Effect of Irrigation and Nutrition Management on Yield and Yield Components of Quinoa in Birjand Conditions

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Birjand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Birjand, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Quinoa is a plant that has received worldwide attention due to its ability to grow in different stresses. The seed protein content of this plant is higher than seeds and its protein quality is better than seeds and legumes. It is rich in the amino acids lysine, globulin, which makes it suitable for patients with celiac disease. These issues have led the food and agriculture organization of the United Nations (FAO) to prioritize its development, especially in countries facing environmental tensions.
Materials and Methods
An experiment was conducted during the two cropping years of 2019-20 as split plot in a randomized complete block design with three replications in the academic center for education, culture, and research (ACECR), Birjand, IR Iran in 2019 and 2020. The main factor was irrigation regimes at three levels (100% of reference evapotranspiration (ET0) (control), 65% of reference evapotranspiration, and 30% of reference evapotranspiration; the secondary factor was fertilizer levels at six levels (control, manure, vermicompost, NPK, 50% manure+ 50% NPK and 50% vermicompost+ 50% NPK). Water requirement was calculated using the FAO method using class A evaporation pan using equations 1 and 2. Then, considering the efficiency of 90% for water distribution in the field, irrigation was performed. In this method, to calculate the amount of water required by the plant, first evaporation was obtained from the daily pan evaporation (Ep) of the meteorological department and then multiplied by the pan coefficient (Kpan). The obtained value was the ET0. In this study inflorescence number per square meter, number of seed per plant, 1000 seeds weight, Chlorophyll index, leaf relative water content, seed yield and harvest index were measured.
Results and Discussion
The results showed that irrigation treatment of 30% of the reference evapotranspiration (severe stress) had a significant effect on the measured traits in both cropping years. In this treatment, seed yield decreased 38.4% and 32.6% compared to the 100% reference evapotranspiration treatment (control) in the first and second years, respectively. Also, yield and yield components were higher in integrated feeding systems than chemical and organic systems. The highest seed yield with an average of 3040.1 kg.ha-1 was obtained from 50% vermicompost+ 50% NPK application. Based on the correlation results, 1000 seed weight was one of the most important components affecting on seed yield of quinoa. In both years, with increasing the intensity of stress from 100 to 35% of reference evapotranspiration, SPAD reading showed an increasing trend. The results of trait correlation showed that there is a positive and significant correlation between harvest index and 1000 seed weight with seed yield (r = 0.74) and (r = 0.83), respectively.
Conclusion
According to the results of this experiment, different irrigation regimes have different effects on quinoa growth. It is concluded that in quinoa, the dry matter decreases with increasing drought stress. In compared to optimal irrigation treatment (100% of evapotranspiration), moderate and severe stress were significant decreased the number of fertile lateral branches per plant, inflorescence number per m2, number of seeds per plant, 1000 seed weight, Chlorophyll index and seed yield treatments. Also, there was not a significant difference in seed yield between mild stress (65% of reference evapotranspiration) and control. The quinoa response to fertilizer application under enough irrigation was almost constant.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Ahmadinejad, R., Najafi, N., Aliasgharzad, N., and Oustan, S. 2013. Effects of organic and nitrogen fertilizers on water use efficiency, yield and the growth characteristics of Wheat (Triticum aestivum Alvand). Water and Soil Science 23 (2): 177-194. (in Persian with English abstract).
  2. Amujoyegbe, B. Y., Opbode, J. T., and Olayinka, A. Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizer on yield and chlorophyll content of Zea mays and Sorghum bicolor. Plant Science 46: 186-174. DOI: 10.5897/AJB2007.000-2278.
  3. Anonymous, 2019. Long-term rainfall statistics of Iran. Iran water resources management company. Online available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20180418074514/http://wrs.wrm.ir/m3/gozaresh.asp
  4. Azimzadeh, S., Nassiri Mahallati, M., and Koochaki, A. 2016. Study on replacement probability of organic with chemical fertilizers in Canola (Brassica napus) under two deficit and full Irrigation conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 14 (4): 587-598. (in Persian with English abstract).
  5. Barati, V., and Bijanzadeh, E. 2020. Grain yield and its components of titicale as affected by silicon foliar application, nitrogen fertilizer and water stress in reproductive phase. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 18 (4): 435-449. (in Persian with English abstract).
  6. Barjasteh, A., Nezami, A., Khazaie, H., and Zand, E. 2019. Effects of deficit irrigation and wild oat (Avena ludoviciana) density on yield and yield components of wheat. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 17 (1): 1-14. (in Persian with English abstract).
  7. Brussard, L., and Ferrera Cenato, R. 1997. Soil ecology in sustainable agricultural systems. New York: Lewis publishers, USA, P: 168.
  8. Cakmak, I. 2005. The role of potassium in alleviating detrimental effects of abiotic stresses in plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 168: 521-530.https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200420485.
  9. Dadrasan, M., Chaichi, M. R., Pourbabaee, A. A., Yazdani, D., and Keshavarz-Afshar, R. 2015. Deficit irrigation and biological fertilizer influence on yield and trigonelline production of fenugreek. Indian Crops Production 77: 156-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.08.040.
  10. Dehghanzadeh, H., and Adavi, Z. 2019. The effect of integrated management of organic and chemical fertilization on yield, oil, and essential oil of Black cumin (Nigella sativa) in different irrigation regimes. Journal of Crop Production 12 (1): 161-189. (in Persian with English abstract).
  11. Esfandiari sabzevar, T., Tatari, M., amd Farokhi, H. 2018. Antioxidative properties comparison of Chenopodium quinoa leaves and seeds ‎extract: in vitro study. Journal of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences 25 (3): 353-361. (in Persian with English abstract).
  12. Fageria, N. K., and Baligar, V. C. 2005. Enhancing nitrogen use efficiency in crop plant. Advance in Agronomy 88: 97-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(05)88004-6.
  13. Faizi Asl, W., and Valizadeh, G. R. 2003. The effect of time and nitrogen consumption on the yield of dry land wheat. Journal of Soil and Water Sciences 17 (1): 38-29. (in Persian with English abstract).
  14. Forouzandeh, M., Karimian, M. A., and Mohkami, Z. 2015. Effect of drought stress and different types of organic fertilizers on yield of cumin components in Sistan region. European Journal of Medicinal Plants 5 (1): 95-100.
  15. Ghasemi,, Siavoshi, K., Choukan, R., Khavasi, K., and Rahmani, A. 2011. Effect of biological phosphate fertilizer on grain yield and its components in corn 704 single cross (Zea mays L.) under water deficit conditions. Seed and Plant Production Journal 27-2 (2): 219-233. (in Persian with English abstract).
  16. Gholipour, S., Ebadi, A., and Permon, G. H. 2016. Components of different genotypes of grain of bread wheat. Crop Physiology Jouranl 8 (11): 111-128.
  17. Ghosh, P. K., Ajay, Bandyopadhyay, K. K., Manna, M. C., Mandal, K. G., Misra, A. K., and Hati, K. M. 2004. Comparative effectiveness of cattle manure, poultry manure, phosphocompost and fertilizer-NPK on three cropping systems in vertisols of semi-arid tropics. II. Dry matter yield, nodulation, chlorophyll content and enzyme activity. Bioresource Technology 95 (1): 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.011.
  18. Golparvar, A. R., Ghanadha, M. R., Zali, A. A., Ahmadi, A., and Harvan, E. M. 2006. Factor analysis of morphological and morphophysiological traits in bread wheat genotypes under drought and non-drought stress conditions. Journal of Pajouhesh and Sazandegi 72: 52-59. (in Persian with English abstract).
  19. González, J. A., Gallardo, M., Hilal, M., Rosa, M., and Prado, F. E. 2009. Physiological responses of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) to drought and waterlogging stresses: dry matter partitioning. Botanical Studies 50: 35-42.
  20. González-Teuber, M., Urzúa, A., Plaza, P., and Bascuñán-Godoy, L. 2018. Effects of root endophytic fungi on response of Chenopodium quinoa to drought stress. Plant Ecology 219 (3): 231-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-017-0791-1.
  21. Hariadi, Y., Marandon, K., Tian, Y., Jacobsen, S. E., and Shabala, S. 2011. Ionic and osmotic relations in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) plants grown at various salinity levels. Journal of Experimental Botany 62 (1): 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq257.
  22. Heidari, N. 2015. Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis, its parameters and relative water content of anise (Pimpinella anisum). Journal of Plant Research (Iranian Journal of Biology) 27 (5): 829-839. (in Persian with English abstract).
  23. Howell, T. A., Evett, S. R., Tolk, J. A., Copeland, K. S., Colaizzi, P. D., and Gowda, P. H. 2008. Evapotranspiration of corn and forage sorghum for silage. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 10 (1): 886-889.
  24. Ibrahim, M., Hassan, A. U., Arshad, M., and Tanveer, A. 2010. Variation in root growth and nutrient element concentration in wheat and rice: effect of rate and type of organic materials. Soil and Environment 29: 47-52.
  25. Ihuoma, S. O., and Madramootoo, C. A. 2017. Recent advances in crop water stress detection. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 141: 267-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.07.026.
  26. Ismail, M. R., Davies, W., and Awad, M. H. 2002. Leaf growth and stomatal sensitivity to ABA in droughted pepper plants. Science Horticulture 96: 313-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(02)00117-6.
  27. Izan, T., Javanmard, A., Shekari, F., and Abbasi, A. 2020. Evaluation of yield, yield components and some physiological traits of sunflower with integrative application of biological, chemical, and organic fertilizers under different irrigation levels. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 30 (3): 87-111. (in Persian with English abstract).
  28. Jalali, A. H., and Bahrani, M. J. 2014. Effect of crop reduce and nitrogen fertilizer on nitrogen use efficiency in Corn (Zea mays) production. Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh and Sazandegi) 102: 197-204. (in Persian with English abstract).
  29. Jamali, S., Goldani. M., and Zeynodin, S. 2020. Evaluation the effects of periodic water stress on yield and water productivity on Quinoa. Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage 13 (6): 1687-1697. (in Persian with English abstract).
  30. Jazayeri, S., Mousavinik, S., Bahreininejad, B., and Ghanbari, S. 2020. Effect of organic and chemical fertilizers on growth indices, yield and yield components of Guar in different plant densities. Horticultural Plants Nutrition 3 (1): 87-104. Doi: 22070/hpn.2020.5254.1080.
  31. Khaninejad, S., Khazaie, H., Nabati, J., and Kafi, M. 2016. Effect of three species of mycorrhiza inoculation on yield and some physiological properties of two potato cultivars under drought stress in controlled conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 14 (4): 558-574. (in Persian with English abstract).
  32. Khodabin, G., Tahmasebi-Sarvestani, Z., Shirani Rad, A., Modarres-Sanavy, S., and Bakhshande, E. 2020. The effect of withholding irrigation and foliar application of Zn and Mn on yield and eco-physiological Characteristics of Rapeseed (Brassica napus). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 18 (1): 85-100. (in Persian with English abstract).
  33. Kolenc, Z., Vodnik, D., Mandelc, S., Javornik, B., Kastelec, D., and Čerenak, A. 2016. Hop (Humulus lupulus ) response mechanisms in drought stress: Proteomic analysis with physiology. Plant physiology and biochemistry 105: 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.03.026.
  34. Koocheki, A., Hosseini, M., and Hashemi Dezfuli, A. 1995. Sustainable Agriculture Systems. Mashhad University Press.
  35. Lal, P., Chhipa, B. R., and Kumar, A. 1993. Salt affected soil and crop production: a modern synthesis. Agro Botanical Publishers, India, 375 pp.
  36. Mohammadi, S., Nahvi, M., and Mohadesi, A. 2015. The effect of irrigation interval on vegetative different stage on yield and yield component in rice line and varieties. Applied Field Crops Research 28 (107): 108-114. (in Persian with English abstract).
  37. Mohammadian, M., and Malakooti, M. J., 2002. Evaluation of the effect of two types of compost on physical and chemical properties of soil and main yield. Soil and Water Sciences 16 (2): 144-151. (in Persian with English abstract).
  38. Moradi, M., Soleymanifard, A., Naseri, R., Ghasemi, M., and Abromand, K. 2016. The changes of agronomic traits and harvest index of wheat under the effect of manure and plant growth promotion bacteria at different levels of nitrogen. Crop Physiology Journal 7 (28): 73-90. (in Persian with English abstract).
  39. Moradi, R. 2009. The effect of application of organic and biological fertilizers on yield, yield components and essential oil of Foeniculum vulgare (Fennel). Dissertation of MSc Master's degree, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (in Persian with English abstract).
  40. Nezami, A., Khazaeia, H. R., Boroumand Rezazadehb, Z., and Hossein, A. 2008. Effects of drought stress and defoliation on sunflower (Helianthus annuus) in controlled conditions. Desert (Biaban)12: 99-104.
  41. Ofosu-Anim, J., and Leitch, M. 2009. Relative efficacy of organic manures in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) production. Australian Journal of Crop Science 3: 13-19.
  42. Ojaghloo,, Farah, F., Hassanzadeh, S. A., and Javanshir, A. 2007. Effect of inoculation with azotobacter and barvar 2 phosphate biofertilizers on safflower yield. Journal of Agricultural Science 1 (3): 5-39. (in Persian with English abstract).
  43. Ommen, O. E., Donnelly, A., Vanhoutvin, S., Vanoijen, M., and Manderscheid, R. 1999. Chlorophyll content of spring wheat flag leaves grown under elevated CO2 concentration and other environmental stress within ESPACE-Wheat project. Europian Journal of Agronomy 10: 197-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(99)00011-8.
  44. Pazaki, A., Shirani Rad, A. H., Habibi, D., Madani, H., and Shamsi, K. 2007. Effect of drought stress on chlorophyll a and b content on two rapeseed cultivars. Plant and Ecosystem 10: 50-56. (in Persian with English abstract).
  45. Pedra, F., Polo, A. Ribero, A., and Domingues, H. 2006. Effect of municipal solid waste compost and sewage sludge on minerlization of soil organic matter. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 29: 1375-1382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.12.014.
  46. Rahbar Keykha, F., Khammari, E., Dahmardeh, M., and Forouzandeh, M. 2017. Effect of nano bio-fertilizer and chemical fertilizer application on quantitative and qualitative yield of Sesame cultivars. Journal of Crop Science Research in Arid Regions 1 (2): 177-190. (in Persian with English abstract).
  47. Rahimizadeh, M., Kashani, A., and Zare Faizabadi, A. 2010. The effect of preceding crop, nitrogen fertilizer and return of crop residue on growth and yield of wheat. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 8 (1): 98-110. (in Persian with English abstract).
  48. Reiahi, R. 2010. Drought stress management and alternative cultivation patterns to reduce water cnsumption in southern khorasan region. National Conference on Drought Stress Management and Water Shortage in Agriculture, Arsanjan. Iran.
  49. Rezvani Moghaddam, P., Asadi, Gh. A., Aghavani,Shajari, M., and Ranjbar, F. 2021. Yield and water use efficiency for Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa) as a medicinal plant in Mashhad condition. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 18 (4): 373-384. (in Persian with English abstract).
  50. Shackel, K. A., Matthews, M. A., and Morrison, J. C. 1987. Dynamic relation between expansion and cellular turgor in growing grape (Vitis vinifera) leaves. Plant Physiology 84: 1166-1171. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.84.4.1166.
  51. Shahmansouri, R. 2015. Reaction of quinoa cultivars to nitrogen levels. MSc Thesis. Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Iran. (in Persian with English abstract).
  52. Smart, R., and Bingham. G. E. 1974. Rapid estimates of relative water content. Plant Physiology 53: 258-260. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.53.2.258.
  53. Soleymani Fard, A., and Naseri, R. 2020. Evaluation of relationships between grain yield and agro-physiological traits of bread wheat genotypes under rainfed conditions. Environmental Stress in Crop Science 13 (3): 701-714. (in Persian with English abstract).
  54. Teimouri, F., and Bazrafshan, O. 2017. Analysis of temporal distribution of rainfall in Iran over the past four decades. Geography and Development Iranian Journal 15 (48): 171-188. (in Persian with English abstract).
  55. Weather base: Historical Weather for Birjand, Iran. https://www.weatherbase.com/weather/weather-summary.php3?s=90804&cityname=Birjand%2C+Khorasan-e+Jonubi%2C+Iran&units=.
  56. Yarnia, M., Safaie, P., Khorshidi-benam, M., and Farajzadeh, E. 2009. Effect of drought stress and potassium sulfate on yield and yield components of sunflower. New Finding in Agriculture 3 (3): 317-332. (in Persian with English abstract).
  57. Yeganehpour, F., Zehtab Salmasi, S., Shafaq Kalvanagh, J., and Ghasemi Golazani, K. 2017. Effect of drought stress chemical and biofertilizer and salicylic acid on grain yield and yield components of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum). Journal of Crop Production 9 (4): 37-55. (in Persian with English abstract).
  58. Yousefipor, M., Lack, S., and Payandeh, K. 2019. Evaluation of the Combined Effect of Biological and Chemical Phosphorous Fertilizers and Micronutrient on Seed and Protein Yield of Barley (Hordeum vulgare). Journal of Crop Ecophysiology 49 (1): 103-120. (in Persian with English abstract).
  59. Ziaei, S. M. M., Salimi, K., and Amiri, S. R. 2020. Investigation of quinoa cultivation (Chenopodium quinoa) under different irrigation intervals and foliar application in saravan region. Crop Physiology Journal 12 (45): 113-125. (in Persian with English abstract).
CAPTCHA Image
  • Receive Date: 15 March 2021
  • Revise Date: 21 November 2021
  • Accept Date: 27 November 2021
  • First Publish Date: 27 November 2021