Studying the Effect of Foliar Application of Methanol and Ethanol on Morphological and Biochemical Characteristics of Sweet Basil (Ocimum basilicum c.v. Keshkeni luvelou)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• M Moghaddam
• R Narimani
• Gh Rostami
• S Mojarab

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

10.22067/gsc.v16i2.57520

Abstract

Introduction
The side effects of chemical drugs has resulted in more attention of human to use medicinal plants and extract their ingredients for treated of many diseases. Iranian plateau have been introduced as an origin of many medicinal plants and according to the needs of pharmaceutical, food and cosmetic industries to medicinal plants as a raw materials, necessity of cultivation of medicinal plant species in the country is quite clear, because dependency to natural products and the indiscriminate exploitation of them will be extinction of this species. Basil (Ocimum basilicum) is a medicinal plant of the family of Lamiaceae, which it is very important in pharmaceutical industry, food and traditional medicine. Due to serious problems in the past decades resulting excessive application of chemical inputs and plant growth regulators to enhance agricultural production, nowadays, the need for new technologies to produce safe food and to protect environment has been of great interest to the international community. In this regard, the application of alcohols, especially ethanol and methanol solutions, to improve the performance of plants in the agricultural systems are important. Alcohols are the most important compounds in organic chemistry and they have wide frequency in the nature and are easily produced in the industry and chemical laboratories. In addition, use of foliar application of methanol and ethanol on the aerial parts of different plants propound as one of the newest strategies to increase growth and their yield. The objective of this experiment was evaluation of methanol and ethanol spraying effects on morphological and biochemical characteristics of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.).
Materials and Methods
This experiment was carried out as completely randomized design with three replications at the Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, in 2015. Plants were foliar treated with four levels of ethanol (0, 10, 20 and 40% v/v), methanol (0, 10, 20 and 40% v/v), the same mixture of methanol and ethanol (5, 15 and 25% v/v), and control (without spraying).
Results and Discussion
The results of variance analysis showed that the effect of foliar application had significant effect on measured indices, so that 40% methanol in the most of morphological characters is superior to the other levels. Alcohol treatments are effective to the growth and development of the vegetative organs of plants. Also, alcohol treatments can increase the carbohydrate accumulation and carbon dioxide concentration. Also, foliar application of methanol along with methanol that produces at leaves by pectin methyl esterase enzyme in cell wall development processes can increase cytokine in production and stimulation plant growth. In the biochemical traits, the most of antioxidant activity, phenol, carotenoids and chlorophyll b related to interaction of foliar application of methanol and ethanol 25%. Methanol increases turgor pressure, sugar content, cell swelling and helps to leaves development and increasing of chlorophyll and carotenoid content. Foliar application of methanol lead to increasing of FBPase enzyme activity such as enzymes that involve in control photosynthetic process. Ethanol converts to formaldehyde after penetrating to plant tissue and finally converts to carbon dioxide. Produced carbon dioxide increases internal concentration of that at leaf and causes to increase of photosynthetic efficiency. Also the most of total chlorophyll and chlorophyll a with 20% ethanol treatment and the most level of sugar were achieved by foliar application with 10% methanol.
Conclusions
Generally in this study it can be concluded that foliar application of methanol and ethanol as a carbon source and biostimulant can increase the biomass and yield of Basil.

Keywords

• Antioxidant activity
• Hydroalcoholic
• Sugar
• yield

20.1001.1.20081472.1397.16.2.6.9

---

References

1. Abanda, D., Musch, M., Tschiersch, J., and Schawb, M. 2006. Molecular interaction between methylobacterium extorquens and seedling: growth promotion, methanol consumption and localization of the methanol emission site. Journal of Experimental Botany 57 (15): 4025-4032.

2. Abbasian, A., Mirshekari, B., Safarzadeh Vishekaei, M. N., Rashidi, V., and Aminpanah, H. 2014. Growth, yield, and yield component changes in response to methanol application on rice (Oryza sativa cv. shiroudi). Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences 4 (2): 361-369.

3. Bagheri, H. R., Ladan Moghadam, A. R., and Afshari, H. 2014. The effects of foliar application of methanol on growth and secondary metabolites in lavender. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences 8 (2): 150-152.

4. Benson, A. A., and Nonomura, A. M. 1994. The path of carbon in photosynthesis: methanol inhibition of glycolic acid accumulation. Research Journal of Phytochemistry 34: 196.

5. Ehyaei, H. R., Parsa, M., Kafi, M., and Nasiri Mahalati, M. 2010. Effect of foliar application of methanol and irrigation regimes on yield and yield components of chickpea cultivars. Iranian Journal Pulses Research 1: 37-48. (in Persian with English abstract).

6. Fall, R., and Benson, A. A. 1996. Leaf methanol-The simplest natural product from plants. Journal of Trends Plant Science 1: 296-301.

7. Galbally, E., and Kirstine, W. 2002. The production of methanol by flowering plants and the global cycle of methanol. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry 43: 195-229.

8. Heins, R. 1980. Inhibition of ethylene synthesis and senescence in carnation by ethanol. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 105 (1): 141-144.

9. Hesketh, J. D., Orgen, W. L., Hageman, M. E., and Peters, D. B. 1981. Correlation among leaf CO2-exchange rates, areas and enzyme activities among soybean cultivars. Photosynthesis Research 2: 21-30.

10. Ivanova, E. G., Dornina, N. V., and Trotsenko, Y. A. 2001. Aerobic methylobacteria are capable of synthesizing auxins. Microbiology 70: 392-397.

11. Khosravi, E. 2011. Effect of methanol and ethanol on yield and quality of Melissa officinalis L. Master's thesis. Department of Horticulture Faculty of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University of Karaj, Iran. (in Persian).

12. Khosravi, M. T., Mehrafarin, A., Naghdi Badi H. A., Haji Aghaee, R., and Khosravi, E. 2011. Effect of methanol and ethanol on yield of Echinacea purpurea at Karaj-Iran. Journal of Herbal Drugs 2 (2): 121-128. (in Persian with English abstract).

13. Koocheki, A. R., and Khajeh Hosseini, M. 2008. Modern Agronomy. Jihad-e- Daneshgahi of Mashhad Press. (in Persian).

14. Li, Y., Gupta, J., and Siyumbano, A. K. 1995. Effect of methanol on soybean photosynthesis and chlorophyll. Journal of Plant Nutrition 18: 1875-1880.

15. Lionetti, V., Cervone, F., and Bellincampi, D. 2012. Methyl esterification of pectin plays a role during plant-pathogen interactions and affects plant resistance to diseases. Journal of Plant Physiology 169: 1623-1630.

16. Lutts, S., Kinet J. M., and Bouharmont, J. 1996. NaCl-induced senescence in leaves of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars differing in salinity resistance. Journal of Annals of Botany 78: 389-398.

17. Makhdum, M. I., Malik, M. N. A., Din, S. U., Ahmad, F., and Chaudhry, F. I. 2002. Physiology response of cotton to methanol foliar application. Journal of Research (Science) 13: 37-43.

18. Moon, J. H., and Terao, J. 1998. Antioxidant activity of caffeic acid and dihydrocaffeic acid in lard and human low density lipoprotein. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 46: 5062-5065.

19. Mousavi, J., and Bazrgar, A. B. 2014. Effect of foliar application of methanol and ethanol on yield components and essential oil content of dragonhead (Dracocephalum moldavica L.). Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences 4 (4): 381-386.

20. Muchow, R. C., Sinclair, T., and Rennetl, I. M. 1990. Temperature and solar radiation effects on potential maize yield across locations. Agronomy Journal 82: 238-343.

21. Nonomura, A. M., and Benson, A. 1992. The path of carbon in photosynthesis: improved crop yields with methanol. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89: 9794-9798.

22. Noor Husseini Niakan, S. A., Safarzadeh Vishkai, M. N., Aslani, A., and Vale Sheyda F. 2011. Effect of concentration methanol foliar application time on growth and yield of mungbean. Journal of Agricultural Research 3: 305-295.

23. Nourafcan, H., and Kalantari, Z. 2017. The effect of methanol and ethanol foliar application on peppermint morpho-physiological charactristics. Agroecology Journal 12 (4): 1-9. (in Persian with English abstract).

24. Omidbaigi, R. 2007. Production and processing of medicinal plants (Volume 1). Behnashr Publications. Tehran. (in Persian).

25. Qasim, A., Ashraff, M., and Anwar, F. 2010. Seed composition and seed oil antioxidant activity of maize under water stress. Journal of American Oil Chemistry Society 87: 1179-1187.

26. Rajala, A., Karkkainen, J., Peltonen, S., and Peltonen-Sainio, P. 1998. Foliar applications of alcohols failed to enhance growth and yield of C3 crop. Journal of Industrial Crops and Products 7: 129-137.

27. Ramirez, I. F., Dorta, V., Espinoza, E., Jimenez, A., and Mercado, H. 2006. Effects of foliar and root applications of methanol on the growth of Arabidopsis, tobacco and tomato plants. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 25: 30-44.

28. Rowe, R. N., Farr, D. J., and Richards, B. A. J. 1994. Effects of foliar and root applications of methanol or ethanol on the growth of tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 22: 335-337.

29. Sadasivam, S., and Manickam, A. 1992. In: Biochemical Methods for Agricultural Sciences. Wiley Eastern Ltd., New Delhi. Pp.184-185.

30. Safarzade Vishkaei, M. 2007. Effects of methanol on growth and yield of peanut. Ph.D. thesis. Sciences and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University Tehran, Iran. 232 pp. (in Persian).

31. Singleton, V. L., and Rossi, J. A. 1965. Colorimetry of total phenolic with phosphomolybdic and phosphotungstic acid reagent. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 16: 144-158.

32. Yavarpanah, Z., Alizadeh, M., and Seifi, E. 2015. Effects of foliar and root applications of hydro-alcoholic solutions on physiological and biochemical attributes and fruit yield and weight of strawberry. Journal of Plant Physiology and Breeding 5 (1): 47-54.

33. Zbiec, I. I., Karczmarczyk, S., and Koszanski, Z. 1999. Influence of methanol on some cultivated plants. Department of Plant Production and Irrigation. Agricultural University of Szczecin 73: 217-220.

34. Zbiec, I., Karczmarczyk, S., and Podsiadlo, C. 2003. Response of some cultivated plants to methanol as compared to supplemental irrigation. Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities (EJPAU) 6 (1): 1-7.