Simulation of Irrigated Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. Pishtaz cultivar) Yield using DSSAT Model and AgMERRA Data in Khorasan Razavi Province

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Irrigation and Reclamation Engineering, College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

2 Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Ensuring food security has significant importance to countries with arid and semiarid climates and inadequate water for irrigation, like Iran which is quite vulnerable to climate change consequences. Strategic decision-making is crucial for effective production of agricultural crops especially cereals. Wheat is a strategic crop for achieving food security in Iran which is cultivated both rain-fed and irrigated. Crop models are mathematical expressions of the plant growth and development under different environmental and management conditions. These models’ performance and accuracy rely on high-quality and long-term input data especially observed or generated climatic databases. The aim of this study is to simulate the yield of irrigated Pishtaz cultivar wheat in seven cities of Razavi Khorasan province using DSSAT crop model and AgMERRA reanalysis data.
Materials and Methods
In this study, required daily weather data of seven stations located across Khrosan Razavi province namely Mashhad, Neishabour, Gonabad, Torbet-Haidaryeh, Torbet-Jam, Sabzevar, and Kashmer for the period of 1980-2010 were collected and used. The observed daily data included rainfall, maximum and minimum temperatures, wind speed, and sunshine hours. Corresponding period AgMERRA reanalysis data were also retrieved from the database to be used as an alternative input. AgMERRA is a global gridded daily weather dataset that was originally generated using NASA’s MERRA model (the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications). The AgMERRA global gridded climate dataset (0.25×0.25) has a horizontal resolution of approximately 25 km. It provides daily, high-resolution, and continuous meteorological datasets for the period 1980-2010. It is proven to be useful for agricultural and meteorological studies. Annual irrigated wheat yield data, soil information (including texture, depth, nitrogen content, and moisture), and management data i.e. variety, planting date, planting depth, and row spacing were obtained from agricultural stations across the province. The Crop Simulation Model (CERES-wheat module) of the DSSAT version 4.6 was used to simulate irrigated wheat yield. DSSAT (Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer) is a package of several dynamic simulation models for over 42 crops that has been tested and applied for more than 30 years in more than174 countries with acceptable results. The reported genetic coefficients for selected wheat variety from previous studies in the region were used. The statistical indices, including the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE) and normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) were used for comparisons and evaluation of the model performance for both runs using observed and reanalysis weather data.
Results and Discussion
The comparison between observed and reanalysis AgMERRA climate data in all seven study stations revealed a good agreement with correlation coefficient ranging from 0.67 to 0.92 and highest correlation was observed in air temperature time series. Besides, the error indies range for AgMERRA dataset determined as MAE from 3.87 to 4.11 and RMSE from 4.93 to 7.76. The model was run for simulation of Pishtaz variety yield, which has already been calibrated and evaluated in Khorasan Razavi province, using observed and AgMERRA climatic data. According to NRMSE, RMSE, and R2 statistical indices application of observed climatic data for simulation of the selected wheat yield is more accurate with R2 between 0.63-0.72 in study stations compared to AgMERRA data application with R2 ranging from 0.50 to 0.67.
Conclusion
According to statistical metrics, the use of observed data comparing to AgMERRA reanalysis provided better estimations of irrigated wheat in all study stations. Although the AgMERRA may also be used as a suitable alternate data with acceptable accuracy. Therefore, the climate datasets can be recommended as an input of crop models in regions with limited or non-reliable climate data. Further studies using another climate datasets and other crops is required for more scrutiny.
Acknowledgment
Authors would like to acknowledge the Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Iran Ministry of Agriculture, and also Iran Meteorological Organization for their assistance and providing required data.

Keywords

Main Subjects


©2025 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

  1. Arun, G., & Ghimire, K. (2019). Estimating post-harvest loss at the farm level to enhance food security: A case of Nepal. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences, 3(September), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2019.3.3
  2. Aslani, P., Davari, M., Mahmoodi, M. A., Hosseinpanahi, F., & Khaleghpanah, N. (2021). Effect of zeolite and nitrogen on some basic soil properties and wheat yield in potato-wheat rotation. Agricultural Engineering44(1), 97-119. (in Persien with English abstract). https://doi.org/22055/agen.2021.37397.1603
  3. Badescu, V. (2008). Modeling solar radiation at the earth’s surface. SpringerVerlag, Berlin/Heidelberg.
  4. Bahroloum, R., Ramezani Etedali, H., Azizian, A., & Ababaei, B. (2020). Use of gridded weather datasets in simulation of wheat yield and irrigated requirement (Case study: Iran’s Qazvin plain). Iranian Journal of Ecohydrology7(3), 691-706. (in Persien with English abstract). https://doi.org/22059/ije.2020.303567.1339
  5. Bannayan, M., Sanjani, S., Alizadeh, A., Lotfabadi, S. S., & Mohamadian, A. (2010). Association between climate indices, aridity index, and rainfed crop yield in northeast of Iran. Field Crops Research118(2), 105-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.04.011
  6. Dahmardeh, A., Shahriari, A., Pahlavan Rad, M. R., Shabani, A., & Ghoebani, M. (2021). Modeling wheat yield using some soil properties at the field scale (Case study: Sistan dam research farm, university of Zabol). Agricultural Engineering44(1), 81-95. (in Persien with English abstract). https://org/10.22055/agen.2021.35343.1588
  7. Eyshi Rezaei, E., & Lashkari, A. (2019). The consequences of change in management practices on maize yield under climate warming in Iran. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 137, 1001-1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2637-8
  8. Fallah, M. H., Nezami, A., Khazaie, H. R., & Nassiri Mahallati, M. (2020). Evaluation of DSSAT-Nwheat model across a wide range of climate conditions in Iran. Journal of Agroecology12(4), 561-580. (in Persien with English abstract). https://org/10.22067/jag.v12i4.77250
  9. Farhadi, M., Jahan, M., & Bannayan Aval, M. (2021). Investigation of validity and possibility of using AgMERRA networked dataset in North Khorasan province. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research19(2), 201-217. (in Persien with English abstract). https://org/10.22067/jcesc.2021.69532.1044
  10. Folberth, C., Gaiser, T., Abbaspour, K. C., Schulin, R., & Yang, H. (2012). Regionalization of a large-scale crop growth model for sub-Saharan Africa: Model setup, evaluation, and estimation of maize yields. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment151, 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.01.026
  11. Folberth, C., Yang, H., Gaiser, T., Abbaspour, K. C., & Schulin, R. (2013). Modeling maize yield responses to improvement in nutrient, irrigated and cultivar inputs in sub-Saharan Africa. Agricultural Systems119, 22-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.04.002
  12. Jahan, M., Farhadi, M., Bannayan Aval, M., Fallah, M. H., & Yaghoubi, F. (2023). Study of changes in long-term wheat production trend and factors affecting it in North Khorasan province: I- irrigated wheat. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research21(3), 265-284. (in Persien with English abstract). https://org/10.22067/jcesc.2022.78172.1192
  13. Javanshiri, Z., Asadi Oskouei, E., Flamarzi, Y., & Abasi, F. (2023). Accuracy assessment of CFS-v2, MERRA-2, ERA-5 temperature over the different regions of Iran. Iranian Journal of Geophysics17(4), 1-24. (in Persien with English abstract). https://org/10.30499/ijg.2022.360882.1452
  14. Jowkar, L., Panahi, F., Sadatinejad, S. J., & Shakiba, A. (2021). Precipitation extremes variability trend in Bakhtegan Catchment using AgMERRA and stations data. Irrigation and Irrigated Engineering12(1), 364-381. (in Persien with English abstract). https://org/10.22125/iwe.2021.138351
  15. Lashkari, A., Bannayan Aval, M., Koocheki, A., Alizadeh, A., Choi, Y. S., & Park, S. (2016). Applicability of AgMERRA forcing dataset forgap-filling of in-situ meteorological observation, case study: Mashhad plain. Irrigated and Soil29(6), 1749-1758. (in Persien with English abstract). https://org/10.22067/jsw.v29i6.41686
  16. lotfi, M., Kamali, G., Meshkatee, A., Varshavian, V. (2021). Evaluation of yield changes and length of dryland wheat phenological stages under RCP scenario using DSSAT and AquaCrop models in Western Iran. Iranian Journal of Soil and Irrigated Research, 52(10), 2665-2677. (in Persien). https://doi.org/10.22059/ijswr.2021.321307.668925
  17. Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., & Veith, T. L. (2007). Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE50(3), 885-900.
  18. Ozili, P. K. (2023). The acceptable R-square in empirical modelling for social science research. In social research methodology and publishing results: A guide to non-native english speakers. pp. 134-143. IGI global.
  19. Ramezani Etedali, H., Gorgin, F., & Kakvand, P. (2022). Study of the performance of two meteorological datasets in estimating the maize irrigated footprint, a case study: Qazvin Plain. Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage15(6), 1394-1403. (in Persien with English abstract). https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20087942.1400.15.6.1.1
  20. Raymundo, R., Asseng, S., Robertson, R., Petsakos, A., Hoogenboom, G., Quiroz, R., Hareau, G., & Wolf, J. (2018). Climate change impact on global potato production. European Journal of Agronomy, 100(November 2016), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.11.008
  21. Razavi, A. R., Nassiri Mahallati, M., Koocheki, A., & Beheshti, A. (2018). Applicability of AgMERRA for gap-filling of Afghanistan in-situ temperature and precipitation data. Irrigated and Soil32(3), 601-616. (in Persien with English abstract). https://org/10.22067/jsw.v32i3.68501
  22. Salehnia, N., Alizadeh, A., Sanaeinejad, H., Bannayan, M., Zarrin, A., & Hoogenboom, G. (2017). Estimation of meteorological drought indices based on AgMERRA precipitation data and station-observed precipitation data. Journal of Arid Land9, 797-809.
  23. Van Wart, J., Grassini, P., Yang, H., Claessens, L., Jarvis, A., & Cassman, K. G. (2015). Creating long-term weather data from thin air for crop simulation modeling. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology209, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.02.020
  24. Yaghoubi, F., Bannayan Aval, M., & Asadi, G. A. (2018). Evaluation of grided AgMERRA weather data for simulation of irrigated requirement and yield of rainfed wheat in Khorasan Razavi province. Irrigated and Soil32(2), 415-431. (in Persien with English abstract). https://org/10.22067/jsw.v32i2.68948
  25. Zandi, R. (2016). Climate classification of Khorasan-Razavi province by the Dumartin method using geographic information system. Geographical Sciences, Architecture and Urban Planning Research Quarterly, 1(10). (in Persien with English abstract).
CAPTCHA Image
Volume 23, Issue 3 - Serial Number 79
September 2025
Pages 257-270
  • Receive Date: 06 August 2024
  • Revise Date: 20 October 2024
  • Accept Date: 23 October 2024
  • First Publish Date: 12 April 2025