The Effect of Integrated Chemical and Biological Fertilizers on Growth Indices and Mucilage Yield of Isabgol (plantagoovata Forssk) across Different Plant Densities

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• A Sepehri
• M Samadi

Bu-Ali Sina University

10.22067/gsc.v13i3.24978

Abstract

Introduction
Isabgol (plantagoovata Forssk) is an important annual medicinal plant which is under cultivation in Iran. Isabgol has been used in medicine since ancient times, however, it has only been cultivated as a medicinal plant in recent decades. It is a diuretic, alleviates kidney and bladder complaints, gonorrhea, arthritis and hemorrhoids. In general, plants known as medicinal are rich in secondary metabolites and have potential as drugs. The biosynthesis of the secondary metabolites is controlled genetically and affected strongly by environmental factors especially chemical fertilizers. The environmental and economic impacts of chemical fertilizer application such as water pollution, low quality of agricultural production and decreasing soil productivity have encouraged farmers to use alternative nutrient sources. Sustainable farming on the basis of natural fertilizer application with the aim of omitting or decreasing chemical elements is a desirable approach to prevent these problems. Biofertilizers are some non-symbiotic and symbiotic microbes in the soil that stimulate plant growth and contribute the improvement of ecosystem. Many genera of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria such as Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Bacillus and Pseudomonas are used as biofertilizers for economically important crops. Several studies have shown that beneficial microbes, such as Azotobacter and Azospirillum, not only affect nitrogen fixation but also exhibit other favorable properties such as production of growth hormones. Nitrogen and phosphate chemical fertilizers could be replaced by biofertilizers containing Azotobacter, Azospirilium, Bacillus and Pseudomonas. In this study, we evaluated the effects of integrated application of chemical fertilizers and bio-fertilizers under different plant densities on growth indices, grain and mucilage yield of Isabgol.
Materials and Methods
A field experiment was conducted based on randomized complete block design with three replications at the Agricultural Research Station of Bu-Ali Sina University in2011. The mean annual precipitation was 330 mm. The Soil of experimental field was loamy clay with pH 7.7, containing 8.2 mg kg-1P, 0.1 mg kg-1N , 220 mg
kg-1K, and EC 0.409 dS m-1. Three levels of plant densities (70, 100, and 130 plant per m2) and three combinations of fertilizers including 100% chemical fertilizer (control), 50% chemical fertilizer+Nitroxin (Azotobacter sp., Azospirilium sp.) and Biophosphorus (Bacillus sp., Pseudomonas sp.), 25% chemical fertilizer+Nitroxin and Biophosphorus were applied. Two biofertilizers including Nitroxin (2 liters per hectare) and Biophosphor (100 gram per hectare) were used. The population of bacteria in Nitroxin was 108 cell ml-1 and in Biophosphorus was 107 cell gr-1.The plant height, number of branches in plant, maximum leaf arearindex (LAImax), maximum crop growth rate (CGRmax), total dry matter (TDM), and grain and mucilage yield was measured. All variables were submitted to analysis of variance using the statistical analysis system (SAS, 9.1) and significant differences among means were identified by Duncan test at the 0.05 level of significance.
Results and Discussion
The interaction between density and fertilizer treatments was significant forplant height, number of branches in plant, LAImax, CGRmaxTDM, grain and mucilage yield, whereas it was not significant for length of spike. Acrossall fertilizer treatments, increasing plant density decreased the number of branches per plant. The grain yield obtained from 130 plants per m2 was on average 15.49% and 41.44% higher than 100 and 70 plants per m2, respectively. Grain yield was mostly affected by the application of 50 % of chemical fertilizer + biofertilizersfor allthree plant densities. The highest mucilage yield and TDM (314.69 unit and 497.65 gr m-2, respectively) were obtained from 130 plants per m2 by using 50% of chemical fertilizer + biofertilizers. In density of 130 plant per m2, there was no significant differencebetween using 100% chemical fertilizer and 50 % of chemical fertilizer + biofertilizers. The lowest mucilage yield was obtained from 70 plants per m2 by using 25 % of chemical fertilizer + biofertilizers.
Conclutions
The integrated application of chemical fertilizer and biofertilizer showed maximum effect on growth indices and the quality and quantity characteristics of Isabgol, therefore application of 50% chemical fertilizers+biofertilizers and 130 plants per m2 is recommended in similar conditions.

Keywords

• Biophosphorus
• CGR max
• LAI max
• Nitroxin

20.1001.1.20081472.1394.13.3.5.9

---

References

1. Ahmadi, A., Nasrollahzadeh, A., Valiloo, R., and Khalili, J. 2009. Effects of planting density and nitrogen fertilization on yield and percent protein of durum Wheat var. Aria. Journal of Agricultural Science 9: 17-35. (in Persian with English abstract).

2. Azazz, N. A., Hassan, E. A., and Hamad, E. H. 2009. The chemical constituent and vegetative and yielding characteristic of Fennel plants treated with organic and biofertilizer instead of mineral fertilizer. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 3 (2): 579-587.

3. Dorry, M. A. 2006. Effects of seed rate and planting dates on seed yield and yield components of Plantago ovata in dry farming. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 22 (3): 262-269. (in Persian with English abstract).

4. EL-Zeiny, O. A. H. 2007. Effect of bio fertilizers and root exudates of two weed as a source of natural growth regulators on growth and productivity of bean plants (phaseolus vulgaris L.) under different water regimes. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 3 (5): 440-446.

5. Fallahi, H. A., Mirzaei, A., Siabidi, M. M., Siyadat, S. A., and Fotohi, F. 2011. Evaluation of Mungo bean (Vigna radiata) growth indices as affected by various planting patterns. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 1 (2): 85-100. (in Persian with English abstract).

6. Fikrettin, S., Chakmakji, R., and Kantar, F. 2004. Sugar beet and barley yield in relation to inoculation with N2-fixing and Phosphate solubilizing bacteria. Plant and Soil 256: 123-129.

7. Ghosh, P. K., Ramesh, P., Bandyopadhyay, K. K., Tripathi, A. K., Hati, K. M., Misra, A. K., and Acharya, C. L. 2004. Comparative effectiveness of cattle manure, poultry manure, phosphor compost and fertilizer-NPK on three cropping systems in Vertisols of semi-arid tropics. Crop yields and system performance. Bioresource Technology 95 (1): 77-83.

8. Haj Seyed Hadi, M. R., Darzi, M. T., and Ghandehari, Z. 2012. Effects of irrigation treatment and Azospirillum inoculation on yield and yield component of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.). Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 6 (30): 4553-4561.

9. Hosseinpour, M., Pirzad, A., Habibi, H., and Fotokian, M. H. 2011. Effect of biological nitrogen fertilizer (Azotobacter) and plant density on yield, yield components and essential oil of anise. Journal of Agricultural and Sustainable Production 2 (1): 70-86. (in Persian with English abstract).

10. Kalayasundram, N. K., Pateb, P. B., and Dalat, K. C., 1982. Nitrogen need of Plantago ovata in reaction to the available nitrogen in soil. Indian journal of Agricultural Science 52: 240-242.

11. Karami, A., Sepehri, A., Hamzei, J., and Salimi, Gh. 2010. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorous biofertilizers on quantitative and qualitative traits of Borage (Borago officinalis L.) under water deficit stress. Journal of Plant Production Technology 11 (1): 37-50. (in Persian with English abstract).

12. Khalil, M. K. 2006. How far would Plantago afra L. Respond to bio and organic manures amendments. Research Journal of Agriculture and biological Sciences 2 (1): 12-21.

13. Khandan Bejandi, T., Seyed Sharifi, R., Sedghi, M., Asgari Zakaria, R., Namvarl, A., and Jafari Moghaddam, M. 2008. Effect of plant density, Rhizobia and microelements on yield and some of morph-physiological characteristics of pea. Electronic Journal of Crop Production 3 (1): 139-157. (in Persian with English abstract).

14. Khorramdel, S., Koocheki, A., Nassiri Mahallati, M., Ghorbani, R. 2005. Application effects of bio fertilizers on the growth indices of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Research 6 (2): 285-294. (in Persian with English abstract).

15. Kokalis-Buerelle, N., Kloepper, J. W., and Reddy, M. S. 2006. Plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria as transplant amendments and their effects on Indigenous Rhizosphere microorganisms. Journal of Applied Soil Ecology 31:91-100.

16. Moosavi, S. Gh., Sadegh Zadeh Hemayati, S., Seghatoleslami, M. J., and Ansarinia, E. 2012. Effect of planting date and plant density on morphological traits, yield and water use efficiency of Plantago ovata. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 6 (10): 1873-1878.

17. Nagananda, G. S., Das, A., Bhattacharya, S., and Kalpana, T. 2010. In vitro studies on the effects of biofertilizers (Azotobacter and Rhizobium) on seed germination and development of Trigonella foenum – graecum L. using a novel glass marble containing liquid medium. International Journal of Botany 6: 394 - 403.

18. Pouryousef, M., Mazaheri, D., Chaee Chi, M., Rahimi, A., and Tavakoli, A. 2009. The effect of different treatments on soil fertility properties of agro-morphological and mucilage of Plantago ovata. Electronic Journal of Crop Production 3 (2): 193-212. (in Persian with English abstract).

19. Rahimi, A., Jahansoz, M. R., Rahimian Mashhadi, H. R., Pouryosef, M., and Roosta, H. R., 2008. Effect of drought and plant density on yield and phonological stages of Isabgol and French psyllium with using growth degree days. Electronic Journal of Crop Production 2 (1): 57-74. (in Persian with English abstract).

20. Ramroudi, M., Galavi, M., Barat, A. A., and Allahdoo, M. 2011. Effect of micronutrient and irrigation deficit on yield and yield components of Isabgol (Plantago ovata Forsk) using multivariate analysis. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment 9 (1): 247- 251.

21. Singh, D., Chand, S., Anvar, M., and Patra, D. 2003. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization to growth of Plantago ovata. Indian Journal of Agronomy 40 (3): 529-531.

22. Suleyman, K. 2004. The effect of different row spacing on yield component and essential oil content of Coriander. Master thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Ankara University, Turkey.

23. Urashima, Y., and Hori, K. 2003. Selection of PGPR which promotes the growth of spinach. Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 74: 157-162.

24. Wu, S. C., Cao, Z. H., Li, Z. G., Cheung, K. C., and Wong, M. H. 2005. Effects of bio fertilizer containing N-fixer, P and K solubilizers and AM fungi on maize growth. A greenhouse trial. Geoderma 125: 155-166.

25. Yadav, R. D., Keshwa, G. L., and Yadav, S. S. 2002. Effect of integrated use of FYM, urea and Sulphur on growth and yield of isabgol (Plantago ovata). Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Sciences 25: 668-671.

26. Yasar, E., and Patwardhan, A. M. 2007. Effect of Aztobacter and Azospirillium inoculation and chemical fertilizers on growth and productivity of Canola. Asian Journal of Plant Science 6 (1): 77-82.

27. Zahed, M., Galeshi, S., Latifi, N., Soltani, A., and Calate, M., 2010. The effect of plant density on seed yield and yield components in modern and old wheat cultivars. Electronic Journal of Crop Production 4 (1): 201-215. (in Persian with English abstract).