Evaluation of the Effects of Bio Fertilizers Containing non Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixing and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria on Quantitative and Qualitative Traits of Wheat

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Islamic Azad University

2 islamic azad university science and research

3 Research Center of Mazandaran

Abstract

Introduction
Wheat crop plays an important role in food security in a country such as Iran. Therefore, serious attention has been paid to ecological farming systems and sustainable management of wheat. For this purpose extensive efforts is done to find proper strategies to improve the quality of soil, agricultural products and started removal pollutants. One of the factors to achieve sustainable agriculture is to use natural agents such as biofertilizers. Several mechanisms are proposed to explain how effective plant growth promoting rhizobacteria is for growth and development of plants. These mechanisms include two groups, direct and indirect in general. Indirect mechanism is to increase absorption and availability of the nutrient elements soluble, producing plant growth regulators, siderophore production of iron chelator, and the phosphate soluble. Through indirect mechanisms such as antagonistic relation, PGPRs moderate the harmful effects of of plant pathogens and thereby lead to increase plant growth. The main goal of this study was to investigate the effect of biofertilizers containing non-symbiotic nitrogen fixing and phosphate solubilizing bacteria on quantitative and qualitative traits of wheat.

Materials and Methods
This Experiment was conducted in the research farm of Baykola agricultural research stations affiliated by agriculture and natural resources research center of Mazandaran during 2011-12 cropping season. In order to determine physical and chemical properties of the soil samples were taken from the depth of 0-30 cm,. Experimental design was split plots arrangement based on randomized complete block design with three replications. In this experiment chemical fertilizer was assumed as the main plot in 3 levels include: 1- noconsumption (C0), 2- equivalent to 50% of the fertilizer recommendations (C1), 3- equivalent to 100% of the fertilizer recommendations(C2) and two types of biological fertilizers was applied in the sub plot in 4 levels: 1-noinoculation (B0), 2- Seeds inoculated with nitrogen fixing bacteria (B1), 3-Seed inoculation with phosphate solubilizing bacteria (B2), 4- Combined application of bio-fertilizers (B3).

Results and Discussion
Analysis of variance showed that grain yield, plant height, leaf area index, yield components, straw weight, biological yield, harvest index, percent of nitrogen and grain protein were influenced by different levels of biological and chemical fertilizers (Table 3). The highest grain yield was obtained using C2B3, combination treatments using chemical fertilizers and biofertilizers (PSB+NFB). The results of interactions between chemical fertilizers and biofertilizers showed the using 100% of the recommendations fertilizer along with biofertilizers (PSB+NFB) significantly increased grain yield (Table 5), compared with control. Due to increasing activity of bacteria Aztobacter chroococum, Azospirillium brasilense enhanced nitrogen fixation and released phyto hormones and thereby increased nutrient uptake by the roots. In addition, Pseudomonas Potida and Pantoea agglomerace had beneficial effects beside phosphorus uptake. These bacteria increased absorption and dissolved nutrients in the soil around the roots. PGPRs produced the plant growth regulator, organic acids and increased the ability to absorb elements such as iron, zinc and other micro elements and ultimately were effective in increasing crop yield and percent of nitrogen and grain protein.

Conclusions
Results of the experiment showed that using phosphate solubilizing bacteria and nitrogen fixing simultaneously or individually increased total plant biomass, grain nitrogen, protein content, yield components and crop yield. However, the combined use of phosphate solubilizing bacteria and nitrogen fixing compared to use of individually was more s effective. A synergic effect was found between chemical fertilizers and biological fertilizers. It is recommended to apply chemical fertilizers along with biological fertilizers to achieve highest possible yield.

Keywords


1. Agata, W. 1990. Mechanism of high yielding an achievement in Chinese F1 rice compared with cultivated rice varieties. Japan Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology 59: 270-273.
2. Amano, T., Zhu, Q., Wan, Y., Inou, N., and Tanake, H. 1993. Case studies on high yields of paddy rice in Jiangsu Province, China. I. Characteristic of grain production. Japan Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology 62: 267-274.
3. Asadi Rahmani, H., Khavazy, K., Asgharzadeh, A., Rajalee, F., and Afshari, M. 2010. Biofertilizersin Iran. Opportunities and Challenges. First Challenges Congress fertilizer in Iran. Half a century of fertilizer consumption (Key Articles).
4. Banik, S., and Dey, B. K., 1982. Available phosphate content of an alluvial soil is influenced by inoculation of some isolated phosphate solubilizing microorganisms. Plant Soil 69: 353-364.
5. Cohen, E., Okon, Y., Kigel, J., Nur, I., and Henis, Y. 1980. Increase in dry weight and total nitrogen content in Zea mays and Serariaitalica associated with nitrogenfixing Azospirillum. Plant Physiology 66: 746-749.
6. Dasilva, P., and Stutte, C. 1981. Nitrogen loss in conjunction with translocation from leaves as influenced by growth stage, leaf position and N supply. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 73: 38-42.
7. Engel, A. J., Bird, A., Hil, J. E., Horwath, W. R., and Kessel, C. V. 2001. Nitrogen dynamics and fertilizer use efficiency in rice following straw in corporation and winter flooding. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 93: 1346-1354.
8. Falah Nosratabad, A., and Khavazy, K. 2001. Role of phosphate solubilizing bacteria in agriculture. Necessity in the industrial production of biological fertilizers (Total articles). Publication Agricultural Education commissioned by the Institute of Soil and Water.
9. Gastal, F., and Nelson, C. J. 1994. Nitrogen use within the growing leaf blade of tall fescue. Plant Physiology 105-119.
10. Ghalavand, A., Shirvani, A., Dehganshoar, M., Malakoti, M., Asgharzadeh, A., and Chokan, D. 2009. Application of biofertilizers (Biological), Strategy for ecologically sustainable management of agricultural ecosystems, Iranian agronomy and Breeding Sciences Ninth congress (Key Articles). p. 200-224.
11. Glick, B. R. 1995. The enhancement of plant growth by freeliving bacteria. Canadian Journal of Microbioly 41: 109-117.
12. Hirel, B., Gouis, J., Ney, B., and Gallais, A. 2007. The Challenger of improving nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants: towards a more central role of genetic variability and quantitative genetics within integrated approaches. J. Exp. Bot. 58: 2369-2387.
13. Hirose, T., and Bazzaz, F. A. 1995. Trade off between lightand nitrogen use efficiency in canopy photosynthesis. Ann. Bot 82: 195-202.
14. Jones, D. L. 1998. Organic acids in the rhizospherea critical review. Plant Soil 205: 25-44.
15. Jones, D. G., and Lewis, D. M. 1993. Rhizobium inoculation of crops plants. In: Exploitation of micro-organisms. Jones, D. G. (Eds.). Chapman and Hall, London. 112: 197-224.
16. Kapulnik, Y., Sarige, S., Nur, I., and Henis, Y. 1981. Effect of Azospirillum Inculation on some growth parameters and N content of wheat, sorghum and panicum. Plant Soil 61: 65-77.
17. Khosravi, H. 1997. Study of frequency of and release of azotobacter chroococcum In gricultural soils of Tehran province and Some physiological characteristics of the research, MSc thesis, Faculty of agriculture, University of Tehran.
18. Klopper, H. J. W., Lifshitz, R., and Zablotowicx, R. M. 1989. Freeliving bacterial inoculators enhancing crop productivity. Trends in Biotechnology 7: 39-44.
19. Leinhos, V., and Nacek, O. 1994. Biosynthesis of auxins by PSMs from Wheat and Rye. Microbiol. Res. 149: 31-35.
20. Mac Adam, J. W., Volenec, J. J., and Nelson, C. J. 1989. Effects of nitrogen on mesophyll cell division and epidermal cell elongation intall fescue leaf blades. Plant Physiology 89: 549-556.
21. Malakoti, M. j., Khademi, Z., and Golchin, Z. 2009. Ways to increase wheat protein and actions to improve the quality while buying bread. Balanced nutrition of wheat (Key Articles) Second edition. p 39-46.
22. Molla, M. A. Z., and Chodhury, A. A. 1984. Microbial mineralization, of organic phosphate in soil, Plant Soil 78 (3): 393-399.
23. Mousavi, S. H. 2010. an analysis of self sufficiency in wheat production. PhD thesis, Agricultural Economics, Shiraz University.
24. Noor Mohammad, G., Syadat, A., and Kashani, A. 2010. The first volume of cereal crops. Shahid Chamran University Publications. p. 25-33.
25. Patriquin, D. G., and Dobereiner, J. 1978. Light microscopy observation of tetrazolium reducing in the endorhizosphere of maize and other grasses in Brazil. Canadian Journal of Microbioly 24: 734-742.
26. Rai, R. 1988. High temperature adapted A. brasilense strain: growth and interaction response on associative nitrogen fixation, mineral uptake and yield of cheem (Panicum miliaceum L.) genotypes in calcareous soil. J. Agric. Sci. 110: 321-329.
27. Rai, S. N., and Gaur, A. C. 1988. A characterization of Azotobacter spp, and effect of Azotobacterization in presence of fertilizer nitrogen in the yield of wheat. Indian Soc. Soi. Sci. 33: 424-426.
28. Sadrzadeh, S. M. 2004. Research of nitrogen and potassium Fertilizer on yield and yield components and index of rice growing Khazar varieties. MSc thesis Agronomy, College of Agricultural Sciences University of Guilan.
29. Sarige, S., Blum, A., and Okon, Y. 1992. Improvement of the water status and yield of fieldgrown grain sorghum by inoculation with Azospirillum brasillense. J. Agric. Sci. 110: 271-277.
30. Schnier, H. F., Dingkuhu, M., Dedatta, S., Mengel, K., and Faronilo, J. 1990. Nitrogen fertilization of direct seeded flooded transplanted rice: Nitrogen uptake, photosynthesis, growth and yield. Crop Science 30:1276-1284.
31. Shimon, M., Trosh, H., and Glick. B. R. 2004. Plant growth promoting bacteria confer resistance tomato plant to salt stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 42: 565-572.
32. Sinclair, T. R. 1998. Historical changes in harvest index crop Sci: 38: 638-643.
33. Singh, S., and Kapoor, K. K. 1998. Inoculation with phosphate solubilizing microorganisms and a vesicular arbuscula rmycorrhizal fungus improves dry matter yield and nutrient uptake by wheat grown in a sandy soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 95: 373-397.
34. Taha, S. M., Mahmoud, S. A. Z., Halim, A., Damaty. E. L., and Abd Elhafez, A. M. 1969. Activity of phosphate dissolving bacteria in Egyptian soils. Plant and Soil 113: 149-159.
35. Tilak, K. V. B., Singh, C. S., Roy, V. K., and Rao, N. S. S. 1982. Azosprillum brasilense and azotobacter chroococcum inoculum: effect of maize and sorghum. Soil Biol. Biochem.14: 417-418.
36. Yang, J., Zhang, J., Wang, Z., Liu, L., and Zhu, Q. 2003. Post anthesis water deficits enhance grain filling in tow line hybrid rice. Crop Science 43: 2099-2108.
37. Zahir, A. Z., Arshad, M., and Franend berger, W. F. 2004. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: application and perspectives in agriculture. Adv. Agron, 81: 97-168.
CAPTCHA Image