Investigating the Possibility of Autumn-Sown and Determining the Most Suitable Planting Date and the Best Bolt-Resistant Cultivar of Sugar Beet in Khorasan Region

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student of Agroecology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is the second most important sugar crop after sugarcane, which annually produces about 40% of total sugar production worldwide and is adapted to different climatic conditions (El-Hag et al., 2015). Due to global warming, autumn cultivation of sugar beet is predicted to become more priority in the future, but autumn cultivation is in danger of bolting and flowering in many areas. Excessive bolting reduces sugar content, root yield, and purity of raw syrup. In general, both early sowing and delayed sowing reduce root yield, sugar, and leaf area index and increase the percentage of impurities. Therefore, this experiment was designed and implemented with the aim of feasibility study of autumn cultivation of sugar beet and determination of the best planting date in North, Razavi, and South Khorasan provinces for three new varieties resistant to sugar beet.
Materials and Methods
The experiment was conducted as a split-plot design based on a randomized complete block design with three replications in the provinces of North Khorasan (Shirvan), Khorasan Razavi (Mashhad), and South Khorasan  (Khezri Dasht-e Bayaz) in 2019-2020. The main plots included three planting dates (2, 7, and 12 October) and the subplots included three bolt-resistant sugar beet cultivars (Giada, Merak, and Sharif). Each plot consisted of 6 rows with a length of 5 m, at a distance of 50 cm and a distance between two plants of 20 cm, and planting was done manually. To determine root yield from the middle rows of each plot by eliminating the margin, harvest was done at an area of 4 m2. A sample of root paste of each treatment was sent to the Beta Lizer laboratory of Mashhad Agricultural Research and Agricultural Services Company to determine the percentage of sugar. Other quality parameters were measured by Beta Lizer (Braunschweig method). Using the polarimetry method (Sucromat), the percentage of sugar content and white sugar yield, and other quality parameters were calculated for all experimental plots. Combined analysis of variance for different locations and mean comparison based on least significant difference (LSD) at the level of 5% probability using SAS 9.4 software was performed. Also, the graph plots were performed using Excel software.
Results and Discussion
The results of the analysis of variance showed that the interaction effects of the location and cultivar were significant on bolting percentage, root yield, sugar content, Na content, yield coefficient, and white sugar yield. The first planting date (October 2) in Mashhad region for all three cultivars led to the highest percentage of bolting (78-90%). Delay in planting date from 2 October to 12 October, the bolting percentage of cultivars was reduced, significantly. The bolting percentage in Shirvan region was less than 8%. On the third planting date (October 12) in all regions, cultivars showed also a bolting percentage of less than 10%. Giada cultivar in Mashhad region with 47.3 ton.ha-1 had the highest and Sharif cultivar in Shirvan region with 22.6 ton.
ha-1 had the lowest root yield. Shirvan region had less root yield than the other two regions. The highest sugar content (18.78%) belonged to Giada cultivar in Shirvan region and the lowest sugar content (13.01%) was observed in Sharif cultivar in Mashhad region. The planting date of 12 October was significantly lower in impurities, alkalinity coefficient, and molasses compared to earlier planting dates. The first planting date had the lowest (62.3%) and the third planting date had the highest (74.2%) extraction coefficient. Giada cultivar in Shirvan region had the highest extraction coefficient (78.1%) and the lowest extraction coefficient (60.8%) belonged to Sharif cultivar in Mashhad region.
Conclusion
In Shirvan and Khezri regions, Giada cultivar but in Mashhad region, Merak cultivars had the highest white sugar yield. In general, the results showed that in Shirvan region, planting on 2 October and in Mashhad and Khezri regions planting on 7 October could lead to reaching maximum white sugar yield.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Abdollahian Noghabi, M., Sheykholeslami, M., & Babaei, J. (2005). Terms and meanings of technological quantity and quality of sugar beet. Journal of Sugar Beet, 21, 101-104. (in Persian with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.22092/JSB.2005.8201
  2. Adibifard, N., Habibi, D., Bazrafshan, M., Taleghani, D. F., & Ilkaee, M. N. (2019). Study of the climatic condition of Fars province for the development of autumn-sown sugar beet planting using Geographic Information System (GIS). Journal of Sugar Beet, 35(1), 13-31. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22092/JSB.2019.116356.1169
  3. Adibifard, N., Habibi, D., Bazrafshan, M., Taleghani, D. F., & Ilkaee, M. N. (2017). Investigating of cultivating the autumn sugar beet in Fars Province (Zarghan). International Journal of Research Studies in Agricultural Sciences (IJRSAS), 3, 1-9.
  4. Al-Jbawi, E. M., & Al-Zubi, H. I. (2016). Effect of sowing date and length of storage on storability in sugar beets (Beets vulgaris ) piles. Scholarly Journal of Agriculture Science, 6(1), 25-31.
  5. Al-Jbawi, E. M., Sabsabi, W., Gharibo, G. A., & Omar, A. E. A. (2015). Effect of sowing date and plant density on bolting of four sugar beet (Beta vulgaris ) varieties. International Journal of Environment, 4(2), 256-270. https://doi.org/10.3126/ije.v4i2.12647
  6. Ashraf Mansouri, G., Sharifii, M., & Hamdi, F. (2013). Study of autumn sowing of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) in Fasa area. Journal of Sugar Beet, 29(1), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2013.1299
  7. Awad, M., Abdel-Daim, A., & Sahar, M. I. M. (2014). Evaluation of six sugar beet cultivars under three harvesting dates. Journal of Agricultural Research, 39(1), 121-130.
  8. Basati, J., Koolivand, M., Nemati, A., & Zarei, A. (2002). Evaluation of autumn-sown sugar beet production possibility in Kermanshah warm regions. Journal of Sugar Beet, 18(2), 119-130. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2003.8279
  9. Draycott, P. (2006). Sugar Beet. Blackwell publishing Ltd. 514 pp.
  10. El-Hag, M. A., Ahmed, A. O., & Ragga, P. W. M. (2015). Evaluation of sowing date and harvesting ages of some sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) cultivars under Guneid condition (Sudan). International Journal of Agriculture, 3(9), 421-424.
  11. El-Sheikh, S. R. E., Khaled, K. A. M., & Enan, S. A. A. M. (2009). Evaluation of some sugar beet varieties under three harvesting dates. Mansoura University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 34(3), 1559-1567. https://doi.org/10.21608/jacb.2009.90288
  12. Enan, S. A. A. M., El-Sheikh, S. R. E., & Khaled, K. A. M. (2009). Evaluation of some sugar beet varieties under different levels of N and Mo fertilization. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 4(1), 345-362.
  13. FAO. (2020). Food and Agriculture Organization. Crop production sugar beet. In: Statistical Yearbook. FAO Rome.
  14. Ghasemi, S., Sadeghzadeh Hemayati, S., Taleghani, D, Siavashi, K., & Hosseinpour, M. (2020). Determination of the proper planting date and harvest of commercial sugar beet cultivars in autumn cultivation in Ilam province. Journal of Sugar Beet, 36(1), 15-25. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2021.343129.1240
  15. Gobarah, M. E., & Mekki, B. B. (2005). Influence of boron application on yield and juice quality of some sugar beet cultivars grown under saline soil conditions. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 1(5), 373-379.
  16. Hemayati, S., Shirzadi, M., Aghaeezadeh, M., Taleghani, D., Javaheri, M., & Aliasghari, A. (2012). Evaluation of sowing and harvesting date effects on yield and quality of five sugar beet cultivars in Jiroft region (autumn planting). Journal of Sugar Beet, 28(1), 42-25. https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2012.659
  17. Hoffmann, C. M., & Kluge-Severin, S. (2011). Growth analysis of autumn and spring sown sugar beet. European Journal of Agronomy, 34, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2010.09.001
  18. Hoosin, M. F., Khaliq, Q. A., & Karim, A. (2015). Effect of sowing date on growth and yield of tropical sugar beet. International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research, 7(1), 53-60.
  19. Illkaee, M. N., Babaei, Z., Baghdadi, A., & Golzardi, F. (2016). Effect of different planting dates and defoliation on the properties of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences, 4(1), 52-58. http://doi.org/10.18006/2015.4(1).52.58
  20. Jaggard, K., & Werker, A. (1999). An evaluation of the potential benefits and costs of autumn-sown sugar beet in NW Europe. Journal of Agricultural Science, 132(1), 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185969800608X
  21. Javaheri, M. A., Najafinejad, H., & Azad Shahraki, F. (2006). Investigating the possibility of autumn beet cultivation in Arzooieh region (Kerman province). Journal of Pajhouhesh and Sazandegi, 71, 93-85. (in Persian with English abstract).
  22. Kandil, A. A., Bandawi, M. A., El-Moursy, S. A., & Abdou, U. M. A. (2004). Effect of planting dates, nitrogen levels and biofertilization treatments on growth attributes of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Science Journal of King Faisal University, 5(2), 227-237.
  23. Kumar, D., Lamani, A., & Halikatti, S. I. (2019). Performance of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) to different dates of sowing under temperature regime. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science, 27(1), 1-12. http://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2019/v27i130067
  24. Leilah, A. A., Badawi, M. A., Said, E. M., Ghonema, M. H., & Abdou, M. A. E. (2005). Effect of planting dates, plant population and nitrogen fertilization on sugar beet productivity under the newly reclaimed sandy soils in Egypt. Science Journal of King Faisal University, 6(1), 95-110.
  25. Maralian, H., Tobeh, A. A. S., Mikail, R. D., & Aghabarati, (2008). Effect of sowing date and limited irrigation on root yield and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 7(3), 298-303. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2008.298.303
  26. Nabipour, Z., Habibi, D., Ahmadi, M., Taleghani, D., & Kashani, A. (2019). Study of climatic suitability for autumn sugar beet planting in North- and South Khorasan as well as Khorasan-e Razavi provinces using Geographic Information System (GIS). Journal of Sugar Beet, 34(2), 165-179. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2019.116149.1168
  27. Nikpanah, H., Seifzadeh, S., Hemayati, S. S., Shiranirad, A., & Taleghani, D. F. (2015). Effects of management of agronomical factors on sugar beet stickling production and growth. International Journal of Bioinformatics Research and Applications, 7(2), 959-964.
  28. Nikpanah, H., Taleghani, D. F., Noormohammadi, G., & Khodadadi, S. (2010). Study of effects of planting and harvesting dates on quantity and quality of monogerm sugar beet seed in Firoozkooh, Iran. Journal of Plant Ecophysiology, 2(7), 37-45. (in Persian with English abstract).
  29. Peltonen-Sainio, P., Hakala, K., & Jauhiainen, L. (2011). Climate-induced overwintering challenges for wheat and rye in northern agriculture. Acta Agriculture Scandinavica, Section B Soil and Plant Science, 61(1), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710903535977
  30. Ramazan, C. (2002). Root yield and quality of sugar beet in relation to sowing date, plant population and harvesting date interactions. Turk Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 26, 133-139.
  31. Refay, Y. A. (2010). Root yield and quality traits of three sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) varieties in relation to sowing date and stand densities. World Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 6(5), 589-594.
  32. Reinsdorf, E., & Koch, H. (2013). Modeling crown temperature of winter sugar beet and its application in risk assessment for frost killing in central Europe. Journal of Agriculture Forest Meteorology, 182-183, 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.08.001
  33. Rinaldi, M., & Vonella, A. V. (2006). The response of autumn and spring sown sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) to irrigation in southern Italy: water and radiation use efficiency. Field Crops Research, 95, 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.12.004
  34. Sadeghian Mottahar, S. Y. (1999). Bolting, undesirable phenomenon in sugar beet. Agricultural Education and Extension Publication No.12. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Tehran, Iran. (in Persian).
  35. Salmasi, S. Z., Golezani, K. G., & Moghbeli, S. (2006). Effect of sowing date and limited irrigation on the seed yield and quality of dill (Anethum graveolens). Turkish Journal of Agriculture & Forestry, 30(4), 281-286.
  36. Shalaby, N. M. E., Osman, A. M. H., & Allabbody, A. H. S. A. (2011). Relative performance of some sugar beet varieties under three plant densities in newly reclaimed soil. Egyptian Journal of Agriculture and Research, 89(1), 291-299. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejar.2011.174272
  37. Sogut, T., & Arioglu, H. (2004). Plant density and sowing date effects on sugar beet yield and quality. Journal of Agronomy, 3(3), 215-218. https://doi.org/10.3923/ja.2004.215.218
  38. Somayeh, K., Mehraban, A., Mobasser, H. R., & Zahra, B. (2012). Sowing date and transplant root size effect on transplanted sugar beet in spring planting. Annals of Biological Research, 3(7), 3474-3478.
  39. Stibbe, C., & Marlander, B. (2002). Field emergence dynamics significance to intraspecific competition and growth efficiency in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). European Journal of Agronomy, 17, 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00005-9
  40. Taleghani, D., Moharamzadeh, M., Sadeghzadeh Hemayati, S., Mohammadian, R., & Farahmand, R. (2011). Effect of planting and harvesting date on yield of autumn sown sugar beet in Moghan area. Seed and Plant Production Journal, 27(3), 371-355. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22092/sppj.2017.110442
  41. Taleghani, D., Sharifi, H., Ahmadi, M., Asharfmansouri, G., Moharramzadeh, M., Javaheri, M., Bassati, J., Ebrahamian, H., Hemayati, S., Aghaezadeh, M., Abdollahian, M., Urazizadeh, M. R., Norbina, A., Hosseinpour, M., Sadeghian Mottahar, S. Y., Mohammadian, R., Mahmoudi, S. B., & Yousefabadi, V. A. (2010). Development of autumn sugar beet cultivars in Iran, pp. 81-95. In: Proceedings of the 11th Crop Sciences Congress of Iran. (in Persian with English abstract).
  42. Vico, G., Hurry, V., & Weih, M. (2014). Snowed in for survival: quantifying the risk of winter damage to overwintering field crops in northern temperate latitudes. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 197, 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.06.003
CAPTCHA Image
Volume 20, Issue 4 - Serial Number 68
January 2023
Pages 381-400
  • Receive Date: 12 December 2021
  • Revise Date: 07 March 2022
  • Accept Date: 11 April 2022
  • First Publish Date: 11 April 2022