The Effect of Planting Dates and Distances on the Quality Characteristics and Biomass of Camelina (Camelina sativa L. Crantz)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Crop Sciences, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran

2 Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Mazandaran Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Sari, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Fodder supply in Iran is considered as one of the most important limiting factors in the field of livestock breeding and production. Camelina (Camelina sativa L. Crantz) plant from the Brassicaceae family is able to grow in different weather and soil conditions and needs less water, fertilizer, and pesticides than other oilseeds. This medicinal-oil product is a rich source of oil (28 to 40 percent) and omega-3 fatty acids, which can also be consumed in human diets. On the other hand, about 90 percent of the fatty acids in camelina oil are unsaturated, and due to its high alpha-tocopherols and vitamin E content, it does not require any additives to increase the shelf life of the oil, which is why it can be considered a high-quality edible oil. This research was conducted to introduce camelina and to evaluate the effects of planting date and spacing on oil yield and the quality of camelina fodder in Mazandaran Province.
Materials and Methods
This experiment was carried out as factorial based on a randomized complete block design in three replications at Bayekola Agricultural Research Station (Mazandaran Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Training Center). Five planting dates (November 5, November 21, December 5, December 21, and January 4) and five planting distances (15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 cm) were selected as the study factors. Each treatment was planted in a plot consisting of six lines, and the distance between the plots was determined as one unplanted line. At the 50% flowering stage, biomass yield was determined by harvesting four square meters from the middle rows of each plot. Additionally, forage quality traits were assessed, including oil percentage, neutral detergent fiber percentage (NDF%), acid detergent fiber percentage (ADF%), crude protein percentage (CP%), nitrogen percentage (N%), and ash percentage.
Results and Discussion
The results of analysis variance of the studied traits showed that the interaction between planting distance and planting date had a significant effect on most of the traits of camelina. The results indicated that the planting date of December 5 produced the highest oil percentages at planting distances of 25 cm, 20 cm, and 30 cm (6.1%, 6.0%, and 6.0%, respectively). Oil content increased from the November 5 planting date to the December 5 planting date, but declined with the January 4 planting date. The lowest values for neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were observed in the 30 cm planting distance treatment with the December 5 planting date (60.7%) and the November 21 planting date (39.8%), respectively. Planting distance of 25 cm and planting date of December 5 showed the highest percent of crude protein (15.8), while, the treatment of planting distance of 25 cm and planting date of November 5 showed the highest plant ash percent (10.0), which had no significant difference with the treatment of 30 cm planting distance and planting date of December 5 (9.3). The highest biomass yield of camelina was obtained in the treatment with a planting date of November 21 and a planting distance of 25 cm (1778 g m-2). In all planting distances, the biomass yield reached its maximum on the planting date of November 21, and with a delay in planting, a downward trend in the trait was observed, when the lowest value was obtained in the treatment of planting date of January 4 and a planting distance of 35 cm (972 g m-2).
Conclusion
In general, according to the obtained results, planting distance of 25 to 30 cm and planting date of November 21 to December 5 with high oil and protein content and low NDF and ADF and can be a suitable candidate for the production of high quality and quantity camellia fodder.

Keywords

Main Subjects


©2024 The author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

  1. Ahmadian Kooshkghazi, M. E., & Madandoust, M. (2022). Effect of planting date on growth, seed yield and oil quality of camelina (Camelina sativa Crantz). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 24(1), 19-33. (in Persian with English abstract). http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.15625540.1401.24.1.1.2
  2. (1990). Official methods of analysis, 15th Edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA.
  3. Badvan, H., & Alavi Fazel, M. (2021). Assessment of the low irrigation and change in plant density on water use efficiency and yield and yield components of maize (S.C 704). Plant Productions, 44(2), 271-282. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22055/ppd.2020.30499.1797
  4. Chaturvedi, S., Bhattacharya, A., Khare, S. K., & Kaushik, G. (2018). Camelina sativa: An Emerging Biofuel Cro In: Hussain C. (eds), Handbook of Environmental Materials Management. (pp. 1-38) Springer, Cham.
  5. Fuladvand, M., & Yadavi, A. (2015). Effect of plant density, rate and split application of nitrogen fertilizer on quality characteristics and nitrogen use efficiency of safflower under weed competition. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 13(2), 358-368. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/GSC.V13I2.31709
  6. Ghamkhar, K., Croser, J., Aryamanesh, N., Campbell, M., Kon'kova, N., & Francis, C. (2019). Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz) as an alternative oilseed: Molecular and ecogeographic analysis. Genome, 53(7), 558-567. https://doi.org/10.1139/g10-034
  7. Gholamhoseini, M, Danaie, A. K., & Fallah Toosi, A. (2023). Determining the most suitable planting arrangement, plant density and genotype of sesame in Behbahan region. Plant Productions, 45(4), 575-587. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22055/ppd.2022.40492.2023.
  8. Heydarzade, M., Ehteshami, M. R., & Rabiee, M. (2022). Effect of planting date and plant density on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of Guar forage (Cluster beans). Journal of Crops Improvement, 24(3), 919-931. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22059/jci.2021.324335.2557
  9. Ijoyah, M. O., Idoko, J. A., & Iorlamen, T. (2015). Effects of intra-row spacing of sesame (Sesamum indicum) and frequency of weeding on yields of maize-sesame intercrop in makurdi, Nigeria. International Letters of Natural Sciences, 38, 16-26. https://doi.org/10.56431/p-hu2w34
  10. Iptas, S., & Acar, A. A. (2006). Effects of hybrid and row spacing on maize forage yield and quality. Plant Soil Environment, 52(11), 515-522. https://doi.org/10.17221/3543-PSE
  11. Iskandarov, U., Kim, H. J., & Cahoon, E. B. (2014). Camelina: An emerging oilseed platform for advanced biofuels and bio-based materials. In Plants and Bioenergy (pp. 131-140). Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/1007/978-1-4614-9329-7-8
  12. Khajehpour, H. R. (2012). Fundamentals and foundations of Agriculture. Jahad University Press. Isfahan University of Technology, Iran. 398 p. (in Persian).
  13. Kurasiak-Popowska, D., Tomkowiak, A., Człopińska, M., Bocianowski, J., Weigt, D., & Nawracała, J. (2018). Analysis of yield and genetic similarity of Polish and Ukrainian Camelina sativa Industrial Crops and Products, 123, 667-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.07.001
  14. Minbashi Moeini, M. (1996). The effects of planting date and plant density on the yield and quality of corn M.Sc. Thesis, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran, 132 pp.
  15. Mohammadi-Nejad, R., Bahramian, S., & Kahrizi, D. (2018). Evaluation of physicochemical properties, fatty acid composition and oxidative stability of Camelina sativa (DH 1025) oil. Journal of Food Science Technology, 15(17), 261-269. (in Persian with English abstract).
  16. Moser, B. R. (2010). Camelina (Camelina sativa) oil as a biofuels feedstock: Golden opportunity or false hope? Lipid Technology, 22, 270-273. https://doi.org/10.1002/lite.201000068
  17. Naibi Hajilar, S., & Hassanzadeh, A. (2016). Effects of plant population and planting pattern on vegetative and reproductive characteristics of castor bean (Ricinus communis) plant. Applied Field Crops Research, 29(2), 83-94. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22092/AJ.2016.109609
  18. Najafinezhad, H., Shakeri, P., & Amirpour Robat, M. (2020). Effect of planting date and plant density on forage yield and quality of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) varieties in cold temperate region of Kerman province in Iran. Seed and Plant Journal, 36(4), 439-460. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22092/SPPI.2021.123894
  19. Naseri, R., Fasihi, K., Hatami, A., & Poursyahbidi, M. M. (2010). Effect of planting pattern on yield, yield components, oil and protein contents in winter safflower cv. Sina under rainfed conditions. Iranian Journal of Crop Science, 12(3), 227- (in Persian with English abstract). http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.15625540.1389.12.3.1.2
  20. Obeng, E., Obour, A. K., Nelson, N. O., Moreno, J. A., Ciampitti, I. A., Wang, D., & Durrett, T. P. (2019). Seed yield and oil quality as affected by camelina cultivar and planting date. Journal of Crop Improvement, 33(2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2019.1566186
  21. Oddy, V. U., Robards, G. E., & low, S. G. (1983). Prediction of in-vivo dry matter digestibility from the fiber and nitrogen content of a feed, In Feed Information and Animal production. G. E. Robards and R. G Packham (eds). Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux. Australia, p. 295-298.
  22. Pouramir, F., Nassiri Mahallati, M., Koocheki, A., & Ghorbani, R. (2010). Assessment of sesame and chickpea yield and yield components in the replacement series intercropping. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 8(5), 747-757. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/GSC.V8I5.8016
  23. Ramezani, M., & Rezaei Souckt Abandani, R. (2010). Investigating the density and arrangement of planting on the quality indicators of silage corn in the second crop of Mazandaran. Crop Physiology Journal, 3(10), 49-66. (in Persian with English abstract).
  24. Raziei, Z., Kahrizi, D., Rostami -Ahmadvandi Falah, H. F., & Karami, F. (2016). Production and fatty acid characterization of DH1025 a doubled haploid Camelina sativa line. International Conference on Researches in Science and Engineering. 28 July 2016. Istanbul University, Turkey.
  25. Sarkees, N. A., & Tahir, D. S. H. (2016). Seed yield and oil content of safflower as affected by genotypes and sowing dates. The Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 47, 56-65.
  26. Sarmadnia, G. R., & Kochaki, A. (1999). Physiology of Agricultural Plants. Jihad Deneshgahi of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
  27. Schillinger, W. F., Wysocki, D. J., Chastain, T. G., Guy, S. O., & Karow, R. S. (2012). Camelina: Planting date and method effects on stand establishment and seed yield. Field Crops Research, 130, 138-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.02.019
  28. Sharafi, S., & Ramroudi, M. (2022). Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative of Medicago scutellata affected by sowing date, sowing depth, and seeding rate. Journal of Agroecology, 13(4), 689-704. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/JAG.V13I4.85812
  29. Solymani, A. A., Kamkar, B., Zinali, A., & Mokhtarpur, H. (2010). Effects of planting date and harvesting time on the quality characteristics of pear millet forage (Pennisetum glaucum). Crop Production, 3(4), 143-160. (in Persian with English abstract). https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.2008739.1389.3.4.9.0
  30. Toncea, I., Necseriu, D., Prisecaru, B., Balint, L. N., Ghilvacs, M. I., & Popa, M. (2013). The seed’s and oil composition of camelia - first camelina (Camelina sativa Crantz), Rom. Romanian Biotechnology Letters, 18(5), 8594-8602.
  31. Van Soest, P. J. (1990). Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds, II, A rapid method for the determination of fiber and lignin. Journal of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, 73(4), 491-497. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/73.4.491
  32. Zanetti, F., Eynck, C., Christou, M., Krzyżaniak, M., Righini, D., Alexopoulou, E., & Monti, A. (2017). Agronomic performance and seed quality attributes of camelina (Camelina sativa crantz) in multi-environment trials across Europe and Canada. Industrial Crops and Products, 107, 602-608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.06.022
  33. Zarei, S., Hassibi, P., Kahrizi, D., & Safieddin Ardebili, S. M. (2022). Effect of nitrogen application on camelina‎ (Camelina sativa)‎‏ ‏oil seed yield and yield components at different planting dates. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 19(4), 311-325. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/JCESC.2021.37179.0
  34. Zizy, A., Nematallh, Y. O. M., & Abo-Feteih, S. S. M. (2017). Influence of irrigation intervals under different sowing dates on water relations, yield and quality nutrition of guar forage crop. Egyptian Journal of Agronomy, 39(3), 293-305. https://doi.org/10.21608/agro.2017.1447.1072
CAPTCHA Image
Volume 22, Issue 4 - Serial Number 76
January 2025
Pages 373-384
  • Receive Date: 06 January 2024
  • Revise Date: 13 May 2024
  • Accept Date: 10 June 2024
  • First Publish Date: 07 December 2024