Foliar Application of Potassium Fertilizer to Reduce the Effects of Salinity in Potato

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• H Molahoseini
• A. H Jalali

Isfahan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center

10.22067/gsc.v15i1.51406

Abstract

Introduction
The potato of commerce (Solanum tuberosum L.) is an annual dicot species. It is an autotetraploid with 4x=48 chromosomes. In Iran the consumption per capita of potato is over the 35 kg. Potato production is usually done without reducing yield in the irrigation water salinity 1-2 dS m-1, but 4.2 dS m-1 salinity reduces yield by 26 percent. 10, 25 and 50 percent yield reduction have been reported in soil electrical conductivity 2.5, 3.8 and 5.9 dS m-1, respectively . Between the ability of plant species to maintain potassium levels and their tolerance to salinity is positive correlation and on this basis nutritional irregularity due to increased salinity can be compensated by increasing of potassium fertilizer. In tolerant plant species, during times of increased salinity, selective absorption of potassium increased. The ability of plants to maintain a certain level of K/Na within the cell is essential for salt tolerance and sometimes of these ratios is used as indicators of salinity tolerance. Potato yield in response to salt stress, according to a variety of uses, can be reduced from 20 to 85 percent. Harmful effects of salinity in the beginning stages of tubers and tuber growth stage are important, therefore, tuber number and tuber size are two important components of yield which may reduce in the effect of salinity. Accelerate the aging process of the shoot, unwanted earliness, are of the reasons for the reduction in tuber size.

Materials and Methods
A field experiment was conducted in the agricultural and natural resources research center (31° 32´ N, 51° 51´ E), Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran. According to twenty years statistics, rainfall and temperature means for experiment location were 110 mm and 25 °C, respectively. The experiment was conducted as a factorial in a completely randomized block design with four replications. The treatments were three levels of foliar K application (control, K sulphate 10 ppm, and 2.5 ppm of potassium oxide), and the number of times foliar spray were included in one (start flowering), two (full emergence of flowers), and three (two weeks after full flowering stage) times. Potato (CV. Ramus) was planted in plots 1.5 × 6 m in February 24 and harvested in 24 May in the both years. Row and plant spacing’s were 75 and 20 cm, respectively. Irrigation (furrow) was applied when the soil moisture in the root zone declined to 60-65 percent of field capacity. To determine the irrigation time tensiometers placed at 15- and 30-cm depths responded to changes in soil water. To measure the tuber yield (after eliminating the edges), the whole tuber yield was measured on each plot. Tubers with size less than 35 mm were considered as non-salable tuber yield. An irrigation water productivity index based on the formula Tanner and Sinclair (1983) was calculated. Irrigation Water Productivity = Y/WC. In this formula, Y is the product of economic performance and WC is the consumed water. During the interval between the first and last spray, pressure chamber apparatus(Arimad-2 Japan) for measuring the youngest leaves water potential was used (hours 8-6 am). During the growing season, weeds were hand-weeding. The data were subjected to analysis of variance by SAS and means Fisher’s Protected LSD (5%) was used for mean separation.

Result and Discussions
The results of this study showed that salable yield with three times K sulfate spraying (Ps×3S), and potassium oxide treatments sprayed with two and three times (Po×2S and Po×3S) were significantly more than to other treatments, but did not find statistically significant differences among these three treatments. Tuber weight was the most important component that significantly affected by the interaction of potassium sprayed and its frequency. Three times foliar sprays of potassium sulfate (Ps×3S) and two and three times potassium oxide foliar application (Po×2S and Po×3S), showed 19, 17 and 21% increase in compared to the control treatment, respectively. Control, and even once treated by foliar potassium (Sulphate or potassium oxide) had lower harvest index values than the other treatments. The negative effect of irrigation with saline water on assimilate partitioning to the tuber is cause of the reduction of harvest index. Water use efficiency with foliar application of three times potassium sulfate or potassium oxide was 27% higher than the control treatment (4.5 kg m-3). The use of sufficient potassium in such a situation is not only necessary to maintain osmotic potency, the continuation of assimilates in phloem, and loading these vessels but also plays an important role in detoxification of sodium ions. In salinity stress, accelerated aging and earliness shoot unintentionally, are the reasons for the reduction in tuber size.

Conclusions
The results showed that foliar application of potassium, especially in two or three times (depending on the type of fertilizer application) can result in harmful effects of salinity and leads to an increase in tuber yield. In relation to foliar K application, some cases are necessary: First, due to the sensitivity of potato to fungal diseases, foliar application of fungicides and K fertilizers can be simultaneously tested in salt stress conditions. Second, the salinity considered for this study was 6.1 dS m-1. This amount of salinity to the potatoes is too much so it may be recommendable to spray less frequently at lower salinity levels.

Keywords

• Harvest index
• salinity
• Water use efficiency
• yield

20.1001.1.20081472.1396.15.1.16.0

---

References

1. Ahmad, M., Akhtar, J., Anvar-Ul-Haq, M., Mran, S., and Jacobsen, S. E. 2014. Soil and foliar application of potassium enhances fruit yield and quality of tomato under salinity. Turkish Journal of Biology 38: 208-218.

2. Ahmadvand, R., and Hassanabadi H. 2006. Evaluation of promising potato clones in terms of resistance levels the major virus diseases. Research Reports Seed and Plant Improvement Institute. 68 Pp. (in Persian).

3. Akram, M. S., Ashraf, M., and Akram N. A. 2009. Effectiveness of potassium sulfate in mitigation salt-induced adverse effects on different physio-biochemical attributes in sunflower. Flora 204: 471-483.

4. Allison, M. F., Fowler, J. H., and Allen E. J. 2001. Responses of potato to potassium fertilizers. Journal of Agriculture Science Cambridge 4: 407-426.

5. Azari, M., Baybordi, A., and Malakooti, M. J. 2004. The necessity of potassium fertilization on potato. Technical Bulletin 434, Sana Publications, Tehran, Iran. 18 Pp. (in Persian).

6. Benlloch, M., Ojeda M. A., Ramos J., and Rodriguez-Navarro, A. 1994. Salt sensitivity and low discrimination between potassium and sodium in bean plants. Plant and Soil. 166: 117-123.

7. Botella, M. A., Martinez V., Pardines J., and Cerda, A. 1997. Salinity induced potassium deficiency in maize plants. Journal of Plant Physiology, 150: 200-205.

8. El-Sawy, B. I., Radawan E. A., and Hassan N. A. 2000. Growth and yield of potato as affected by soil and foliar potassium application. The Journal of Agricultural Science, Mansoura University 25: 5843-5850.

9. Hermans, C., Hammond, J. P., White P. J., and Verbruggen N. 2006. How do plants respond to nutrient shortage by biomass allocation? Trends in Plant Science 11: 610-617.

10. Heuer, B., and Nadler, A. 1998. Physiological response of potato plants to soil salinity and water deficit. Plant Science 137: 43-51.

11. Jabeen, R., and Ahmad, R. 2009. Alleviation of adverse effects of salt stress by foliar application of sodium antagonistic essential minerals on cotton. Pakistan Journal of Botany 41: 2199-2208.

12. Kant, S., and Kafkafi, U. 2002. Potassium and abiotic stresses in plants. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Faculty of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Quality Sciences, Rehovot, Israel. http://www. ipipotash.org.

13. Kaya, C., Kirnak, H. and Higgs, D. 2001. Enhancement of growth and normal growth parameters by foliar application of potassium and phosphorus in tomato cultivars grown at high (NaCl) salinity. Journal of Plant Nutrition 24: 357-367.

14. Kotuby-Amacher, J., Koenig, R., and Kitchen, B. 1997. Salinity and plant tolerance. Utah Univ. Exten. Logan Utah, 8pp.

15. Levy, D. 1992. The response of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) to salinity: plant growth and tuber yields in the arid desert of Israel. Annals of Applied Biology 120: 547-555.

16. Marschner, P. 2012. Marschners mineral nutrition of higher plants. London Elsevier. 231 Pp.

17. Mullins, G. L., and Burmester, C. H. 1995. Response of cotton to the source of foliar potassium. In: Richer, D.A. (ed), Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., San Antonio, TX. National Cotton Council of America, Memphis, pp. 1313-1315.

18. Nasseri, A., and Bahramloo, R. 2009. Potato cultivar Marfona yield and water use efficiency responses to early season water stress. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 11: 201-204.

19. Patrick, J. W., Zhang, W. H., Tyerman, S. D., Offler, C. E., and Walker, N. A. 2001. Role of membrane transport in phloem translocation of assimilates and water. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 28: 695-707.

20. Perrenoud, S. 1993. Fertilizing for High Yield Potato. IPI Bulletin8. 2nd Edition. International Potash Institute, Basel, Switzerland.

21. Pettigrew, W. T. 2008. Potassium influences on yield and quality production for maize, wheat, soybean and cotton. Physiol. Plantarum 133: 670-681.

22. Raman, S. N., Desai, D., Solanaki, J. B. and Bhatt, S. M. 1986. The Na/K ratio as index of salt stress in rice culture. International Rice Research Newsletter 11: 1-30.

23. Ramani, S., and Apte, S. K. 1997. Transient expression of multiple genes in salinity-stressed young seedlings of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 233: 663-667.

24. Reisi, F., and Khajehpour, M. R. 1992. The effects of N, P, and K fertilizers on the growth and yield of Kozima potato. Iranian Journal of Agriculture Science 23: 35-45. (in Persian).

25. SAS Institute. 2010. SAS user’s guide. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.

26. Satyanarayana, V., and Arora, P. N. 1985. Effect of nitrogen and potassium on yield and yield attributes of potato (Var. Kufri Bahar). Indian Journal of Agronomy 30: 292-295

27. Shannon, M. 1997. Adaptation of plants to salinity. Advances in Agronomy 60: 75-120.

28. Tanner, C. B., and Sinclair, T. R. 1983. Efficient water use in crop production: Research or re-research? P.1-27.In H.M. Taylor et al. (ed.) Limitations to efficient water use in crop production. American Statistical Association, Madison, WI.

29. Trehan, S. P., and Sharma, R. C. 2002. Potassium uptake efficiency of young plants of three potato cultivars as related to root and shoot parameters. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 33: 13-18.

30. Van Hoorn, J. W., Katerji, N., Hamdy, A., and Mastrorilli, M. 1993. Effect of saline water on soil salinity and on water, stress, growth and yield of wheat and potatoes. Agriculture and Water Management 23: 247-265.

31. Vreugdenhil, D., Bradshaw, J., Gebhardt, C., Govers, F., Mackerron, K. L. L., Taylor, M. A., and Ross, H. A. 2007. Potato biology and biotechnology. Advances and perspectives. First edition Elsevier Ltd. 823Pp.

32. Weimberg, R., Lerner, H. R. and Poljakoff-Mayber, A. 1982. A relationship between potassium and proline accumulation in salt-stressed Sorghum bicolor. Physiologia Plantarum 55: 5-10.

33. Zaki, N. M., Hassanein, M. S., Amal, G., Ebtesam, A., El-Housini, M., and Tawfik, M. 2014. Foliar application of potassium to mitigate the adverse impact of salinity on some sugar beet varieties. 2: Effect on Yield and Quality. Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research 3 (3): 448-460.

34. Zhu, J. K. 2003. Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 6: 441-445.