Assessment of Forage Yield and Quality of Corn (Zea mays) KSC 260 Cultivar under Different Integrate Management of Soil Amendment and Plant Residue

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• H. A Pooresmail
• M Dahmardeh
• A Ghanbari

University of Zabol

10.22067/gsc.v16i4.72820

Abstract

Introduction
The necessity of using sustainable agricultural systems, especially in agricultural fields, is more important than the development of arable land. Sustainable agriculture is based on the efficient management of the elements of production to improve soil quality and one of the main problems in sustainable agriculture is the lack of organic matter and its consequences. One of the possible, inexpensive and feasible ways to increase organic matter in agricultural lands is to return crop residues to the soil. In sustainable agriculture, the use of compost and vermicompost increases the microbial activity of the soil, which increases the nutrient requirements of the plant, especially the consumed elements, which leads to increased crop yields. In order to evaluate integrated fertilizer management and harvest time on the quality and quantity of corn forage, this experiment was conducted in the research farm of Zabol University in 2016-17 crop year.
Materials and Methods
An experiment was conducted as factorial based on a randomized complete block design with three replications in the research farm of Zabol University during 2016-17 cropping year. The first factor included 10 fertilization levels: (without fertilization, 30% wheat residue, 60% wheat residues, 90% wheat residues, 30% vermicompost, 60% vermicompost, 100% vermicompost, 10% vermicompost + 90% wheat residues, 40% of vermicompost + 60% of wheat residues and 70% vermicompost + 30% of wheat residues) and the second factor of harvesting time were at two levels: (harvest in milky and dough stages). The studied traits included leaf dry weight, stem dry weight, dry matter digestibility, water-soluble carbon hydrates, crude protein and protein yield, crude fiber, insoluble fiber in acid detergent, insoluble fibers in neutral detergent and ash.
Results and Discussion
The results of analysis of variance showed that the effect of interaction between harvesting stage and combined fertilizer management systems on leaf dry weight, stem dry weight, dry matter digestibility, the percentage of water-soluble hydrocarbons and insoluble fiber in acid detergent was significant. As the plant mature and the stems grow, the ratio of leaf to stem decreases in forage. The highest leaf dry weight (146 g) and stem dry weight (185.33 g) were obtained in milk militias and in the application of 70% vermicompost and 30% of wheat residues. Mean comparisons showed that the highest digestibility of dry matter (69.72%), the highest percentage of water-soluble carbohydrate (21.17%) was observed in dough stage with the application of 60% of wheat residues. The highest non-soluble fiber in acid detergent (34.85 g / kg dry matter) was obtained in the milky stage of grain and in the application of 70% vermicompost and 30% of the wheat residues. Insoluble fiber in acid detergent was the most important determinant of forage quality. The results of the analysis of variance showed that the effect of harvesting stage on the percentage of crude protein and ash content was very significant; the effect of harvesting stage and the effect of combined fertilizer management systems on the percentage of CF was significant; and the simple effect of combined fertilizer management on the non-soluble fiber (CF) in neutral detergent was meaningful. Comparison of means showed that the highest percentage of crude protein (9.32%) was observed in the milky stage; the highest percentage of crude fiber in the grain dough stage (35.45%) and in the application of 70% vermicompost + 30% wheat residues (36.85%); The most NDF (52.58 g / kg dry matter) in terms of application of 70% vermicompost + 30% of wheat residues; and the highest percentage of Ash (7.21%) in milky stage was obtained. The optimal quality is obtained when the plant has a digestibility of dry matter, crude protein, WSC, and more ash content. In general, using 60% and 100% vermicompost ratios and 60% of wheat residues improved the quality of forage at harvest time from the milky stage. The results of this study confirmed the importance of soil organic matter in improving forage quality.
Conclusions
The results of this study confirmed the importance of soil organic matter in improving forage quality. According to the results of this study, the combined application of vermicompost with wheat residues has improved the quantitative and qualitative traits studied in corn. So that application of 70% vermicompost plus 30% wheat residues increased 2% protein percentage compared to control. Therefore, the application of the combined fertilizer system in the long term increases the content of nitrogen and organic carbon in soil. In general, 70% and 100% vermicompost ratios and 60% of wheat residues improved the quality of forage at harvest time from milking stage. The growth stage at harvest time, the most important determinant of forage quality, is a definite species. Forage quality decreases with the advancement of growth stages.

Keywords

• Crude and yield protein
• Harvesting time
• Plant remnants
• Vermicompost

20.1001.1.20081472.1397.16.4.12.9

---

References

1. Agele, S. O. 2006. Weather and seasonal effects on growth, seed yield and soluble carbohydrate concentrations in selected maize cultivars in the humid areas of Nigeria. African Journal of Agricultural Research 101-110.

2. Alikani, H., and Savabeghi, G. R. 2006. Vermicomposting for sustainable agriculture, Jihad Daneshgahi Tehran Press. (in Persian).

3. Almodares, A., Jafarinia, M., and Hadi, M. R. 2009. The effect of nitrogen fertilizer on chemical compositions in corn and sweet sorghum. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences 6: 441-446.

4. Aracon, N., Edwards, C. A., Bierman, P., Welch, C., and Metger, D. 2004. Influence of vermicomposts on field strawberries. I. effects on growth and yields. Bioresearch Technology 93:145-153.

5. Arzani, H. 2009. The quality of forage and the daily requirement of grazing livestock from pasture. Tehran University Press. 354 p. (in Persian).

6. Bending, G. D., Turner, M. K., and Jones, J. E. 2002. Interactions between crop residue and soil organic matter quality and the functional diversity of soil microbial communities. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 34: 1073-1082.

7. Bozorgmehr, J., and Nastaran nasrabadi, H. 2014. Effect of planting date and cultivar on yield and quality of forage corn. Applied Field Crop Research 27 (104): 160-164. (in Persian with English abstract).

8. Chanda, G. K., Bhunia, G., and Chakraborty, S. K. 2011. The effect of vermicompost and other fertilizers on cultivation of tomato plants. Journal Horticulture and Forestry 3 (2): 42-45.

9. Chaudhary, H. K., Kaila, V., and Rather, S. A., 2014. Maize. In: Pratap, A., Kumar, J., (eds), Alien Gene Transfer in Crop Plants: Achievements and Impacts, Springer, New York, USA.

10. Coors, J. G., Albercht, K. A., and Bures, E. J. 1997. Ear-Fill effects on yield and quality of silage corn. Crop Science 37: 243-247.

11. Correa, C. E. S., Pereira, M. N., Oliveira, S. G., and Ramos, M. H. 2003. Performance of Holstein cows fed sugarcane or corn silages of different grain textures. Scientia Agricola 60 (4): 621-629.

12. Cox, W. J., Kalonge, S., Cherney, D. J. R., and Reid, W. S. 1993. Growth, yield, and quality of forage maize under different nitrogen management practices. Agronomy Journal 85: 341-347.

13. Danesh Mesgaran, M., Heravi Mousavi, A., and Fathi, M. H. 2004. Feeding the dairy cow. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Press. 559 p. (in Persian).

14. Dehghan'poor, Z. 2010. Early grain corn Fajr (Single Cross 260). Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Research, Training, and Promotion Institute of Seed and Plant Improvement Research. 8p. (in Persian).

15. Di Marko, O. N., Aello, M. S., Nomdedeu, M., and Houtte, S. V. 2002. Effect of maize crop maturity on silage chemical composition and digestibility (in vivo, in situ and in vitro). Animal Feed Science and Technology 99: 37- 43.

16. Eghball, B. 2002. Soil properties influenced by phosphorous and nitrogen based manure and compost applications. Agronomy Journal 94: 128-135.

17. Ehteshami S. M. R., Jan zamin, A., Ramazani, M., Khavazi, K., and Zand, B. 2013. The Effect of combined Phosphorus Fertilizer Management on Quantitative and Qualitative Yield of Two Corn Varieties in Varamin. Agricultural Crop Management 15 (1): 95-110. (in Persian with English abstract).

18. Emam, Y., and Niknejad, M. 2004. An introduction to the physiology of crop yield. Shiraz University Press. 571p. (in Persian).

19. Eskandari, H., and Ghanbari. A. 2009. Intercropping of maize (Zea mays) and cowpea (Vigna sinensis) as wholecrop forage: Effect of different planting pattern on total dry matter production and maize forage quality. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 37 (2): 152-155.

20. FAOSTAT. 2014. Statistical database of the food and agriculture organization of the united nations. FAO, Rome.

21. Fischer, R. A., Santiveri, F., and Vidal, I. R. 2002. Crop rotation, tillage and crop residue management for wheat and maize in the sub- humid tropical highlands. ΙΙ Maize and system performance. Field Crops Research 79: 123-137.

22. Forouzmand, M. A., Ghorbani, G. R., and Alikhani, M. 2005. Influence of Hybrid and Maturity on the Nutritional Value of Corn Silage for Lactating Dairy Cows 1: Intake, Milk Production and Component Yield. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 4 (6): 435-441.

23. Ghanbari, A. 2000. Intercropped wheat (Triticum aestivum) and bean (Vicia faba) as a low–input forage. PhD Thesis. Wye College University of London.

24. Ghanbari, A., and Lee, H. C. 2002. Intercropped field beans (Vicia faba) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) for whole crop forage: Effect of nitrogen on forage yield and quality. Journal of Agriculture Science, Cambridge 138: 311-314.

25. Ghanbari, A., Ahmadiyan, A., Mir, B., and Razmjoo, A. 2010. Effect of harvesting time on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of corn forage. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology 4 (15): 41-54. (in Persian with English abstract).

26. Ghanbari, A., Ismailian, Y., and Babaiean, B. 2013. Effect of animal and chemical fertilizers on forage yield, grain and concentration of some nutrients in barley corn. Journal of Plant Ecophysiology of Iran 31 (3): 23-36. (in Persian with English abstract).

27. Govaerts, B., Mezzalama, M., Unno, Y., Sayre, K., Luna-Guido, M., Vanherck, K., Dendooven, L., and Deckers, J. 2007. Influence of tillage, residue management, and crop rotation on soil microbial biomass and catabolic diversity. Applied Soil Ecology 37: 18-30.

28. Gul, I., Demirel, R., Kilicalp, N., Sumerli, M., and Kilic, H. 2008. Effect of crop maturity stages on yield, Silage Chemical Composition and In vivo Digestibilities of the maize, sorghum and sorghum sudangrass hybridsg in semi-arid conditions. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 8: 1021-1028.

29. Hatew, B., Bannink, A., Van Lear, H., Degonge, L. H., and Dijkstra, J. 2016. Increasing harvest maturity of whole corn silage reduces methane emission lectating dairy cows. Journal of dairy Science 99 (1): 354-368.

30. Hirzell, J., and Walter, I. 2008. Availability of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium from poultry litter and conventional fertilizers in a volcanic soil cultivated with silage corn. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 68: 264-273.

31. Ibrahim ghoochi, Z., Mohsen abadi, Gh. R., Ehteshami, S. M. R., and Forghani, A. 2013. Combined application of chemical, biological and livestock fertilizers on growth characteristics of forage corn in Rasht, Cereal Research 3 (2): 143-154. (in Persian with English abstract).

32. Johnson, L. J., Harrison, H., Davidson, D., Mahanna, W. C., Shinners, K., and Linker, D. 2001. Corn silage management Effect of maturity, Inoculation and mechanical processing on pack Density and Aerobic stability. Journal Dairy Science 85: 434-444.

33. Juan, L., Bing-qing, Z., Xiu-ying, L., Rui-bo, J., and Hwat Big, S. 2008. Effect of long- term combined application of organic and mineral fertilizers on microbial biomass, soil enzyme activities and soil fertility. Agricultural Sciences in China 7 (3): 336- 343.

34. Karami, A., and Niazi, J. 2005. Effect of sources and quantities of organic matter on soil properties and grain corn function. The 9th Iranian Soil Science Congress 75-78. (in Persian).

35. Karimi, H. 2007. Farming and breeding of forage plants. Tehran University Press. 428 p. (in Persian).

36. Kassam, A. H., Friedrich, T., Derpsch, R., and Kienzle, J. 2014.Worldwide adoption of conservation agriculture. 6th World Congress on Conservation Agriculture: 22-27 June 2014, Winnipeg, Canada.

37. Koochaki, A., Hosseini, M., and Hashemi Dezfouli, A. 2007. Sustainable agriculture (translation and editing). Jahad Daneshgahi Mashhad Press. 163 p. (in Persian).

38. Lazcano, C., Revilla, P., Anamalwar, R., and Dominguez, J. 2011. Yield and fruit quality of four sweet corn hybrids (Zea mays) under conventional and integrated fertilization with vermicompost. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 91 (7): 1244-1253.

39. Lithourgidis, A. S., Vasilakoglou, I. B., Ohima, K. V., Dordas, C. A., and YIakoulaki, M. D. 2006. Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crops Research 99: 106-113.

40. Maghsoodi, A., Ghalvand, A., and Aghaalakhani, M. 2014. Effect of nitrogen and biodiversity management strategies on morphological traits, grain yield and quality traits of single cross 704 corn. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 12 (2): 272-282. (in Persian with English abstract).

41. Majidiyan, M., Khosh chereh Ziba, A., and Mansoorifar, S. 2016. Yield and Quality of Two Sorghum Cultivars affected by Domestic and Nitrogen Fertilizers. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 26 (1): 132-143. (in Persian with English abstract).

42. Martin, R., Voldengh, H., and Smith, O. 1990. Intercropping corn soybean for silage in a cool temperate region. Yield, protein and economic effects. Field crops Research 23 (3-4): 295-310.

43. McDonald, P. R., Edwards, A., and Greenhalgh, J. F. D. 1990. Animal Nutrition. 4th edition, John Willey and Sons, Inc, New York.

44. McDonald, P., Henderson, A. R., and Heron, S. J. E. 1991. The Biochemistry of Silage. 2nd Ed. Chalcombe publications; Canterbury, UK. 340p.

45. Miller, P., Mcconkey, B., and Clayton, G. 2002. Pulse crop adaptation in the northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal 94: 261-272.

46. Mirlohi, A., Bozorgvar, N., and Basiri, M. 2000. Effect of nitrogen rate on growth, forage yield and silage quality of three sorghum hybrids. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 4 (2): 105-116. (in Persian with English abstract).

47. Mohajeri, A., Haj seyed hadi, M. R., and Shahsavar, A. M. 2015. Evaluation of Quantitative and Qualitative Yield of KSC704 and KSC260 Forage Forms in Common Agricultural, Combined and Organic Farming Systems, New Finding in Agriculture 9 (4): 313-326. (in Persian with English abstract).

48. Mohammadabadi, A., Mohammad, A. N., Asif, T., and Azhar, H. 2002. Effect of different levels of nitrogen and harvesting times on the growth, yield and quality of sorghum fodder. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 1 (4): 304-307.

49. Mousavi, M. A. 1995. Determination of Chemical Composition and Raw Energy of Livestock and Poultry Food in Kermanshah Province. Master's Thesis of Agriculture. University of Tehran. 134 p. (in Persian with English abstract).

50. Najafi, N. A., Mostafaei, M., Dabbagh, A., and Ostan, Sh. 2013. Effect of intercropping and livestock manure on growth, yield and protein concentration of corn, bean and goat. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 23 (1): 99-115. (in Persian with English abstract).

51. National Research Council (NRC). 1978. Nutrient requirements of domestic animals. No.6. Nutrient Requirements of horses. National Academic Science, Natural Resource Council, Washington, D. C. 180 p.

52. Nazari, Sh., Zaefariyan, F., Farahmandfar, A., Zand, A., and Azimi Soran, S. 2014. Effect of different harvesting times on yield and quality of corn forage under intercropping conditions with leguminous plants. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 2 (44): 237-245. (in Persian with English abstract).

53. Power, J. F., Doran, J. W., and Koerner, P. T. 1991. Hairy vetch as a winter cover crop for dryland corn production. Journal of Production Agriculture 4: 62-67.

54. Ramroudi, M., Mazaheri, D., Majnon Hosseini, N., Hossein Zadeh, A., and Hosseini, M. 2005. The effect of cover crops, tillage systems and nitrogen fertilizer on yield of forage sorghum (Sorgum bicolor L.). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 41 (4): 763-769. (in Persian with English abstract).

55. Rezvani Moghaddam, P., and Nassiri Mahallati, M. 2004. Determination of digestibility of dry matter and protein percentage of forage for three varieties of forage sorghum at different harvesting times, Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science 35 (4): 787-796. (in Persian with English abstract).

56. Roghanian, S. 2005. Effect of dry matter and compost on some chemical properties of soil and response of corn. Journal of Crops 1: 531-556. (in Persian with English abstract).

57. Safa'i, S., Asghari, H., Firouz'abadi, M., and Abbas'dokht, H. 2012. Effect of compost and nitrogen fertilizer on leaf area index and some characteristics of safflower. 12th Iranian Congress of Agronomy and Plant Breeding 1-4. (in Persian).

58. Samuel, R., Simon, F., and Bababbo, P. 2015. Yield performance of sweet corn (Zea mays) Using vermicompost as a component of balanced fertilization strategy. International journal of Chemical Environmental and Biological Science 3 (3): 224-227.

59. Sarepoua, E., Tangwongchai, R., Suriharn, B., and Lertrat, K. 2015. Influence of variety and harvest maturity on phytochemical content in corn silk. Food Chemistry 169 (15): 424-429.

60. Sedighiniya, H. 2003. Effect of harvesting time on yield and quality of dill sorghum silage, Master's thesis in agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Zabol University. (in Persian with English abstract).

61. Selahattin, P. T. A., and Musa, Y. 2008. Effect of Pollination Levels on Yield and Quality of Maize Grown for Silage. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 32: 41-48.

62. Sharma, A. K. 2003. Biofertilizer for sustainable agriculture. Agrobios Publication, India.

63. Tartoura, A. H. 2010. Alleviation of oxidative-stress induced by drought through application of compost in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants. American-Eurasian Journal Agriculture Environment Science 9 (2): 208-216.

64. Varmaghani, S. 2005. Determination of Chemical Composition and Raw Material for Rangeland Forage in Ilam Province. Quarterly Pajouhesh-va-Sazandegi (Natural Resources) 74: 79-86. (in Persian with English abstract).

65. Von Braun, J., Byerlee, D., Chartres, C., Lumpkin, T., Olembo, N., and Waage, J. J. 2010. A draft strategy and results framework for the CGIAR. World Bank, CGIAR, Washington DC, USA.

66. Ward, J. D., Redfearn, D. D., McCormick, M. E., and Cuomo, G. J. 2001. Chemical composition, ensiling characteristics, and apparent digestibility of summer annual forage in a subtropical double cropping system with annual ryegrass. Journal of Dairy Science 84: 177-182.

67. Yuste, C. J., Baldocchi, D. D., Gershenson, A., Goldestein, A., Mission, L., and Wong, S. 2007. Microbial soil respiration and its dependency on carbon inputs, soil temperature and moisture. Global Change Biology 13: 1-18.