W., Uryasev, O., Ogoshi, R., Koo, J., Shelia, V., & Tsuji, G. Y. (2015). Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) Version 4.6 (www.DSSAT.net). DSSAT Foundation, Prosser, Washington.

Islama, A., Ahuja, R. L., Garciab, L. A., Ma, L., Saseendran, A. S., & Trout, T. J. (2012). Modeling the impacts of climate change on irrigated maize production in the Central Great Plains. Agricaltural Water Management, 110(C), 94-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.04.004

Khabba, S., Ledent, J. F., & Lahrouni, A. (2001). Maize ear temperature. European Journal of Agronomy, 14(3), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(00)00095-2

Li, X., Takahashi, T., Suzuki, N., & Kaiser, H. M. (2011). The impact of climate change on maize yields in the United States and China. Agricultural Systems, 104, 348-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.12.006

Liu, Z., Hubbard, K. G., Lin, X., & Yang, X. (2013). Negative effects of climate warming on maize yield are reversed by the changing of sowing date and cultivar selection in Northeast China. Global Change Biology, 19(11), 3481-3492. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12324

Lobell, D. B., & Burke, M. B. (2010). On the use of statistical models to predict crop yield responses to climate change. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 150(11), 1443-1452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.07.008

MarkSim. (2018). http://gismap.ciat.cgiar.org/MarkSimGCM

Meza, F. J., Silva, D., & Vigil, H. (2008). Climate change impacts on irrigated maize in Mediterranean climates: Evaluation of double cropping as an emerging adaptation alternative. Agricultural Systems, 98(1), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2008.03.005

Mondani, F. (2018). Simulation of Nitrogen Fertilizer Effect on Maize (Zea maize) Production by CERES-Maize Model under Kermanshah Climate Condition. Water and Soil, 31(6), 1665-1678. https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v31i6.61895. (in Persian with English abstract).

Mondani, F., Karami, P., & Ghobadi, R. (2021). Simulation of moisture regimes effect on maize (Zea mays) growth and yield in Kermanshah region by CERES-Maize model. Crop Science Research in Arid Regions, 3(1), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.22034/csrar.2021.280069.1091. (in Persian with English abstract).

Moradi, R., Koocheki, A., & Nassiri Mahallati, M. (2014). Effect of Climate Change on Maize Production and Shifting of Planting Date as Adaptation Strategy in Mashhad. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 23(4), 111-130. (in Persian with English abstract).

Muchow, R. C., Sinclair, T. R., & Bennett, J. M. (1990). Temperature and solar radiation effects on potential maize yield across locations. Agronomy Journal, 82(2), 338-343. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200020033x

Ozkan, B., & Akcaoz, H. (2002). Impacts of climate factors on yields for selected crops in southern Turkey. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 7, 367-380. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024792318063

Rahimi-Moghaddam, S., Kambouzia, J., & Deihimfard, R. (2018). Adaptation strategies to lessen negative impact of climate change on grain maize under hot climatic conditions: A model-based assessment. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 253, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.01.032

RCP. (2014). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representative_Concentration_Pathway

Rezaei, E. E., Webber, H., Gaiser, T., Naab, J., & Ewert, F. (2015). Heat stress in cereals: mechanisms and modelling. European Journal of Agronomy, 64, 98-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2014.10.003

Rosenzweig, C., & Tubiello, F. N. (2007). Adaptation and mitigation strategies in agriculture: an analysis of potential synergies. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 12, 855-873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-007-9103-8

Rowhani, P., Lobell, D. B., Linderman, M., & Ramankutty, N. (2011). Climate variability and crop production in Tanzania. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 151(4), 449-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.12.002

Sarker, K. K., Akanda, M. A., Biswas, S. H., Roy, D. K., Khatun, A., & Goftar, M. A. (2016). Field performance of alternate wetting and drying furrow irrigation on tomato crop growth, yield, water use efficiency, quality and profitability. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 15(10), 2380-2392. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61370-9

Schoper, J. B., Lambert, R. J., & Vasilas, B. L. (1987). Pollen viability, pollen shedding and combining ability for tassel heat tolerance in maize. Crop Science, 27(1), 27-31. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1987.0011183X002700010007x

Shiri, M. (2018). The mitigation of climate change effect on maize grain yield by changing of planting date in Moghan. Cereal Research, 7(4), 563-578. https://doi.org/10.22124/c.2018.5574.1216. (in Persian with English abstract).

Smit, B., & Skinner, M. W. (2002). Adaptation options in agriculture to climate change: a typology. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change, 7(1), 85-114. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015862228270

Southworth, J., Randolph, J. C., Habeck, M., Doering, O. C., Pfeifer, R. A. Rao, D. G., & Johnston, J. J. (2000). Consequences of future climate change and changing climate variability on maize yields in the midwestern United States. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 82, 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00223-1

Srivastava, A. K., Mboh, C. M., Zhao, G., Gaiser, T., & Ewert, F. (2018). Climate change impact under alternate realizations of climate scenarios on maize yield and biomass in Ghana. Agricultural Systems, 159, 157-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.03.011

Teixeira, E. I., Fischer, G., Velthuizen, H., Walter, C., & Ewert, F. (2013). Global hot-spots of heat stress on agricultural crops due to climate change. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 170, 206-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.09.002

Tingem, M., & Rivington, M. (2009). Adaptation for crop agriculture to climate change in Cameroon: Turning on the heat. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 14, 153-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-008-9156-3

Trnka, M., Dubrovsky, M., & Ekzalud, Z. (2004). Climate change impacts and adaptation strategies in spring barley production in the Czech Republic. Climatic Change, 64, 227-255. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000024675.39030.96

Tubiello, F. N., Jagtap, S., Rosenzweig, C., Goldberg, R., & Jones, J. W. (2002). Effects of climate change on US crop production from the National Assessment. Simulation results using two different GCM scenarios. Part I: Wheat, Potato, Corn, and Citrus. Climate research, 20(3), 259-270. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr020259

Tubiello, F. N., Soussana, J. F. O., & Howden, S. M. (2007). Crop and pasture response to climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(50), 19686-19690. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701728104

Ummenhofer, C., Xu, H., Twine, T., Girvetz, E., McCarthy, H., Chhetri, N., & Nicholas, K. (2015). How climate change affects extremes in maize and wheat yield in two cropping regions. Journal of Climate, 28(12), 4653-4687. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00326.1

Wang, Z. R., Rui, Y. K., Shen, J. B., & Zhang, F. S. (2008). Effects of N fertilizer on root growth in Zea mays L. seedlings. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(4), 677-682. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2008064-360

Wheeler, T., & Vonbraun, J. (2013). Climate change impacts on global food security. Science, 341(6145), 508-513. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239402

Zheng, B., Chenu, K., Dreccer, M. F., & Chapman, S. C. (2012). Breeding for the future: what are the potential impacts of future frost and heat events on sowing and flowering time requirements for Australian bread wheat (Triticum aestivium) varieties? Global Change Biology, 18(9), 2899-2914. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02724.x