Assessment of Paclobutrazol’s Time and Concentration of Foliar Application on Production and Germination of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Mini-tube

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• B Saadatian
• M Kafi
• M Bannayan Aval
• J Nabati

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

10.22067/gsc.v15i4.53270

Abstract

Introduction
Health and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) seeds are important in the potato seed production technology. Moreover, the basic seed materials must be free of pathogens. Therefore tissue culture techniques are used at this stage in the laboratory to produce disease free seeds. Mini-tubers can be produced after acclimatization from plantlets as tissue culture which are planted at high densities in the greenhouse in beds or containers using different substrate mixtures, or even in hydroponic culture. Foliar application of growth regulators is a way to increase potato mini-tuber production. Growth regulators influence on potato mini-tuber dormancy. Triazoles, a family which Paclobutrazol belongs to them, have both fungitoxic and plant growth regulatory effects. In addition, they can also protect plants against various stresses. Therefore, the triazoles have been characterized as plant multi-protestants. Paclobutrazol changes the relationship between source and sink and by this way, affects plant production. Also, it can inhibit giberellic acid biosynthesis. Some morphological changes observed in paclobutrazol-treated plants include the inhibition of plant growth, decreased inter-nodal elongation and increased root to shoot ratios. Time of paclobutrazol foliar application is an important factor which changes plant characters (Lim et al., 2004). This study implemented to evaluate foliar application of paclobutrazol concentrations at different time on production and mini-tuber dormancy.
Materials and Methods
The factorial experiment based on randomized complete block design with four replications was conducted at the faculty of agriculture’s research greenhouse, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran, in 2013. Plantlets of Agria cv. produced from nodal tissue culture in Murashinge and Skoog (MS) medium. After 25 days, plantlets of free disease and uniform exported to plastic pots with 12 cm diameter and 30 cm height. Perlite, cocopite and sand with 3:3:4 ratios, formed the substrate. Potato plantlets were fed with corrected Hoagland solution. Treatments were foliar application of paclobutrazol at two growth stages (stolen initiation and tuber initiation) and six concentrations (control, 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 mg l-1). Foliar application of mentioned concentrations implemented in the final hours of day. After 95 days from transplanting, number of mini-tuber in plant, mini-tuber length, mini-tuber diameter and mean of mini-tuber weight were measured. Then, mini-tubers saved to fridge with 8±2ºC and 10% relative humidity. Two months later, mini-tuber’s germination was measured. Finally, time of achievement to 5, 10, 50, 90 and 95 germination percentage was measured with Germin program. Beside that, rate of germination was calculated with equation 1:
(1)
R50 and D50: rate of germination (1/h) and time of achievement to 50% germination, respectively.
Analysis of variance and correlation between trials was done with SAS 9.1 Software. Means comparison measured with least significant difference test (LSD) at 5% probability level.
Results and Discussion
The main effects and interactions of paclobutrazol foliar application and growth stages, on number of mini-tuber in plant, mini-tuber length, mini-tuber diameter, mean of mini-tuber weight and time of achievement to 5, 10, 50, 90 and 95 germination percentage trials were significant. But interaction between foliar application and growth stages was not significant at germination rate trial. The effect of foliar application on maintained trials in tuber initiation stage was lower than stolen initiation. Increase in paclobutrazol concentration increased mini-tuber dormancy and reduced germination rate. Paclobutrazol application in tuber initiation stage had more inhibition on mini-tuber germination. With increase in paclobotrazol concentration, time of achievement to 5, 10, 50, 90 and 95% germination were 11, 13, 17, 19 and 17% in comparison between foliar application growth stages (tuber initiation compared to stolen initiation).Significant negative correlation obtained between number of mini-tuber in plant, mini-tuber length, mini-tuber diameter, mean of mini-tuber weight trials with time of achievement to 5, 10, 50, 90 and 95 germination percentage..
Conclusions
Application of 20 mg l-1 paclobutrazol at stolen initiation, produced highest number of mini-tuber. But, maximum amount of mini-tuber length, mini-tuber diameter and mean of mini-tuber weight obtained in control treatment. Overall, in most cases paclobutrazol application had negative effect on production and germination of mini-tuber potatoes.

Keywords

• Agria cv
• Growth regulator
• Tuber dormancy
• Tuber size

20.1001.1.20081472.1396.15.4.6.6

---

References

1. Alexopoulos, A. A., Akoumianakis, K. A., Vemmos, S. N., and Passam, H. C. 2007. The effect of postharvest application of gibberellic acid and benzyl adenine on the duration of dormancy of potatoes produced by plants grown from TPS. Postharvest Biology and Technology 46: 54-62.

2. Balamani, V., and Poovaiah, B. W. 1985. Retardation of shoot growth and promotion of tuber growth of potato plants by paclobutrazol. American Potato Journal 62: 333-338.

3. Bandara, P. M. S., and Tanino, K. K. 1995. Paclobutrazol enhances minituber production in norland potatoes. Journal of Plant Growth Regulator 14: 151-155.

4. Bandara, M. S., Tanino K. K., and Waterer, D. R. 1998. Effect of pot size and timing of plant growth regulator treatments on growth and tuber yield in greenhouse-grown norland and russet burbank potatoes. Journal of Plant Growth Regulator 17: 75-79.

5. Claassens, M. M. J., and Vreugdenhil, D. 2000. Is dormancy breaking of potato tubers the reverse of tuber initiation?. Potato Research 43: 347-369.

6. Farran, I., and Mingo-Castel, A. M. 2006. Potato minituber production using aerophonics: effect of plant density and harvesting intervals. American Journal Potato Research 83: 47-53.

7. Haghighi, M., and Pessarakli, M. 2013. Influence of silicon and nano-silicon on salinity tolerance of cherry tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) at early growth stage. Scientia Horticulture 161: 111-117.

8. Harvey, B. M. R., Crothers, S. H., Evans, N. E., and Selby, C. 1991. The use of growth retardants to improve microtuber formation by potato (Solanurn tuberosurn). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture 27: 59-64.

9. Kanwal, A., Ali, A., and Shoaib, K. 2006. In Vitro Microtuberization of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Cultivar Kuroda- A New Variety in Pakistan. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 8 (3): 337-340.

10. Lim, T. H., Cheol, S. Y., Choi, S. P., and Dhital, S. 2004. Application of giberelic acid and paclobutrazol for efficient production of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) minitubers and their dormancy breaking under soilless culture system. Journal of Korea Society Horticulture Science 45 (4): 189-193.

11. Maleki Lajayer, H., Esmaielpour, B., and Chamani, E. 2011. Hinokitiol and activated charcoal influence the microtuberization and growth of potato (solanum tuberasum cv. Agria) plantlets in vitro. Australian Journal of Crop Science 5 (11): 1481-1485.

12. Ozturk, G., and Yildirim, Z. 2010. A Comparison of field performances of minitubers and micro tubers used in seed potato production. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 15 (2): 141-147.

13. Rashed Mohassel, M. H., Aliverdi, A., and Rahimi, S. 2011. Optimizing dosage of sethoxydim and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl with adjuvants to control wild oat. Industrial Crops and Products 34: 1583-1587.

14. Ritter, E., Angulo, B., Riga, P., Herran, C., Rellosoand J., and San Jose, M. 2001. Comparison of hydroponic and aeroponic cultivation systems for the production of potato minitubers. Potato Research 44: 127-135.

15. Saadatian, B., and Kafi, M. 2015. Study of nutritional role of silicon nano-particles on physiological characteristics of minituber potato production. Journal of Plant Production Research 22: 173-189. (in Persian with English abstract).

16. Simko, I. 1993. Effects of kinetin, paclobutrazol and their interactions on the microtuberization of potato stem segments cultured in vitro in the light. Plant Growth Regulator 12: 23-27.

17. Simko, I. 1994. Effects of paclobutrazol on in vitro formation of potato micro-tubers and their sprouting after storage. Biology of Plant 36 (1): 15-20.

18. Soltani, A., Galeshi, S., Zeinali, E., and Latifi, N. 2002. Germination, seed reserve utilization and seedling growth of chickpea as affected by salinity and seed size. Seed Science Technology 30: 51-60.

19. Struik, P. C. 2007. The canon of potato science: 25, Minituber. Potato Research 50: 305-308.

20. Vreugdenhil, D., and Sergeeva, L. I. 1999. Gibberellins and tuberization in potato. Potato Research 42: 471-481

21. Vreugdenhil, D. 2007. The canon of potato science. 39. Dormancy. Potato Research 50: 371-373.

22. Tekalign, T., and Hames, P. S. 2004. Response of potato grown under non-inductive condition to paclobutrazol: shoot growth, chlorophyll content, net photosynthesis, assimilate partitioning, tuber yield, quality and dormancy. Plant Growth Regulate 43: 227-236.

23. Tekalign, T., and Hames, P. S. 2005. Response of potato grown in a hot tropical lowland to applied paclobutrazol. II: Tuber attributes. New Zealand Journal of Crop Horticultural Science 33:43-51.