Growth Analysis of Two Cultivars of Lentil Using Regression Modeling

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Lorestan University

2 Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz

Abstract

Growth analysis is a valuable method in the study of quantitative of growth, development and crop production. In order to study the physiological growth indices of lentil plant under dry- farming conditions, an experiment was carried out as a randomized complete block design with three replications at the Agricultural Research Station of Lorestan University during 2010. In this experiment two cultivars were used including Gachsaran and Philip, that are appropriate and commonly in the area cultivating. In order to have more accurate study, Growing Degree Day (GDD) index was used for fitting growth curves, and then appropriate model was selected for each growth index using non-linear regression models. The results of the growth indices showed that Gachsaran cultivar has higher priority than Philip cultivar in leaf area index, but Philip cultivar had higher priority than Gachsaran cultivar in crop growth rate, net assimilation rate and dry matter production. Relative growth rate was similar in both cultivars. In total, growth characteristics of Gachsaran cultivar leading to higher seed yield and growth characteristics of Philip variety leading to produce more biological yield.

Keywords


1- حجت، س. س. 1384. بررسی تحمل به سرما در ژرم پلاسم عدس جهت کاشت در مناطق کوهستانی ایران. مجموعه مقالات اولین همایش ملی حبوبات. 485-483.
2- صفی‌خانی، م. و ب. واعظی. 1381. گچساران، رقم عدس معرفی‌شده برای مناطق گرمسیری و سردسیری کشور. مجموعه مقالات هفتمین کنگره زراعت و اصلاح نباتات ایران، کرج.
3- کانونی، ه.، م. ر. شهاب، م. کامل، ح. مصطفایی، ع. ر. طالعی، و م. ر. قنادها. 1384. تجزیة اثرات اصلی جمع‏پذیر و اثرات متقابل ضرب‏پذیر (AMMI) برای عملکرد دانه ژنوتیپ‏های عدس در محیط های دیم. مجموعه مقالات اولین همایش ملی حبوبات.
4- کوچکی، ع. و غ. سرمدنیا. 1384. فیزیولوژی گیاهان زراعی (ترجمه). انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی مشهد.
5- کوچکی، ع. و م. بنایان اول. 1375. زراعت حبوبات. انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی مشهد.
6- محمودی، ع. ا. 1384. ارزیابی ژتوتیپ‏های پیشرفته عدس در کشت پاییزه و بهاره در شرایط دیم. چکیده مقالات اولین همایش ملی حبوبات. پژوهشکده علوم گیاهی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد.
7- Birch, C. P. D. 1999. A new generalized logistic sigmoid growth equation compared with the Richards growth equation. Annals of Botany. 83: 713-723.
8- Blackman, V. H. 1919. The compound interest low and plant growth. Annals of Botany. 33:353-360.
9- Briggs, G. E., F. Kidd, and C. West. 1920. Quantitative analysis of plant growth. Annals of Applied Biology. 7:103-123.
10- Chiariello, N. R., H. A. Mooney, and K. Williams. 1989. Growth; carbon allocation and cost of plant tissues. In R.W. Pearcy et al (ed). Plant Physiological Ecology, Field Methods and Instrumentation, Hall, London.
11- Hunt, R. 1978. Plants growth analysis. E. Arnold, London.
12- Lizarazo, C., and F. Stoddard. 2012. Lentil-a promising new crop for Finland. P. 148. In Agricultural Sciences Meeting, 10-11 Jun. 2012. Finland Agricultural and Food Science. Viikki, Helsinki, Finland
13- Russelle, M. P. 1984. Growth analysis based on degree days. Crop Science. 24:28-32.
14- Wallace, D. M., and H. M. Munger. 1965. Studies of the physiological basis of yield differences. I. Growth analysis of six dry bean varieties. Crop Science. 5: 343-348.
15- Watson, D. J. 1947. Comparative physiological studies in the growth of field crops.Variation in net assimilation rate and leaf area between species and varieties, and within and between years. Annals of Botany, 11: 41-76.
16- Watson, D. J. 1952. The physiological basis of variation in yield. Advances in Agronomy, 4:101-145.
17- Zeide, B. 1993. Analysis of growth equations. Forest Science. 39:594-616.
CAPTCHA Image