Investigating the Effect of Different Levels of Irrigation and Humic Acid Foliar Application on the Physiological Characteristics and Indigo of Indigofera tinctoria L.

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran

2 Southern Kerman Agricultural Jihad Organization, Jiroft, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Indigo (Indigofera tinctoria L.) is a flowering plant belonging to the Fabaceae family. This plant has a high ability to grow again after harvesting, and the low sensitivity of this plant to the attack of pests and diseases in hot weather conditions is one of the reasons for increasing the yield of this plant. Global climate changes have led to changes in rainfall patterns and it is predicted that periods of insufficient rainfall will lead to drought with a gradual decrease in water available to the soil of plants, causing an impact on the growth and development or early death of the plant. The unreasonable long-term use of chemical inputs, including fertilizers and pesticides, has increased environmental pollution and in some cases has had a negative impact on the yield and quality of agricultural products. One solution is to use the principles of sustainable agriculture, especially the use of organic inputs in agricultural ecosystems. Humic acid (HA) is an organic biostimulant that significantly affects plant growth and increases crop yield. The purpose of the experiment is to investigate the effect of irrigation intervals and foliar spraying of humic acid on the physiological characteristics and indigo content of Indigofera tinctoria.
Materials and Methods
This research was carried out as split plot layout based on randomized complete block design with three replications during 2019 in the agricultural research institute of Zabol Research Institute in Zahak city of Sistan and Baluchistan province in Iran. The experimental treatments were irrigation intervals of 7, 9 and 11 days as the main factor and five levels of humic acid foliar application as the sub-plot (no foliar application, foliar application with a concentration of 20, 30, 40 and 50 liters per hectare). Irrigation treatments were carried out two months after the planting date. Humic acid foliar application was started after three months from the date of planting in the flowering stage, every 15 days. The foliar spraying was done at the end of the day and at sunset with a back pump sprayer and with the same pressure on the bushes. In order to calculate the leaf yield by removing the marginal effect, the crop was harvested in the last week of November 2019 and kept in the warehouse at room temperature for 23 days. Then the dry leaves were separated and the weight of the leaves was obtained in each plot and its yield was calculated in terms of tons per hectare. Wilson's method was used to prepare ash and extract to measure the concentration of iron, zinc, phosphorus and potassium elements. The amount of photosynthetic pigments was calculated by Arnon's method. To measure guaiacol peroxidase enzyme by Fielding and Hall method, calculate ascorbate peroxidase by Yoshimura method, catalase enzyme by Beers and Caesar method, proline amount in leaves was measured by Bates method. Also, the indigo content was measured based on the method provided by Stoker et al. (1998) and Sales et al. (2006).
Results and Discussion
The results of analysis of variance showed that the effect of different levels of irrigation on chlorophyll a, catalase, iron and zinc was significant. The effect of different levels of humic acid foliar application on chlorophyll a and b, carotenoid, ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, guaiacol peroxidase, iron, zinc, potassium, phosphorus and indigo content was significant. Also, the results of the analysis of variance showed that the interaction effect of irrigation in foliar application of carotenoid humic acid, ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, guaiacol peroxidase, iron, phosphorus and indigo content was significant. The highest (39.32 mg.g-1 fresh weight) and the lowest (24.49 mg.g-1 fresh weight) content of indigo were obtained at the 7-day irrigation interval under the conditions of foliar spraying of 50 liters per hectare and the 11-day irrigation interval under the conditions of no humic acid application
Conclusion
The results of investigating the effect of reducing different levels of irrigation and increasing humic acid foliar spraying on indigo showed that the amount of chlorophyll a and b and zinc increased. Also, the increase in humic acid caused an increase in potassium and blood. At each level of irrigation, it was found that the amount of carotenoid and indigo content increased with the increase of humic acid foliar application. Some other physiological characteristics of indigo such as proline, ascorbate peroxidase, catalase and guaiacol peroxidase showed a decrease in each irrigation level with increasing humic acid foliar application. In future researches, it is possible to consider the comparison of soil application and foliar application of humic acid. In general, for the production of vesme leaves, 9-day irrigation interval in foliar application of 40 L ha-1 of humic acid is suitable; and In order to obtain more indigo content, an 11-day irrigation interval in foliar application of 40 L ha-1 of humic acid seems appropriate.

Keywords

Main Subjects

©2024 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

References

  1. Acevedo-Rodríguez, P. (1996). Flora of St. John, US Virgin Islands (Vol. 78, pp. iii+-581). Bronx, New York: New York Botanical Garden.
  2. Akbari, V., Jalili, M. R., & Farokhzad, A. R. (2015). Effect of cycocel on antioxidative activity and malondialdehyde content of, mary and mission olive (Olea europaea) cultivars under drought stress. Plant Production Technology, 15(2), 121-135. (in Persian with English abstract).
  3. Ali, A. Y. A., Ibrahim, M. E. H., Zhou, G., Elsiddig, A. M. I., Jiao, X., Zhu, G., Meng, T., Y., Ahmed, I., & Gabralla, E. (2021). Humic acid and jasmonic acid improves the growth and antioxidant defense system in salt stressed-forage sorghum plants. 07 May 2021, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-490134/v1
  4. Asgharzade, A., & Babaeian, M. (2012). Investigating the effects of humic acid and acetic acid foliar application on yield and leaves nutrient content of grape (Vitis vinifera). African Journal of Microbiology Research, 6(31), 6049-6054. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR12.425
  5. Aslani, S., Barzegar, T., & Nikbakht, J. (2019). Effect of humic acid on physiological and biochemical indices and yield of tomato under deficit irrigation. Journal of Crops Improvement, 21(2), 221-232. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22059/jci.2019.272278.2137
  6. Ayeen, A., & Shabani, M. (2005). Indigo agronomy (Neel) Indigofera tinctoria under hot and dry regions. Zeytoon, 186, 62-64. (in Persian).
  7. Balfour-Paul, J. (1998). Indigo. British Museum Press, London.
  8. Bates, S., Waldern, R. P., & Teare, E. D. (1973). Rapide determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant and Soli, 39, 205-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060
  9. Battaglia, M. L., Ketterings, Q. M., Godwin, G., & Czymmek, K. J. (2021). Conservation tillage is compatible with manure injection in corn silage system. Agronomy Journal, 113(3), 2900-2912. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20604
  10. Beers, G. R., & Sizer, I. W. (1952). A spectrophotometric Method fOr measuring the breakdoN of hydrogen peroxide by catalase. BioLogycal CHeMistry, 195(1), 133140.
  11. Bhargava, S., & Sawant, K. (2013). Drought stress adaptation: metabolic adjustment and regulation of gene expression. Plant Breeding, 132(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12004
  12. Dalvand, M., Solgi, M., & Khaleghi, A. (2018). Effects of foliar application of humic acid and drought stress on growth and physiological characteristics of marigold (Taget erecta). Journal of Soil and Plant Interactions-Isfahan University of Technology, 9(2), 67-80. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.29252/ejgcst.9.2.67
  13. Daur, I., & Bakhashwain, A. A. (2013). Effect of humic acid on growth and quality of maize fodder production. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 45(S1), 21-25.
  14. Davarpanah, S., Tehranifar, A., Davarynejad, G. H., Abadía, J., & Khorasani, R. (2018). Effect of humic acid on some physical and chemical characteristics of Pomegranate (Punica granatum Ardestani). Plant Production Technology, 18(1), 69-81. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22084/PPT.2018.9285.1525
  15. de Araujo Silva, M. M., Willadino, L., dos Santos, D. Y. A. C., Oliveira, A. F. M., & Camara, T. R. (2016). Response of Ricinus communis to in vitro water stress induced by polyethylene glycol. Plant Growth Regulation, 78, 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-015-0085-3
  16. Elfeky, S. A., Mohammed, M. A., Khater, M. S., Osman, Y. A., & Elsherbini, E. (2013). Effect of magnetite nano-fertilizer on growth and yield of Ocimum basilicumInternational Journal of Indigenous Medicinal Plants, 46(3), 1286-11293.
  17. El-Hamied, S. A. A. (2014). Response of Valencia orange to some natural and synthetic soil conditioners under north sinai (Egypt) conditions. International Journal of Advanced Research, 2(11), 802-810.
  18. Elmongy, M. S., Zhou, H., Cao, Y., Liu, B., & Xia, Y. (2018). The effect of humic acid on endogenous hormone levels and antioxidant enzyme activity during in vitro rooting of evergreen azalea. Scientia Horticulturae, 227, 234-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.09.027
  19. Emam, Y., & Zavaerh, M. (2006). Drought Tolerance in Higher Plants. Publishing Center of Tehran University, 186 p. (in Persian).
  20. Ferrara, G., Pacifico, A., Simeone, P., & Ferrara, E. (2007, June). Preliminary study on the effects of foliar applications of humic acids on ‘Italia’table grape. Proc. of the XXXth World Congress of Vine and Wine (Vol. 165). Budapest, Hungary.
  21. Fielding, J. L., & Hall, J. (1978). A biochemical and cytoChemical Study of Peroxidase ctivity in root pea. Journal of ExperimenTal Botany, 29(4), 969-981. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/29.4.969
  22. Gao, X., & Schrire, B. D. (2017). Indigofera Flora of China. eFloras: Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO & Harvard University Herbaria, Cambridge, MA.
  23. García, A. C., Santos, L. A., Izquierdo, F. G., Sperandio, M. V. L., Castro, R. N., & Berbara, R. L. L. (2012). Vermicompost humic acids as an ecological pathway to protect rice plant against oxidative stress. Ecological Engineering, 47, 203-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.06.011
  24. Ghanaatiyan, K., & Sadeghi, H. (2017). Differential responses of chicory ecotypes exposed to drought stress in relation to enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants as well as ABA concentration. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 92(4), 404-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2017.1286235
  25. Ghorbani, T., Galeshi, S., Soitani, A., & Zeynali, E. (2011, may). The effect of drought stress on growth parameters, chlorophyll and carotenoid content in the vegetative stage of chickpea plants (Cicer arietinum). 1st Special Conference about Apportunity Methods for Sustainable Agriculture. (pp. 138-143). Payame Noor University of Khuzestan, Ahvaz, Iran. (in Persian).
  26. Gilbert, K. G., Maule, H. G., Rudolph, B., Lewis, M., Vandenburg, H., Tozzi, S., & Cooke, D. (2004). Quantitative analysis of indigo and indigo precursors in leaves of Isatis spp. and Polygonum tinctorium. Biotechnology Progress, 20(4), 1289-1292. https://doi.org/10.1021/bp0300624
  27. Gomiero, T., Pimentel, D., & Paoletti, M. G. (2011). Environmental impact of different agricultural management practices: Conventional vs. organic agriculture. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 30, 95-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2011.554355
  28. Gu, J., Zhou, Z., Li, Z., Kong, X., Wang, Z., & Yang, J. (2016). Effects of the mutant with low chlorophyll content on photosynthesis and yield in rice. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 42(4), 551-560. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.00551
  29. Kafi, M., Borzooei, A., Salehi, A., Kamandi, A., Massomi, A., & Nabati, C. J. (2010). The Physiology of Environmental Stress in Plants. Published by University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. p. 502. (in Persian).
  30. Kavimani, S., Jaykar, B., De Clercq, E., Pannecouque, C., Witvrouw, M., & De Clercq, E. (2000). Studies on anti-HIV activity of Indigofera tinctoria. Hamdard Medicus, 43(1), 5-7.
  31. Keshtgar Khajedad, M., Sirousmehr, A. R., Khammari, I., & Dahmardeh, K. (2023). The Effect of Humic Acid Foliar Application on Morphophysiological Characteristics and Yield of Black Bean Plant Under Different Irrigation Regimes. Journal of Crops Improvement, 25(1), 127-142. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22059/jci.2022.322275.2538
  32. Khodamoradi, P., Amiri, J., & Dovlati, B. (2018). Influence of humic acid on some antioxidant enzymes activity and compatible metabolites in strawberry (Fragaria× ananassa Duch. cv. Sabrina) under salinity stress. Research in Pomology, 3(1), 23-35. (in Persian).
  33. Kumar, P., Lai, L., Battaglia, M. L., Kumar, S., Owens, V., Fike, J., Galbraith, J., Hong, C. O., Faris, R., Crawford, R., Crawford, J., Hansen, J., Mayton, H., & Viands, D. (2019). Impacts of nitrogen fertilization rate and landscape position on select soil properties in switchgrass field at four sites in the USA. Catena, 180, 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.04.028
  34. Latif, H. H., & Mohamed, H. I. (2016). Exogenous applications of moringa leaf extract effect on retrotransposon, ultrastructural and biochemical contents of common bean plants under environmental stresses. South African Journal of Botany, 106, 221-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2016.07.010
  35. Lemmens, R. H. M. J., & Wulijarni-Soetjipto, N. (1991). Plant Resources of South-East Asia. No. 3. Dye and tannin-producing plants, 195 p.
  36. Liu, M., Wang, C., Wang, F., & Xie, Y. (2019). Maize (Zea mays) growth and nutrient uptake following integrated improvement of vermicompost and humic acid fertilizer on coastal saline soil. Applied Soil Ecology, 142, 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.04.024
  37. Mi Na, M. N., Cai Fu, C. F., Zhang YuShu, Z. Y., Ji RuiPeng, J. R., Zhang ShuJie, Z. S., & Wang Yang, W. Y. (2018). Differential responses of maize yield to drought at vegetative and reproductive stages. Plant, Soil & Environment, 64, 260-267. https://doi.org/10.17221/141/2018-PSE
  38. Modafe Behzadi, N., Rezvani Moghaddam, P., & Jahan, M. (2018). The effect of organic and chemical fertilizers on qualitative and quantitative yield of indigo (Indigofera tinctoria) at irrigation levels under Bam climatic conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 16(1), 49-65. (in Persian). https://doi.org/10.22067/gsc.v16i1.54983
  39. Muscolo, A., Sidari, M., & Nardi, S., (2013). Humic substance: relationship between structure and activity. Deeper information suggests univocal findings. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 129, 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2012.10.012
  40. Muthulingam, M., Mohandoss, P., Indra, N., & Sethupathy, S. (2010). Antihepatotoxic efficacy of Indigofera tinctoria (Linn.) on paracetamol induced liver damage in rats. International Journal of Pharmacy & Biomedical Research, 1(1), 13-18.
  41. Nadkarni, K. M. (1998). Indian Medicinal Plants and Drugs-with their Medicinal Properties and Uses. Asiatic Publishing House, New Delhi. 450p.
  42. Nardi, S., Panuccio, M. R., Abenavoli, M. R., & Muscolo, A. (1994). Auxin-like effect of humic substances extracted from faeces of Allolobophora caliginosa and A. rosea. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 26(10), 1341-1346. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(94)90215-1
  43. O’Connell, E. (2017). Towards adaptation of water resource systems to climatic and socio-economic change. Water Resources Management, 31, 2965-2984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1734-2
  44. Paleg, L. G., & Spinall, D. (1981). The Physiology and Biochemistry of Drought Resistance in Plant. New York, Academic Press, 240 p.
  45. Rajpar, I., Bhatti, M. B., Zia-ul-Hassan, A. N., & Tunio, S. D. (2011). Humic acid improves growth, yield and oil content of Brassica compestris L. Pakistan Journal of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering and Veterinary Sciences, 27(2), 125-133.
  46. Rostami, A. A., & Rahemi, M. (2013). Screening drought tolerance in caprifig varieties in accordance to responses of antioxidant enzymes. World Applied Sciences Journal, 21(8), 1213-1219. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.21.8.91
  47. Sales, E., Kanhonou, R., Baixauli, C., Giner, A., Cooke, D., Gilbert, K., Arrilaga, I., Segura, J., & Ros, R. (2006). Sowing date, transplanting, plant density and nitrogen fertilization affect indigo production from Isatis species in a Mediterranean region of Spain. Industrial Crops and Products, 23(1), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2005.03.002
  48. Sandmann, G. (2019). Antioxidant protection from UV-and light-stress related to carotenoid structures. Antioxidants, 8(7), 219. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8070219
  49. Sarhadi, H., Afsharmanesh, G. R., & Mokhtari, Z. (2014). Effect of drought stress on some morphological traits and seed yield of indigo (Indigofera tinctoria) under different levels of nitrogen. Trends in Life Science, 3(4), 74-78.
  50. Savithramma, N. C. H., & Rao, S. K. N. (2007). Treatment in asthma of dry powder of Indigofera tinctoria Linn. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 113, 54-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2007.04.004
  51. Sayadi, A., Ahmadi, J., Bhour, A., & Hosseni, S. M. (2014). Investigation of the effect of drought and salinity stresses on phenolic compounds of Thymus vulgaris Eco-phytochemical Journal of Medicinal Plants, 2(4), 50-61. (in Persian).
  52. Shaaban, F. K., Morsey, M. M., & Mahmoud, T. Sh. M. (2015). Influence of spraying yeast extract and humic acid on fruit maturity stage and storablitity of canino apricot fruits. International Journal of ChemTec Research, 8(6), 530-543.
  53. Shah, Z. H., Rehman, H. M., Akhtar, T., Alsamadany, H., Hamooh, B. T., Mujtaba, T., Daur, I., Al Zahrani, Y., Alzahrani, H. A., Ali, S., & Yang, S. H. (2018). Humic substances: Determining potential molecular regulatory processes in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 263. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00263
  54. Stoker, K.G., Cooke, D.T., & Hill, D. J. (1998). An improved method for the large-scale processing of woad (Isatis tinctoria) for possible commercial production of woad indigo. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 71(4), 315-320. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1998.0329
  55. Tyagi, P. K., Rai, V. K., Pahria, A. K., Sambath Kumar, S., Singh, Y., Sharma, M., & Goyal, M. (2010). Preliminary phytochemical screening and evaluation of anti-inflammatory activity of ethanolic extract of leaves of Indigofera tinctoria Linn. Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research, 3(1), 47-50.
  56. Waraich, E. A., Ahmad, R., & Ashraf, M. Y. (2011). Role of mineral nutrition in alleviation of drought stress in plants. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5(6), 764-777.
  57. Wilson, J. R. (1983). Effects of water stress on in vitro dry matter digestibility and chemical composition of herbage of tropical pasture species. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 34(4), 377-390.
  58. Yadollahi, P., Asgharipour, M. R., Kheiri, N., & Ghaderi, A. (2015). Effects of drought stress and different types of organic fertilizers on the yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius). Journal of Oil Plants Production, 1(2), 27-40. (in Persian with English abstract).
  59. Yang, D., Ni, R., Yang, S., Pu, Y., Qian, M., Yang, Y., & Yang, Y. (2021). Functional characterization of the Stipa purpurea P5CS gene under drought stress conditions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(17), 9599. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22179599
  60. Yashimura, K., Yabute, Y., Ishikawa, T., & Shigeoka, S. (2000). Expression of spinach ascorbate peroxidase isoenzymes in response to oxidative stresses. Plant Physiology, 123, 223-233.
  61. Zhang, X., Lei, L., Lai, J., Zhao, H., & Song, W., (2018). Effects of drought stress and water recovery on physiological responses and gene expression in maize seedlings. BMC Plant Biology, 18(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1281-x
  62. Zhang, Y., Yu, S., Li, C. F., Wang, Y. B., & Diao, Z. F. (2013). Response characteristics of plant growth and leaf photochemical activity of sugar beet seedlings to different nitrogen application leaves. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 27, 1391-1400. https://doi.org/10.11869/hnxb.2013.09.1391
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image
Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research
Volume 22, Issue 3 - Serial Number 75
October 2024
Pages 277-290

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 09 December 2023
  • Revise Date: 10 May 2024
  • Accept Date: 13 May 2024
  • First Publish Date: 31 July 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics