The Effect of Drought Stress on Root and Shoot Growth of Kochia (Kochia scoparia L.) under Greenhouse Conditions

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Drought is undoubtedly one of the most important environmental stresses limiting the productivity of crop plants around the world. An optimal partitioning of dry matter between root and shoot, therefore is of crucial importance for crop yield under drought stress. Deficit irrigation strategy and planting crops with low water requirements and low expectations, for example, Kochia is very important under drought stress. Kochia is a salt- and drought-tolerant species that can be grown on drought soils, yielding fodder in quantities approaching that produced by alfalfa. The aim of this greenhouse study was investigating root and shoot growth of Kochia under drought stress conditions.
Materials and Methods: To study the effects of drought stress on root and shoot growth of kochia, a pot experiment was carried out as completely randomized design with three replications in University of Ferdowsi in 2013. There were 9 treatments included control (no stress) (NS-NS=100% field capacity (FC)), moderate drought stress (70% FC) during the vegetative phase (MS-NS), severe drought stress (30% FC) during the vegetative phase (SS-NS), moderate drought stress during the reproductive phase (NS-MS), severe drought stress during the reproductive phase (NS-SS), moderate drought stress during the vegetative phase and severe drought stress during the reproductive phase (MS-SS), severe drought stress during the vegetative phase and moderate drought stress during the reproductive phase (SS-MS), moderate drought stress during total growth period (MS-MS) and severe drought stress during total growth period (SS-SS). At the beginning of anthesis, plant height and branch number were recorded. Then plants were harvested and leaves, stems, and roots were separated. The fresh weight of the organs was recorded. Root volume was measured. Leaf area measured using a leaf area meter (LI-COR model) and root area was measured by Atkinson method. Then, leaves, stems, and roots dried in an oven at 75°C for 48 hours until mass reached and dry weight was recorded. For statistical analysis, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and LSD test were performed using SAS ver. 9.1 software.
Results and Discussion: Results showed that the highest and lowest plant height, leaf area, leaf, stem and total fresh and dry weight observed in control and severe drought stress during growth period, respectively. Significance of traits related to plant aerial parts due to morphological changes of root plants, which is actually a plant response to drought stress. Also, effect of drought stress was significant on root length, area and volume, fresh and dry weight, root length ratio to plant height. The highest and lowest of these traits were observed in control and severe drought stress during growth period, respectively. Drought stress thereby mostly reduced plant height and increased at least root length, leading to higher root/shoot ratio. Most importantly, the length of root was greater in the moderate drought-treated plants than the control plants at the end of the drought and recovery periods. Number of lateral branches and root dry weight/shoot dry weight ratio did not differ significantly with control. Generally, root and shoot growth under drought stress conditions is reduced that the amount of reduction depends on the growth stage of the plant, intensity and duration of the stress.
Conclusions: Finally, this study showed that the maximum amount of Kochia forage was obtained when the water is 100% FC to increase the number and size of the cells and, consequently, increase the yield. However, Kochia forage decreased 19% by decreasing 30% of irrigation water in treatments of moderate stress during total growth period in compared to the control plants. In addition to saving water, more land can be cultivated. 

Keywords


  1. Ahmadi, A. 2003. The effect of methods of applied management to preserve or destroy the rangelands of the Shoric and hajue oregions of western Azerbaijan. Iranian journal of regland and desert research 10 (4): 471-489. (in Persian with English abstract).
  2. Aliabadi Farahani, H., Lebaschi, M. H., Shiranirad, A. H., Valadabadi, A. R. and Daneshian, J. 2008. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, different levels of phosphorus and drought stress on water use efficiency, relative water content and proline accumulation rate of Coriander. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 2 (6): 125-131.
  3. Alizadeh, A. 2009. Water, soil and plant relation. 9th edition, Astane Godse Razavi Press, 484p. (in Persian).
  4. Asghari, A., Darghahi, Y., Rasulzadeh, A., and Ahmadian, M. 2014. Evaluation of morphological traits of sesame cultivars (Sesamum indicum) under drought stress with using factor analysis .Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 11 (4): 593-607. (in Persian with English abstract).
  5. Cai, Q., Zhang, Y., Sun, Z., Zheng, J., W., Bai, Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Feng, L., Feng, C., Zhang, Z., Yang, N., Evers, J., and Zhang, L. 2017. Morphological plasticity of root growth under mild water stress increases water use efficiency without reducing yield in maize. Biogeosciences 14: 3851-3858.
  6. Cakir, R. 2004. Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of corn. Field Crops Research 89: 1-16.
  7. Corrêa de Souza, T., César Magalhães, P., Mauro de Castro, E., Politi Duarte, V., and Oliveira Lavinsky, A. 2016. Corn root morphoanatomy at different development stages and yield under water stress. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 51 (4): 330-339.
  8. Demirevska, K., Samina, L., Vassileva, V., Vaseva, I., Grigorova, B., and Feller, U. 2008. Drought-induced leaf protein alterations in sensitive and tolerant wheat varieties. General and Applied Plant Physiology 34: 79-102.
  9. Eric, O., and Robert, E. S. 2007. Regulation of root growth responses to water deficit. In: Jenks M.A, P.M. Hasegawa, S.M. Jain (Eds.), Advances in Molecular Breeding Toward Drought and Salt Tolerant Crops, springer, 33-53.
  10. Fageria, N. K., Baligar, V. C., and Clark, R. B. 2006. Physiology of Crop Production. Food Products Press. Binghamton, NY. 345p.
  11. Fang, Y., Du, Y., Wang, J., Wu, A., Qiao, S., Xu, B., Zhang, S., Siddique, K. H. M., and Chen, Y. 2017. Moderate Drought Stress Affected Root Growth and Grain Yield in Old, Modern and Newly Released Cultivars of Winter Wheat. Frontiers in Plant Science 8, 672. Published online 2017 May 1. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00672.
  12. Friesen, L. F., Beckie, H. J., Warwick, S. I., and Van Acker, R. C. 2009. The biology of Canadian weeds. 138. Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. Canadian Journal Plant Science 89: 141-167.
  13. Jami Al-Ahmadia, M. and M. Kafi. 2007. Cardinal temperatures for germination of Kochia scoparia (L.). Journal of Arid Environments 68: 308-314.
  14. Kafi, M., Asadi, H. and Ganjeali, A. 2010a. Possible utilization of high-salinity waters and application of low amounts of water for production of the halophyte Kochia scoparia as alternative fodder in saline agroecosystems. Agricultural Water Management 97: 139-147.
  15. Kafi, M., Borzuei, A., Salehi, M., Kamandi, A., Masoumi, A., and Nabati, J. 2010b. Physiology of Environmental Stresses in Plants. Publications University of Mashhad. 502 p. (in Persian).
  16. Kargar, S. M. A., Ghannadha, M. R., Bozorgi-pour, R., Khaje Ahmad attari, A. A., and Babaei, H. R. 2004. An investigation of drought tolerance indices in some soybean genotypes under restricted irrigation conditions. Iranian Journal Agriculture Science 35: 129-142. (in Persian with English abstract).
  17. Kirkham, M. B. 2005. Principles of soil and plant water relations. Elsevier Academic Press. 500 pp.
  18. Karimian, M. A., Galovi, M., Dahmarde, M., and Kafi, M. 2015. Effect of drought stress and different levels of potassium on qualitative and quantitative yield Kochia (Kochia scoparia). New Finding in Agriculture 8 (3): 239-250. (in Persian with English abstract).
  19. Kulkarni, M., and Swati, P. 2009. Evaluating variability of root size system and its constitutive traits in hot pepper (Capsicum annum ) under water stress. Science Horticulture 120: 159-166.
  20. Li, C., Sun, J., Li, F., Zhou, X., Li, Z., Qiang, X., and Guao, D. 2011. Response of root morphology and distribution in maize to alternate furrow irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 98: 1789-1798.
  21. Masoumi, A. 2011. Effect of drought stress on physiological characteristics of two ecotypes of Kochia (Kochia scoparia) under farm and greenhouse. Ph.D. thesis of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran. (in Persian with English abstract).
  22. Muller, B., Pantin, F., Génard, M., Turc, , Freixes, S., Piques, M., and Gibon, Y. 2011. Water deficits uncouple growth from photosynthesis, increase C content, and modify the relationships between C and growth in sink organs. Journal of Experimental Botany 62: 1715-29.
  23. Musavi Fazl, S. H., Alizadeh, A., Ansari, H., and Rezvani Moghaddam, P. 2015. Effect of Different levels of Irrigation Water and Potassium Fertilizer on Root and Shoot Growth of Forage Sorghum. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage 4 (8): 747-756. (in Persian with English abstract).
  24. Nabati, J., Kafi, M., Nezami, A., Rezvanimoghaddm, P., Masoumi, A., and Zaremehrjerdi, M. 2011. Effect of salinity on forage yield and components yield and morphological traits of Kochia (Kochia scoparia ). Journal of Iranian Crop Science 42 (4): 735-743. (in Persian with English abstract).
  25. Niakan, M., and Ghorbanli, M. L. 2007. The effect of drought stress on growth parameters, photosynthetic factors, content of protein, Na and K in shoot and root in two soybean cultivars. The Iranian Journal of botany 8: 17-32. (in Persian with English abstract).
  26. Payero Jose, O., Steven Melvin, A. R., Suat Irmak, B. C., and David Tarkalson, A. 2006. Yield response of corn to deficit irrigation in a semiarid climate agricultural water management 84: 101-112.
  27. Riasi, A., Danesh Mesgaran, M., Stern, M. D., and Ruiz Moreno, M. J. 2008. Chemical composition, in situ ruminal degradability and post-ruminal disappearance of dry matter and crude protein from the halophytic plants Kochia scoparia, Atriplex dimorphostegia, Suaeda arcuata and Gamanthus gamacarpus. Animal Feed Science Technology 141: 209-219.
  28. Saki Nejad, T., Bakhshande, A., Boromand Nasab, S., and Payande, K. 2010. Effect of drought stress on corn root growth. Report and Opinion 2 (2): 47-53.
  29. Salehi, M. 2011. Salinity and water deficient effects on quantitative and qualitative production and physio-morphological characteristics of Kochia scoparia. Ph.D. thesis of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, (in Persian with English abstract).
  30. Salehpour, M., Ebadi, A., Izadi, M., and Jamaati-e-Somarin, S. 2009. Evaluation of water stress and nitrogen fertilizer effects on relative water content, membrane stability index, chlorophyll and some other traits of lentils (Lens culinaris ) under hydroponics conditions. Journal Environment Science 3 (1): 103-109.
  31. Saxena, M. P. 2003. Management of Agricultural Drought: Agronomic and Genetic Options. Science Publishers, INC.
  32. Shah, F. R., Ahmad, N., Masood, K. R., and Zahid D. M. 2008. The influence of cadmium and chromium on the biomass production of shisham (Dalbergia sissoo roxb.) seedlings. Pakistan Journal Botany 40 (4) 1341-1348.
  33. Shan, L., Yang, C., Li, Y., Duana, Y., Geng, D., Li, Z., Zhang, R., Duan, G., Вас, А. 2015. Effects of drought stress on root physiological traits and root biomass allocation of Reaumuria soongorica. Acta Ecologica Sinica 35: 155-159.
  34. Siddiqui, Z. S., Shahid, H., Cho, J. L., Park, S. H., Ryu, T. H., and Park, S. C. 2016. Physiological responses of two halophytic grass species under drought stress environment Acta Botnica Croatica 36: 31-38.
  35. Solaimani, M. R., Kafi, M., Ziaee, M., and Shabahang, J. 2008. Effect of limited irrigation with saline water on forage yield of two local populations of Kochia scoparia Schrad, Water and Soil 22 (2): 307-317. (in Persian with English abstract).
  36. Waldron, B. L., Eun, J. S., ZoBell, D. R., and Olson, K. C. 2010. Forage kochia (Kochia prostrata) for fall and winter grazing. Small Ruminant Research 91: 47-55.
  37. Wang, H., Siopongco, J., Wade, L., and Yamauchi, A. 2009. Fractal analysis on root systems of rice plants in response to drought stress. Environment and Experimental Botany 65: 338-344.
  38. Ziaee, S. M., Kafi, M., Khazaee, H. R., Shabahang, J., and Soleimani, M. R. 2008. Effect of planting density and cutting frequency on forage and grain yields of kochia (Kochia scoparia) under saline water irrigation. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 6: 335-342. (in Persian with English abstract).
CAPTCHA Image